Reduced Intensity Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With High Risk Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia in Complete Remission
NCT ID: NCT00031655
Last Updated: 2012-12-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2001-09-30
2012-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To determine if a one-year disease-free survival (DFS) of \> 25% can be achieved among adult patients with high risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in complete remission (CR) who undergo nonmyeloablative allografting.
II. To determine if a one-year DFS of \>= 40% can be achieved among pediatric patients with high risk ALL in CR who undergo nonmyeloablative allografting.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine if a day +200 transplant-related mortality (TRM) of \< 25% can be achieved among patients with high risk ALL in CR who undergo nonmyeloablative allografting.
II. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in the treatment of minimal residue disease (MRD) after nonmyeloablative allografting for patients with high risk ALL in CR.
OUTLINE:
NONMYELOALATIVE CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) on days -4 to -2 and undergo total body irradiation (TBI) on day 0.
TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) on day 0. Patients with minimal residual disease may receive donor lymphocyte infusion IV.
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION: Patients receive cyclosporine orally (PO) every 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper to day 177 and mycophenolate mofetil PO very 8 hours on days 0 to 40 with taper to day 96.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at days 28, 56, 84, 120, 180, and 360; at 18 months; and annually for up to 5 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment (nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT)
NONMYELOALATIVE CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV on days -4 to -2 and undergo TBI on day 0.
TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic PBSCT on day 0. Patients with minimal residual disease may receive donor lymphocyte infusion IV.
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION: Patients receive cyclosporine PO every 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper to day 177 and mycophenolate mofetil PO very 8 hours on days 0 to 40 with taper to day 96.
nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Undergo nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT
donor lymphocytes
Given IV
cyclosporine
Given PO
total-body irradiation
Undergo TBI
fludarabine phosphate
Given IV
mycophenolate mofetil
Given PO
laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Undergo nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Undergo nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT
donor lymphocytes
Given IV
cyclosporine
Given PO
total-body irradiation
Undergo TBI
fludarabine phosphate
Given IV
mycophenolate mofetil
Given PO
laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Undergo nonmyeloablative allogeneic PBSCT
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients 50-75 years old with high risk ALL in first CR (CR1) or ALL in CR \>= second CR (CR2)
* Patients \>= 18 years old and \< 50 years old with high risk ALL in CR1 who are not eligible for a conventional allogeneic transplantation based on general medical condition
* Patients \>= 18 years old and \< 50 years old with high risk ALL in CR1 who refuse a conventional allogeneic transplant
* Patients \>= 18 years old and \< 50 years old with ALL in CR \>= CR2 who are not eligible for a conventional allogeneic transplantation based on general medical condition
* Patients \>= 18 years old and \< 50 years old with high risk ALL in CR \>= CR2 who refuse a conventional allogeneic transplant
* CR is defined as \< 5% blasts by morphology on a bone marrow aspirate and the absence of peripheral blasts
* High risk adult ALL in CR1 includes those patients with one or more of the following:
* Age \>=30 years
* Non T-cell phenotype
* Cytogenetic abnormalities including t(9;22), t(4;11), trisomy 8, or monosomy 7
* Failure to achieve CR after 4 weeks of induction chemotherapy
* PEDIATRIC PATIENTS:
* Patients \< 18 years old with ALL in high risk CR1 who are not candidates for conventional allogeneic transplantation based on general medical condition
* Patients \< 18 years old with ALL in CR \>= CR2 who are not candidates for conventional allogeneic transplantation based on general medical condition
* Patients \< 12 years old require approval by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) principal investigator prior to enrollment
* CR is defined as \< 5% blasts by morphology on a bone marrow aspirate and absence of peripheral blasts
* High risk pediatric ALL in CR1 includes those patients with one or more of the following:
* Cytogenetic abnormalities including:
* t(9;22) with a white blood cell (WBC) \>= 25,000 at diagnosis or
* t(4;11) in patients \< 1 year old and \>= 10 years old or
* Hypodiploidy (\< 45 chromosomes)
* Failure to achieve CR after 4 weeks of induction chemotherapy
* Persistent peripheral blasts after one week of induction chemotherapy
* DONOR: FHCRC matching Grade 2.1: Unrelated donors who are prospectively:
* Matched for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1 and DQB1 alleles (must be defined by high resolution typing) and
* Only a single allele disparity will be allowed for HLA-A, B, or C as defined by high resolution typing
* DONOR: A positive anti-donor cytotoxic crossmatch is an absolute donor exclusion; donors are excluded when preexisting immunoreactivity is identified that would jeopardize donor hematopoietic cell engraftment; this determination is based on the standard practice of the individual institution; the recommended procedure for patients with 10 of 10 HLA allele level (phenotypic) match is to obtain a panel reactive antibody (PRA) screens to class I and class II antigens for all patients before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT); if the PRA shows \> 10% activity, then flow cytometric or B and T cell cytotoxic cross matches should be obtained; the donor should be excluded if any of the cytotoxic cross match assays are positive; for those patients with an HLA class I allele mismatch, flow cytometric or B and T cell cytotoxic cross matches should be obtained regardless of the PRA results
* DONOR: Patient and donor pairs homozygous at a mismatched allele are considered a two-allele mismatch, i.e., the patient is A\*0101 and the donor is A\*0102, and this type of mismatch is not allowed
* DONOR: Donor must consent to peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization with filgrastim (G-CSF) arranged through the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) or other donor centers
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of circulating leukemic blasts (in the peripheral blood) detected by standard pathology
* Fertile men or women unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following treatment
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity
* ORGAN DYSFUNCTION, ADULT CRITERIA:
* Requiring supplementary continuous oxygen OR diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \< 40%
* Cardiac ejection fraction \< 35%
* Patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of liver disease would be evaluated for the cause of liver disease, its clinical severity in terms of liver function, and the degree of portal hypertension; patients will be excluded if they are found to have fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis of the liver with evidence of portal hypertension, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, a history of bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, uncorrectable hepatic synthetic dysfunction evinced by prolongation of the prothrombin time, ascites related to portal hypertension, bridging fibrosis, bacterial or fungal liver abscess, biliary obstruction, chronic viral hepatitis with total serum bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL, and symptomatic biliary disease
* Karnofsky performance score \< 50
* ORGAN DYSFUNCTION, PEDIATRIC CRITERIA:
* Lansky play-performance score \< 40
* Patients with active non-hematologic malignancies (except non-melanoma skin cancers)
* Patients with a history of non-hematologic malignancies (except non-melanoma skin cancers) currently in a complete remission, who are less than 5 years from the time of complete remission, and have a \> 20% risk of disease recurrence
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
George Georges
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oregon Health and Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System
Seattle, Washington, United States
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cooper JP, Storer BE, Granot N, Gyurkocza B, Sorror ML, Chauncey TR, Shizuru J, Franke GN, Maris MB, Boyer M, Bruno B, Sahebi F, Langston AA, Hari P, Agura ED, Lykke Petersen S, Maziarz RT, Bethge W, Asch J, Gutman JA, Olesen G, Yeager AM, Hubel K, Hogan WJ, Maloney DG, Mielcarek M, Martin PJ, Flowers MED, Georges GE, Woolfrey AE, Deeg JH, Scott BL, McDonald GB, Storb R, Sandmaier BM. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with non-myeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies: Improved outcomes over two decades. Haematologica. 2021 Jun 1;106(6):1599-1607. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.248187.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2012-00580
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
1623.00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id