Reduced Intensity Conditioning Transplantation Versus Standard of Care in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00342316

Last Updated: 2020-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

340 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-12-18

Study Completion Date

2018-07-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares overall survival between patients with acute myeloid leukemia, who are in complete remission following initial treatment with chemotherapy and whose remission is maintained either with a transplantation of stem cells obtained from a sibling or unrelated donor or with standard treatment, which is additional chemotherapy.

The study hypothesis is that the group transplanted with stem cells from a donor will have a superior survival compared with patients treated with standard of care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives:

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether RICT leads to an improved overall survival compared to conventional treatment for AML.

The secondary objectives of this study are to determine if:

* RICT leads to a superior long-term overall survival compared to conventional therapy.
* RICT leads to a superior disease-free survival compared to conventional therapy.
* Time to relapse is different between RICT and control groups.
* Quality of life is different between the two treatment groups.
* in RICT patients only:

* Safety and feasibility of the procedure
* Incidence and severity of acute and chronic Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD)
* Rate of complete and partial chimerism

Study Population:

* Newly diagnosed patients with de novo or secondary AML, intermediate or poor risk, in first complete remission aged 51-70 years.
* Not planned for a full-dose allogeneic transplant.
* According to the investigator, fit for a RICT if a suitable donor (sibling or unrelated) is found, and also fit for further consolidation chemotherapy in case no suitable donor is found.

Procedures:

Patients will receive induction therapy according to institutional practice and can be included after achieving complete remission. Patients for whom a full-dose conditioned allogeneic transplantation is planned will not be approached, neither will patients who are for other reasons judged to be ineligible for a RICT. Eligible patients will be informed about the study. After the patient's consent has been obtained, potential sibling donor(s) will be briefly informed about the study and asked if they are willing to undergo HLA-typing. Siblings with evident contraindications to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or collection of peripheral blood stem cells should not proceed to HLA-typing. A search for an unrelated matched donor (MUD) will be initiated if there is no potential sibling donor, or if sibs are not HLA-identical or otherwise not fit for the donation procedure. A patient's inclusion in the study is when blood sampling for tissue typing (HLA-typing) of the first potential sibling donor is made, or when a search warrant for a MUD is dispatched.

* Note: To enable an early donor search, patients may be registered, but not included, for the study prior to CR. These patients will be included at date of achieved CR. Registered patients not achieving CR will not be included.

Included patients with a HLA-identical sibling or with an identified MUD will be assigned to the RICT group, and included patients without such a donor will automatically be in the control group. This is a HLA-based assignment, and the final intent-to-treat analysis will be based on the treatment assignment.

After treatment assignment, patients on the control arm should receive consolidation therapy as per institutional practice, whereas patients on the RICT arm may proceed directly to RICT or receive one or maximum two consolidation courses. Patients should be in complete remission at the time of transplant. All patients will be followed for relapse and survival for a period of at least three years.

The inclusion of 352 patients in complete remission provides a statistical power of 90 % to detect a difference in overall survival at three years of 20 percentage points, ie from 30 % of control patients to 50 % in RICT patients.

Inclusion was terminated 2016-07-19 after 360 registered patients. However, some pts were excluded due to grave protocol deviations or withdrawn consent. The data base was locked in June 2018 for analysis with 309 pts (after exclusions). Follow-up was \>2 yrs fo all pts.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Formally, this is not Phase III study, since there are no new drugs or interventions. Rather - a prospective, controlled study where we include pts aimed for alloSCT before any donor search. Both groups of pts (with or without a matched donor) are followed ≥2yrs. The hypothesis is that pts with a donor do better than those without a donor (sib and/or unrelated).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stem cell transplant (RICT)

Receiving intervention consisting of Reduced Intensity Conditioning Stem Cell Transplantation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reduced Intensity Conditioning Stem Cell Transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

One of the following conditioning regimens:

1. Busulphan (orally or IV), fludarabine
2. Fludarabine, carmustine, melfalan
3. Cyclophosphamide, fludarabine

Control arm

Treatment according to standard of care, i.e. not undergoing RICT

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reduced Intensity Conditioning Stem Cell Transplantation

One of the following conditioning regimens:

1. Busulphan (orally or IV), fludarabine
2. Fludarabine, carmustine, melfalan
3. Cyclophosphamide, fludarabine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Newly diagnosed patients with de novo or secondary AML
* Intermediate or poor risk
* In first complete remission
* Age 51-70 years
* Fit for the procedure
* Fit for further consolidation chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Planned for a full-dose allogeneic transplant
Minimum Eligible Age

51 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vastra Gotaland Region

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mats Brune, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Göteborg University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Austalasian Leukaemia &Lymphoma Group Limited

East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Cancer Care Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

McMaster Site Ward 3Z, Hamilton Health Sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hematology, Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hématologie, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hematology, Royal Victoria Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hématologie, Hospital CHA Enfant-Jésus

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

L'Hôtel Dieu de Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon Cancer Centre

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Tartu University Hospital

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Turku University Hospital

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Dept of Hematology, University Hospital

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital of Patras

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Christchurch Hospital

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Wellington Hospital

Wellington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Section of Hematology, National Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Sunderby Hospital

Luleå, , Sweden

Site Status

Skåne University Hospital Lund

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

University Hospital Örebro

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska University Hospital Solna

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala Akademiska Hospital

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Canada Estonia Finland Germany Greece New Zealand Norway Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRALG1/02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HCT Versus CT in Elderly AML
NCT00766779 TERMINATED PHASE3