Reduced Intensity Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With High Risk Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia in Complete Remission

NCT ID: NCT00031655

Last Updated: 2012-12-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The reason for doing this study is to determine whether a new method of blood stem cell transplant (also known as bone marrow transplant) is able to treat acute lymphocytic leukemia. Blood stem cells are the "seed cells" necessary to make all blood cells. This new method of transplant uses a combination of low dose radiation and chemotherapy that may be less toxic and cause less harm than a conventional transplant. This lower dose transplant is called a "nonmyeloablative transplant". Researchers want to see if using less radiation and less chemotherapy combined with new immune suppressing drugs after the transplant will help a stem cell transplant to work. Researchers hope that this treatment will cure acute lymphocytic leukemia with fewer side effects. Researchers are hoping to see a mixture of recipient and donor blood cells after transplant. This mixture of donor and recipient blood cells is called "mixed chimerism". Researchers hope that donor cells will attack and eliminate the leukemia. This is called the "graft-versus-leukemia" effect. In addition, after the transplant, white blood cells from the donor may be given to enhance or "boost" the graft-versus-leukemia effect, and hopefully remove all remaining cancer cells. This study is being done because at the present time blood stem cell transplantation (or bone marrow transplantation) is the only known curative therapy for acute lymphocytic leukemia. Because of age or underlying health status acute lymphocytic leukemia patients have a higher likelihood of experiencing severe harm from a conventional blood stem cell transplant. Researchers are doing this study to see if this new nonmyeloablative method of low dose radiation and low dose chemotherapy given before transplant and immune suppressive drugs after transplant will help make the transplant safer and also cure acute lymphocytic leukemia

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if a one-year disease-free survival (DFS) of \> 25% can be achieved among adult patients with high risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in complete remission (CR) who undergo nonmyeloablative allografting.

II. To determine if a one-year DFS of \>= 40% can be achieved among pediatric patients with high risk ALL in CR who undergo nonmyeloablative allografting.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if a day +200 transplant-related mortality (TRM) of \< 25% can be achieved among patients with high risk ALL in CR who undergo nonmyeloablative allografting.

II. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in the treatment of minimal residue disease (MRD) after nonmyeloablative allografting for patients with high risk ALL in CR.

OUTLINE:

NONMYELOALATIVE CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) on days -4 to -2 and undergo total body irradiation (TBI) on day 0.

TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) on day 0. Patients with minimal residual disease may receive donor lymphocyte infusion IV.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSION: Patients receive cyclosporine orally (PO) every 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper to day 177 and mycophenolate mofetil PO very 8 hours on days 0 to 40 with taper to day 96.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at days 28, 56, 84, 120, 180, and 360; at 18 months; and annually for up to 5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission Recurrent Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Recurrent Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment (nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT)

NONMYELOALATIVE CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV on days -4 to -2 and undergo TBI on day 0.

TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic PBSCT on day 0. Patients with minimal residual disease may receive donor lymphocyte infusion IV.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSION: Patients receive cyclosporine PO every 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper to day 177 and mycophenolate mofetil PO very 8 hours on days 0 to 40 with taper to day 96.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT

donor lymphocytes

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Given IV

cyclosporine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

total-body irradiation

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo TBI

fludarabine phosphate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

mycophenolate mofetil

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

laboratory biomarker analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Undergo nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

donor lymphocytes

Given IV

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

cyclosporine

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

total-body irradiation

Undergo TBI

Intervention Type RADIATION

fludarabine phosphate

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

mycophenolate mofetil

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

laboratory biomarker analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type OTHER

peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Undergo nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ciclosporin cyclosporin cyclosporin A CYSP Sandimmune TBI 2-F-ara-AMP Beneflur Fludara Cellcept MMF PBPC transplantation PBSC transplantation peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation transplantation, peripheral blood stem cell

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ADULT PATIENTS:
* Patients 50-75 years old with high risk ALL in first CR (CR1) or ALL in CR \>= second CR (CR2)
* Patients \>= 18 years old and \< 50 years old with high risk ALL in CR1 who are not eligible for a conventional allogeneic transplantation based on general medical condition
* Patients \>= 18 years old and \< 50 years old with high risk ALL in CR1 who refuse a conventional allogeneic transplant
* Patients \>= 18 years old and \< 50 years old with ALL in CR \>= CR2 who are not eligible for a conventional allogeneic transplantation based on general medical condition
* Patients \>= 18 years old and \< 50 years old with high risk ALL in CR \>= CR2 who refuse a conventional allogeneic transplant
* CR is defined as \< 5% blasts by morphology on a bone marrow aspirate and the absence of peripheral blasts
* High risk adult ALL in CR1 includes those patients with one or more of the following:

