A Singapore Study to Assess How Neurovision Improve the Vision of Adults With Low to Moderate Myopia
NCT ID: NCT00348075
Last Updated: 2010-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-01-31
2009-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Singapore Pilot Study to Assess Neurovision in Treatment of Low Myopia
NCT00348127
Pilot Study of Neurovision to Improve Vision and Slow Myopia Progression in Children With Myopia
NCT00348218
Efficacy of LASIK Versus PRK in Asians With Mild and Moderate Myopia
NCT00348049
Evaluating NeuroVision's Neural Vision Correction (NVC) Myopia Treatment
NCT00469612
Comparative Study of Cycloplegic Refraction and Subjective Refraction With Fogging in School Age Children
NCT00347347
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The technology has been proven in both Israel and Singapore's pilot study to work for myopia -1.50D and below.
This study is a clinical trial for Singapore Ministry of Defence personnel to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment beyond the proven myopia range. There will be 2 phases in the study; Phase 1 will include low myopes from -0.50D to -1.50D while Phase 2 covers moderate myopes from -1.75D to -3.00D. Subjects will be randomised into treatment and placebo group in the ratio of 3:1.
A randomized double masked controlled trial conducted in 2 Phases:
Phase I will involve 140 study subjects with low myopia randomized in a 3:1 randomization to receive NVC treatment versus placebo treatment.
It is assumed that the withdrawal rate will not exceed 20%, so that at least 112 study subjects will complete the treatment phase.
Interim analysis with stopping rule will be conducted after 3/4 of the patients complete the treatment phase.
Phase II will involve 180 study subjects with moderate myopia randomized in a 3:1 randomization to receive NVC treatment versus placebo treatment.
The 2 phases will be separate RCTs, with recruitment of Phase II subjects subsequent to completion of Phase I NVC treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neurovision
Neurovision
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neurovision
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The subject's refractive status is stable, with no increase beyond 0.5D in sphere or cylinder over the last six months.
3. The subject's age is between 17-55 years.
4. The subject's uncorrected visual acuity in both eyes should be between 0.1 and 0.7 logMAR.
5. The subject's best corrected visual acuity 0.05 LogMar (either eye)
6. The subject is cognitively intact and is able to follow multiple step instructions.
7. The subject is able to cease contact lens wear from Baseline examination onwards until the end of the treatment period. The subject is able to cease contact lens wear for at least a week before attending the Baseline examination, Post-treatment evaluation and Persistence evaluation.
8. The subject is able and willing to attend all study sessions and visits at the required frequency:
1. The total number of treatments is individual, approximately 30.
2. The required pace for the treatment sessions is at least 3 sessions per week.
3. No foreseen interruptions longer than 2 weeks during the treatment course.
9. Subject (or subject's parent/legal guardian if subject is less than 21 years of age at study entry) agrees to sign the Informed Consent Form (See Appendix D)
10. Manifest spherical equivalence - not more than 1.0Ds difference from cycloplegic spherical equivalence
11. Unaided VA difference between both eyes is less than 0.3 logMAR
12. The patient is very keen to improve unaided vision and to decrease the dependency on eye glasses
1. The subject's cycloplegic spherical equivalence in the worst eye is within the range of -1.750DS to -3.0DS of myopia, and astigmatism does not exceed 0.75DC in either eye.
2. The subject's refractive status is stable, with no increase beyond 0.5D in sphere or cylinder over the last six months.
3. The subject's age is between 17-55 years.
4. The subject's uncorrected visual acuity in the worst eye should not exceed 1.0 logMAR.
5. The subject's best corrected visual acuity 0.05 LogMar (either eye)
6. The subject is cognitively intact and is able to follow multiple step instructions.
7. The subject is able to cease contact lens wear from Baseline examination onwards until the end of the treatment period. The subject is able to cease contact lens wear for at least a week before attending the Baseline examination, Post-treatment evaluation and Persistence evaluation.
8. The subject is able and willing to attend all study sessions and visits at the required frequency:
1. The total number of treatments is individual, approximately 30.
2. The required pace for the treatment sessions is at least 3 sessions per week.
3. No foreseen interruptions longer than 2 weeks during the treatment course.
9. Subject (or subject's parent/legal guardian if subject is less than 21 years of age at study entry) agrees to sign the Informed Consent Form (See Appendix D)
Exclusion Criteria
2. The subject suffers from myopia-related visual complications resulting in visual loss, including myopic macular degeneration, myopic cataract and previous or pre-existing myopic retinal detachment.
3. The subject is suffering from Diabetes Mellitus.
4. The subject has previously undergone a refractive surgery procedure in either eye.
5. The subject is or may be pregnant.
6. The subject has an activity limitation due to medical disorders (including migraines, seizure disorders, etc.), medications, or emotional status that might potentially impair the subject's ability to perform the treatment.
17 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Defence Medical Research Institute, Singapore Armed Forces
UNKNOWN
NeuroVision
INDUSTRY
Singapore National Eye Centre
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Donald Tan, FRCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Polat U, Sagi D. Lateral interactions between spatial channels: suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments. Vision Res. 1993 May;33(7):993-9. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90081-7.
Sagi D, Tanne D. Perceptual learning: learning to see. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994 Apr;4(2):195-9. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90072-8.
Polat U, Norcia AM. Neurophysiological evidence for contrast dependent long-range facilitation and suppression in the human visual cortex. Vision Res. 1996 Jul;36(14):2099-109. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00281-2.
Polat U, Mizobe K, Pettet MW, Kasamatsu T, Norcia AM. Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature. 1998 Feb 5;391(6667):580-4. doi: 10.1038/35372.
Lim KL, Fam HB. NeuroVision treatment for low myopia following LASIK regression. J Refract Surg. 2006 Apr;22(4):406-8. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060401-20.
Polat U, Ma-Naim T, Belkin M, Sagi D. Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27;101(17):6692-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401200101. Epub 2004 Apr 19.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Neurovision Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R330/23/2003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.