Same Day Versus Next Day Discharge: Ambulatory Closure Device Percutaneous Intervention

NCT ID: NCT01230606

Last Updated: 2011-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

303 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multi-center trial that will evaluate the safety, feasibility, and cost effectiveness of discharging patients, who have had successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and deployment of the AngiomaxTM closure device, 6 hours after against 24 hours after the procedure. Patients will be randomized in a 3 (test): 1 (control) fashion and will have a study population of 600 patients over 6 investigational sites all within the United States. Patients \<65 years old will be chosen in order to stay within the low risk group and will be followed up after 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days via phone or office visit. The primary endpoint will be a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, and the incidence of major bleeding or vascular complications. Data acquired from the study, such as blinded financial information and patient satisfaction surveys, will be used in order to evaluate cost analysis and safety of the procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Closure devices are a relatively new method for sealing the femoral arterial puncture following procedures including percutaneous intervention (PCI). Because the risk of severe complications (e.g., bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality) associated with PCI when closure devices are very low, many patients undergoing PCI may be considered eligible for a same day hospital discharge. As the practice of ambulatory PCI is becoming more common, it is important to evaluate the readiness of patients under-going PCI for same-day discharge and anxiety and coping abilities of patients post-discharge. Our hypothesis is that same day discharge of patients who have undergone a PCI procedure with closure using a vascular closure device is safe, patients will be comfortable with a same day discharge and this process will be more cost efficient than the current standard of staying in the hospital overnight. The current pilot study is a multi-center, randomized parallel arm, controlled trial of low-risk patients undergoing an elective PCI procedure. Overall, 600 patients will be enrolled. After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to leave the hospital on the same day as the PCI procedure or stay overnight in a 1:1 ratio. Data collection includes a self-administered questionnaire at hospital discharge, telephone interviews at 7-days and 30-days post-hospital discharge, and chart abstraction. The primary outcome for this study is differences across randomization arm in patient satisfaction scores on the validated 10-item Post-discharge coping difficulty scale assessed 7 days post-discharge. Secondary outcomes will include differences across randomization group for symptoms of anxiety, readiness for hospital discharge, patient satisfaction with the timing of their discharge, post-procedure pain and soreness, and cost-savings. While a data safety monitoring board will track all adverse events (i.e., myocardial infarction, hematoma, hospitalizations, and mortality), we anticipate too few events to occur to make meaningful inferences beyond that PCI is safe regardless of the timing of hospital discharge. The data from this pilot study will determine the comfort patients experience after undergoing PCI with an ambulatory (i.e, same-day) hospital discharge. Furthermore, this pilot study will provide the foundation for a large scale non-inferiority study of same-day discharge on outcomes including myocardial infarction, bleeding, and mortality. Such data will indicate the overall feasibility of early ambulatory PCI and has the potential to radically alter health care delivery following PCI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

overnight

Subjects that stay overnight at the hospital.

discharge vs. overnight stay

Intervention Type OTHER

At six hours post-PCI,patients will be randomized to be discharged immediately or to stay overnight in the hospital for observation and discharged the following day. Randomization will occur in a 1:1 ratio. Additionally, randomization will be performed stratified by study site.

Next Day Discharge

Subjects that are discharged on the same day of the procedure.

discharge vs. overnight stay

Intervention Type OTHER

At six hours post-PCI,patients will be randomized to be discharged immediately or to stay overnight in the hospital for observation and discharged the following day. Randomization will occur in a 1:1 ratio. Additionally, randomization will be performed stratified by study site.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

discharge vs. overnight stay

At six hours post-PCI,patients will be randomized to be discharged immediately or to stay overnight in the hospital for observation and discharged the following day. Randomization will occur in a 1:1 ratio. Additionally, randomization will be performed stratified by study site.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

. \<75 years of age at the time of procedure.

2\. Patient has a type A or B lesion(s)

3\. Femoral access site is amenable to closure with a vascular closure device.

4\. Over 2 hours since the completion of the PCI procedure (at least 2 hours must elapse from completion of the PCI before subjects become eligible).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient has a life expectancy less than 12 months.
2. Patient has recent evidence of an acute coronary syndrome (MI)
3. Femoral access is difficult or site is not amenable to closure device
4. Anticoagulants other than unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin were used during the procedure (i.e. enoxaparin).
5. Patient has sub optimal angiographic outcome or clinical complication(s) during PCI
6. The PCI occurred in something other than a native coronary artery
7. Angiographic evidence of thrombus
8. Patient has more than 3 stents implanted during this PCI
9. Patient has an INR \>2, Platelet count \<100,000 or Hematocrit \<25
10. Occlusion of major side branch during PCI of \>1.5mm
11. Patient has ejection fraction ≤30%
12. Known allergy to PCI procedural medications
13. Patient reports living further than 30 minutes from a hospital by ambulance.
14. Patient provides informed consent and agrees to the follow-up schedule.
15. Evidence of vascular complication(s) (e.g. dissection, hematoma, bleeding) peri-procedure
16. Patient is pregnant
17. Evidence of infection (e.g. fever, pus, swelling) peri-procedure
18. Patients with chronic renal insufficiency (e.g. serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael C Kim, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Baylor University Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim M, Muntner P, Sharma S, Choi JW, Stoler RC, Woodward M, Mann DM, Farkouh ME. Assessing patient-reported outcomes and preferences for same-day discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a pilot randomized, controlled trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Mar 1;6(2):186-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000069. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23481528 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GCO 07-1324

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Delayed Postconditioning
NCT01483755 COMPLETED PHASE2
The RECOVER IV Trial
NCT05506449 TERMINATED NA