* Age \>=30 years
* Non T-cell phenotype
* Cytogenetic abnormalities including t(9;22), t(4;11), trisomy 8, or monosomy 7
* Failure to achieve CR after 4 weeks of induction chemotherapy
* PEDIATRIC PATIENTS:
* Patients \< 18 years old with ALL in high risk CR1 who are not candidates for conventional allogeneic transplantation based on general medical condition
* Patients \< 18 years old with ALL in CR \>= CR2 who are not candidates for conventional allogeneic transplantation based on general medical condition
* Patients \< 12 years old require approval by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) principal investigator prior to enrollment
* CR is defined as \< 5% blasts by morphology on a bone marrow aspirate and absence of peripheral blasts
* High risk pediatric ALL in CR1 includes those patients with one or more of the following:

* Cytogenetic abnormalities including:

* t(9;22) with a white blood cell (WBC) \>= 25,000 at diagnosis or
* t(4;11) in patients \< 1 year old and \>= 10 years old or
* Hypodiploidy (\< 45 chromosomes)
* Failure to achieve CR after 4 weeks of induction chemotherapy
* Persistent peripheral blasts after one week of induction chemotherapy
* DONOR: FHCRC matching Grade 2.1: Unrelated donors who are prospectively:

* Matched for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1 and DQB1 alleles (must be defined by high resolution typing) and
* Only a single allele disparity will be allowed for HLA-A, B, or C as defined by high resolution typing
* DONOR: A positive anti-donor cytotoxic crossmatch is an absolute donor exclusion; donors are excluded when preexisting immunoreactivity is identified that would jeopardize donor hematopoietic cell engraftment; this determination is based on the standard practice of the individual institution; the recommended procedure for patients with 10 of 10 HLA allele level (phenotypic) match is to obtain a panel reactive antibody (PRA) screens to class I and class II antigens for all patients before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT); if the PRA shows \> 10% activity, then flow cytometric or B and T cell cytotoxic cross matches should be obtained; the donor should be excluded if any of the cytotoxic cross match assays are positive; for those patients with an HLA class I allele mismatch, flow cytometric or B and T cell cytotoxic cross matches should be obtained regardless of the PRA results
* DONOR: Patient and donor pairs homozygous at a mismatched allele are considered a two-allele mismatch, i.e., the patient is A\*0101 and the donor is A\*0102, and this type of mismatch is not allowed
* DONOR: Donor must consent to peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization with filgrastim (G-CSF) arranged through the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) or other donor centers

Exclusion Criteria

* Active central nervous system (CNS) disease
* Presence of circulating leukemic blasts (in the peripheral blood) detected by standard pathology
* Fertile men or women unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following treatment
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity
* ORGAN DYSFUNCTION, ADULT CRITERIA:
* Requiring supplementary continuous oxygen OR diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \< 40%
* Cardiac ejection fraction \< 35%
* Patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of liver disease would be evaluated for the cause of liver disease, its clinical severity in terms of liver function, and the degree of portal hypertension; patients will be excluded if they are found to have fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis of the liver with evidence of portal hypertension, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, a history of bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, uncorrectable hepatic synthetic dysfunction evinced by prolongation of the prothrombin time, ascites related to portal hypertension, bridging fibrosis, bacterial or fungal liver abscess, biliary obstruction, chronic viral hepatitis with total serum bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL, and symptomatic biliary disease
* Karnofsky performance score \< 50
* ORGAN DYSFUNCTION, PEDIATRIC CRITERIA:
* Lansky play-performance score \< 40
* Patients with active non-hematologic malignancies (except non-melanoma skin cancers)
* Patients with a history of non-hematologic malignancies (except non-melanoma skin cancers) currently in a complete remission, who are less than 5 years from the time of complete remission, and have a \> 20% risk of disease recurrence
Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

George Georges

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oregon Health and Sciences University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cooper JP, Storer BE, Granot N, Gyurkocza B, Sorror ML, Chauncey TR, Shizuru J, Franke GN, Maris MB, Boyer M, Bruno B, Sahebi F, Langston AA, Hari P, Agura ED, Lykke Petersen S, Maziarz RT, Bethge W, Asch J, Gutman JA, Olesen G, Yeager AM, Hubel K, Hogan WJ, Maloney DG, Mielcarek M, Martin PJ, Flowers MED, Georges GE, Woolfrey AE, Deeg JH, Scott BL, McDonald GB, Storb R, Sandmaier BM. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with non-myeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies: Improved outcomes over two decades. Haematologica. 2021 Jun 1;106(6):1599-1607. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.248187.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32499241 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2012-00580

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P01CA018029

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1623.00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id