Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol
NCT ID: NCT00321022
Last Updated: 2012-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
154 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-08-31
2005-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The secondary objectives are to evaluate the potential role of a TIA risk stratification tool and to determine the time to a diagnostic endpoint in both groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study of Low-dose Intracoronary Thrombolytic Therapy in STEMI (Heart Attack) Patients.
NCT03998319
Efficacy and Safety of Prehospital Administration of Bivalirudin in STEMI Patients
NCT00391326
Adjunctive, Low-dose tPA in Primary PCI for STEMI
NCT03335839
Bivalirudin vs Heparin in NSTEMI and STEMI in Patients on Modern Antiplatelet Therapy in SWEDEHEART
NCT02311231
Study Of Costs Realized After Percutaneous Coronary intervenTion Employing Same Day Discharge
NCT02207270
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The management and disposition of emergency department patients with TIA is not entirely clear. It is mutually agreed upon in guidelines written by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the National Stroke Association (NSA) for the management of TIA, and standard emergency medicine textbooks, that patients with symptoms suggestive of a stroke or TIA require urgent evaluation in a setting such as the emergency department. Furthermore, that this evaluation should include a history, physical, and ECG. AHA guidelines and emergency medicine texts recommend that the initial evaluation include appropriate blood testing based on the history and CT imaging of the brain. All agree that patients with noncardioembolic causes of TIA should receive antiplatelet therapy and that TIA patients with atrial fibrillation should receive anticoagulation. "Prompt" or "Urgent" imaging of the carotid arteries to detect stenosis greater than 70% is also agreed upon since urgent carotid endarterectomy is believed to be most beneficial in this group. However the optimal timing of endarterectomy in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis is unclear. NSA guidelines and emergency medicine texts recommend hospitalization of patients with new onset TIA if imaging studies, such as carotid doppler, can not be performed urgently. However in a separate review of TIA management, hospitalization was identified as an area of uncertainty and it was suggested that management in a setting such as an Emergency Department Observation Unit (EDOU) might be a more cost effective alternative.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Emergency Department Observational Unit
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Negative HCT
Exclusion Criteria
* Possible embolic source - A. fib, paroxysmal.A.fib, cardiomyopathy, artificial heart valve, endocarditis, patent foramen ovale, recent MI
* Known carotid stenosis (\>50%) or mural thrombus
* Persistent acute neurological deficits
* Crescendo TIAs
* Non-focal symptoms - ie confusion, weakness, seizure, transient global amnesia
* Hypertensive encephalophy / emergency
* Severe headache or evidence of cranial arteritis
* Fever
* Previous stroke
* Severe dementia
* Nursing home patient
* Social issues that make discharge or follow up unlikely
* Other acute medical problems requiring inpatient admission
* Patient unlikely to survive beyond study follow up period (90 days)
* History of IV drug use
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Foundation for Education and Research in Neurological Emergencies
OTHER
William Beaumont Hospitals
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael A Ross, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
William Beaumont Hospital, Wayne State University School of Medicine
Brian J O'Neil, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
William Beaumont Hospital, Wayne State University School of Medicine
Philip Kilanowski, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
William Beaumont Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2003-020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.