Study Comparing Zevalin Regimen With no Further Treatment in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.
NCT ID: NCT00322218
Last Updated: 2022-01-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-05-31
2008-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Zevalin Versus Observation in Participants at Least 60 Years Old With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Negative Complete Remission After Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHOP) or R-CHOP-like Therapy
NCT01510184
Yt90 Zevalin and Combination Chemotherapy (Z-CHOP)in Treating Patients With Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
NCT00386321
Zevalin Twice in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
NCT00902525
Phase 3 Study of Zevalin Following R-CVP in Previously Untreated Patients With Follicular Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
NCT00384111
Study for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of SH L 749 to Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT00220285
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
End Points:
Primary endpoint: Overall survival (OS) Secondary endpoints: Disease-free survival (DFS), health-related quality of life (HRQL) as assessed by the patient using standard questionnaires .
Number of Patients :
A total of 400 patients (200 per arm) were planned to be enrolled.
\- In fact, 68 randomized patients (full analysis set; FAS) were analysed; 34 patients per each arm. The per-protocol set (PPS; 65 patients) comprised 33 patients allocated to the Zevalin arm and 32 patients allocated to the observation control arm.
Study Treatment :
The combination regimen with rituximab was designed in 2 steps as follows:
* Day 1: Initial administration of 250 mg/m\^2 rituximab, followed immediately by administration of 185 megabecquerel (MBq) (5 millicurie \[mCi\]) of \[111In\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan (the latter one only in centers where biodistribution imaging or dosimetry was compulsory according to local law). In centers where biodistribution imaging or dosimetry had not been required, the first rituximab infusion was given alone.
* Day 7-9: Rituximab 250 mg/m\^2, followed immediately by \[90Y\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 megabecquerel/kilograms (MBq/kg) (0.4 millicurie / kilogram \[mCi/kg\]) (maximum dose 1184 MBq) given as a slow intravenous (I.V.) push over 10 minutes. Two treatment days one week apart followed by a 12-week safety period.
Duration of Patient Participation:
Due to the sequential design, the total duration of this study was not fixed. Originally, the study was planned in a randomized, parallel-group, group sequential design.
Objective :
The primary objective of this study was an inferential comparison between the 2 randomized groups in terms of overall survival using a group sequential triangular test ,since the study was prematurely terminated the pre-planned group-sequential nature of the study design was not applicable statistical analyses. Actually, the prominent efficacy variables for the OS and DFS were analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and PPS using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group.
Study Design :
This study was designed as a prospective, multi-center, open label, randomized, two-armed, group-sequential Phase III study. The study was planned to consist of 2 stages: an interventional Stage 1 with Screening/Baseline, treatment, safety, and follow-up periods, and a non-interventional Stage 2 consisting of a long-term follow-up period (until completion of a median observation period of 5 years). This second stage of the study was to be started only if superiority of the Zevalin study regimen could be demonstrated in the preceding Stage 1.
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamic results: Not applicable
Extent of exposure:
All 34 patients randomized to the Zevalin arm were given 2 rituximab infusions(with a median dose of 425.0 mg at each of the 2 infusion time points).Three patients underwent radioimaging studies/dosimetry and therefore were administered \[111In\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan at Day 1. All but 1 patient received an infusion with \[90Y\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan following the second infusion of rituximab. The mean dose ranged from 765.9 -1197.0 MBq.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Zevalin
Patients received Zevalin.
Zevalin Therapeutic Regimen:
Day 1: Initial administration of 250 mg/m\^2 rituximab, followed immediately by administration of 185 MBq of \[111In\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan ,in centers where centers where biodistribution imaging or dosimetry had not been required, the first rituximab infusion was given alone.
\- Day 7-9: Rituximab 250 mg/m\^2, followed immediately by \[90Y\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 MBq/kg given as a slow intravenous push over 10 minutes.
Two treatment days one week apart were followed by a 12-week safety period.
Zevalin
Zevalin study treatment regimen consisted of 2 rituximab i.v. infusions (Day 1 and Day 7-9) and one \[90Y\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan infusion in connection with the second rituximab infusion.
The core treatment regimen in the Zevalin arm was:
Day 1: Rituximab i.v. infusion 250 mg/m\^2
Day 7-to 9: Rituximab i.v. infusion 250 mg/m\^2 immediately followed by \[90Y\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 MBq/kg (0.4 mCi/kg) with a maximum dose of 1184 MBq (32 mCi),administered as slow intravenous push over 10 minutes.
Observational
Patients in this arm did not receive any reference therapy; they remained free of any anti-lymphoma therapy and were observed for relapse. This was non-interventional Stage consisting of a longterm follow-up period (until completion of a median observation period of 5 years).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Zevalin
Zevalin study treatment regimen consisted of 2 rituximab i.v. infusions (Day 1 and Day 7-9) and one \[90Y\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan infusion in connection with the second rituximab infusion.
The core treatment regimen in the Zevalin arm was:
Day 1: Rituximab i.v. infusion 250 mg/m\^2
Day 7-to 9: Rituximab i.v. infusion 250 mg/m\^2 immediately followed by \[90Y\]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 MBq/kg (0.4 mCi/kg) with a maximum dose of 1184 MBq (32 mCi),administered as slow intravenous push over 10 minutes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Central pathology review confirming the DLBCL diagnosis and Cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) positivity, and no evidence of DLBCL in bone marrow
* First-line treatment of DLBCL must have been 6 or 8 cycles of standard CHOP chemotherapy in combination with rituximab .
* Complete remission(CR) or unconfirmed complete remission(CRu) according to the International Workshop Response Criteria for Non Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL) described by Cheson et al and modified for this study after first-line treatment with CHOP-R. Computerised Tomography (CT) scans of chest, abdomen, pelvis, and neck (if applicable) must have been performed within 6 weeks after the last dose of the last course of CHOP-R. Applicability of the neck CT means that the patient had involvement of the neck region by palpation / physical examination at first diagnosis (pre-CHOP-R).
* Central radiographic review of the CT scans from before and after first-line treatment with CHOP-R fulfilling the radiological requirements for CR/CRu
* Patients 60 years of age or older at time of randomization
* WHO performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 within 1 week of randomization
* Absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10\^9/L within 1 week of randomization
* Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10 g/dL within 1 week of randomization
* Platelets greater than or equal to 150 x 10\^9/L within 1 week of randomization
* Life expectancy of 3 months or longer
* Written informed consent obtained according to local guidelines
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior radioimmunotherapy, radiation therapy, or any other NHL therapy except first-line CHOP-R
* Presence of gastric, central nervous system or testicular lymphoma at first diagnosis
* Histological transformation of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)
* Known seropositivity for hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B surface antigen
* Known history of Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
* Abnormal liver function: total bilirubin \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or Alanine Aminotransferase \> 2.5 x ULN within 1 week of randomization
* Abnormal renal function: serum creatinine \> 2.0 x ULN within 1 week of randomization
* Nonrecovery from the toxic effects of CHOP-R therapy
* Known hypersensitivity to murine or chimeric antibodies or proteins
* Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) or Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) therapy within two weeks (or four weeks if pegylated) prior to screening laboratory sampling
* Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes,congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within 6 months of study, unstable and uncontrolled hypertension, chronic renal disease, or active uncontrolled infection) which could compromise participation in the study
* Male and female patients of child-bearing potential unwilling to practice effective contraception during the study and unwilling or unable to continue contraception for 12 months after their last dose of study treatment
* Female patients who are pregnant or are currently breastfeeding
* Treatment with investigational drugs less than 4 weeks before the planned Day 1 or nonrecovery from the toxic effects of such therapy
* Surgery less than 4 weeks before the planned Day 1 or nonrecovery from the side effects of such surgery
* Concurrent systemic corticosteroid use for any reason except as premedication in case of known or suspected allergies to contrast media or as premedication for potential side effects of rituximab treatment
* Unwillingness or inability to comply with the protocol
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bayer
INDUSTRY
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Research Site
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Research Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Research site
Bakersfield, California, United States
Research Site
Berkeley, California, United States
Research Site
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Research Site
Burbank, California, United States
Research Site
Duarte, California, United States
Research site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Research site
Newport Beach, California, United States
Research Site
San Diego, California, United States
Research site
Vallejo, California, United States
Research site
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Research site
Newark, Delaware, United States
Research site
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Research Site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
Research site
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Research site
Joliet, Illinois, United States
Research Site
Morris, Illinois, United States
Research site
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Research Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Research site
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Research site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Research site
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Research Site
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Research Site
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
Research Site
Commack, New York, United States
Research Site
East Setauket, New York, United States
Research Site
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Research Site
Aberdeen, South Dakota, United States
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
Research Site
Houston, Texas, United States
Research Site
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Research Site
Graz, , Austria
Research Site
Innsbruck, , Austria
Research Site
Bruges, , Belgium
Research Site
Ghent, , Belgium
Research Site
Leuven, , Belgium
Research Site
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Research Site
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Helsinki, , Finland
Research Site
Oulu, , Finland
Research Site
Créteil, , France
Research Site
Dijon, , France
Research Site
Lille, , France
Research Site
Limoges, , France
Research Site, Cedax
Lyon, , France
Research Site
Paris, , France
Research Site
Toulouse, , France
Research Site
Chemnitz, , Germany
Research Site
Jena, , Germany
Research Site
Karlsruhe, , Germany
Research Site
Mainz, , Germany
Research Site
Rostock, , Germany
Research Site
Würzburg, , Germany
Research Site
Budapest, , Hungary
Research Site
Debrecen, , Hungary
Research Site
Szeged, , Hungary
Research Site
Dublin, , Ireland
Research Site
Galway, , Ireland
Research Site
Bologna, , Italy
Research Site
Milan, , Italy
Research Site
Perugia, , Italy
Research Site
Pisa, , Italy
Research Site
Torino, , Italy
Research Site
Gdansk, , Poland
Research Site
Krakow, , Poland
Research Site
Poznan, , Poland
Research Site
Warsaw, , Poland
Research Site
Coimbra, , Portugal
Research Site
Lisbon, , Portugal
Research Site
Porto, , Portugal
Research Site
Singapore, , Singapore
Research Site, Yonsei
Seoul, , South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, , South Korea
Research Site
Madrid, , Spain
Research Site
Pamplona, , Spain
Research Site
Salamanca, , Spain
Research Site
Seville, , Spain
Research Site
Malmo, , Sweden
Research Site
Uddevalla, , Sweden
Research Site
Umeå, , Sweden
Research Site
Bern, , Switzerland
Research Site
Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland
Research Site
Bangkok, , Thailand
Research Site
Leicester, , United Kingdom
Research Site
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
307940/106-20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.