Recurrent or Persistent Device Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: The RE-DRT Study
NCT ID: NCT06177704
Last Updated: 2024-07-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-08-01
2028-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
While LAAO has shown efficacy in reducing the risk of stroke, device-related thrombus (DRT) remains a significant concern. The reported incidence of DRT varies, and it is associated with an elevated risk of ischemic stroke and death. The study highlights that persistent and recurrent DRT pose higher risks of thromboembolic events, and current data come from retrospective studies with non-standardized imaging follow-up protocols. The timing of imaging follow-up is crucial, and the study notes discrepancies in recommendations from expert statements. The EHRA/EAPCI suggests imaging at specific intervals post-procedure, while the SCAI/HRS recommends repeat imaging at shorter intervals to assess DRT resolution. The study underscores the need for dedicated prospective data to accurately determine the incidence, factors, and clinical impact of persistent and recurrent DRT after LAAO.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Thrombectomy and Improvement of Left Ventricular Function in AMI
NCT00288665
Thrombus Aspiration in ThrOmbus Containing culpRiT Lesions in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (TATORT-NSTEMI)
NCT01612312
Coronary Angiography in Critically Ill Patients With Type II Myocardial Infarction
NCT04043091
Anti-CoagulaTion on Left Ventricular Thrombus After ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT05892042
CompariSon of Manual Aspiration With Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Patients Undergoing Primary PCI. The SMART-PCI Trial
NCT01281033
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Both persistent and recurrent DRT have been linked to an increased risk of thromboembolic events when compared to resolved DRT. In the pooled analysis of data from the PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL trials, around 12% of embolic events in patients with DRT occurred in the presence of multiple DRT episodes. The incidence of persistent DRT has been reported in one out of three patients diagnosed with DRT, with DRT recurrence occurring in one out of five patients. However, the real incidence of persistent and recurrent DRT is uncertain, as current data come from retrospective studies with non-standardized imaging follow-up protocols. This situation leads to a significant number of missed cases, increases the risk of bias, and likely underestimates the rate of persistent and recurrent DRT. The timing of the imaging follow-up can significantly affect the incidence of DRT. In consecutive patients examined through a pre-specified protocol, the incidence of specific findings would be much more accurate compared to imaging examinations based exclusively on a single adverse clinical event, where the real incidence and clinical associations cannot be accurately determined.
The EHRA/EAPCI expert LAAO statement recommends imaging within 6-24 weeks and then 12 months post-procedure, with no mention of imaging follow-up in case of persistent or recurrent DRT. In contrast, the recent SCAI/HRS expert consensus statement on transcatheter LAAO suggests that repeat imaging at 45- to 90-day intervals can be conducted to assess for DRT resolution and consider the eventual cessation of anticoagulation, although there is no evidence that support this recommendation. Finally, considering the substantial rate of recurrent DRT and its clinical implications, a long-term and sequential imaging follow-up strategy may be warranted. Therefore, there is an unmet need for dedicated prospective data to determine the real incidence, related factors, and clinical impact of persistent and recurrent DRT after LAAO.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with diagnosis of probable/definite DRT after LAAO
Patients with diagnosis of probable/definite DRT after LAAO detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or cardiac computed tomography (CT).
In all patients after the LAAO procedure, a first imaging evaluation at 45 to 90 days, and a second imaging evaluation at 12 months is recommended.
In case of DRT diagnosis, and following the recent SCAI/HRS recommendations, a repeat imaging at 45- to 90-day intervals is recommended to assess for DRT resolution with eventual cessation of anticoagulation.
In case of DRT resolution, a sequential imaging evaluation at ±90-day, ±180-day, and ±365 days after the imaging test where DRT was resolved is recommended
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age≥18 years old.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Josep Rodes-Cabau
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IUCPQ-UL
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mesnier J, Simard T, Jung RG, Lehenbauer KR, Piayda K, Pracon R, Jackson GG, Flores-Umanzor E, Faroux L, Korsholm K, Chun JKR, Chen S, Maarse M, Montrella K, Chaker Z, Spoon JN, Pastormerlo LE, Meincke F, Sawant AC, Moldovan CM, Qintar M, Aktas MK, Branca L, Radinovic A, Ram P, El-Zein RS, Flautt T, Ding WY, Sayegh B, Benito-Gonzalez T, Lee OH, Badejoko SO, Paitazoglou C, Karim N, Zaghloul AM, Agarwal H, Kaplan RM, Alli O, Ahmed A, Suradi HS, Knight BP, Alla VM, Panaich SS, Wong T, Bergmann MW, Chothia R, Kim JS, Perez de Prado A, Bazaz R, Gupta D, Valderrabano M, Sanchez CE, El Chami MF, Mazzone P, Adamo M, Ling F, Wang DD, O'Neill W, Wojakowski W, Pershad A, Berti S, Spoon DB, Kawsara A, Jabbour G, Boersma LVA, Schmidt B, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Freixa X, Ellis CR, Fauchier L, Demkow M, Sievert H, Main ML, Hibbert B, Holmes DR Jr, Alkhouli M, Rodes-Cabau J. Persistent and Recurrent Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov 27;16(22):2722-2732. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.09.017.
Saw J, Holmes DR, Cavalcante JL, Freeman JV, Goldsweig AM, Kavinsky CJ, Moussa ID, Munger TM, Price MJ, Reisman M, Sherwood MW, Turi ZG, Wang DD, Whisenant BK. SCAI/HRS expert consensus statement on transcatheter left atrial appendage closure. Heart Rhythm. 2023 May;20(5):e1-e16. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
Tzikas A, Holmes DR Jr, Gafoor S, Ruiz CE, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Diener HC, Cappato R, Kar S, Lee RJ, Byrne RA, Ibrahim R, Lakkireddy D, Soliman OI, Nabauer M, Schneider S, Brachmann J, Saver JL, Tiemann K, Sievert H, Camm AJ, Lewalter T. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: the Munich consensus document on definitions, endpoints, and data collection requirements for clinical studies. Europace. 2017 Jan;19(1):4-15. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw141. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
Holmes DR Jr, Korsholm K, Rodes-Cabau J, Saw J, Berti S, Alkhouli MA. Left atrial appendage occlusion. EuroIntervention. 2023 Feb 6;18(13):e1038-e1065. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627.
Holmes DR Jr, Reddy VY, Gordon NT, Delurgio D, Doshi SK, Desai AJ, Stone JE Jr, Kar S. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2878-2889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.064.
Simard TJ, Hibbert B, Alkhouli MA, Abraham NS, Holmes DR Jr. Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion. EuroIntervention. 2022 Jun 24;18(3):224-232. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010.
Alkhouli M, Alarouri H, Kramer A, Korsholm K, Collins J, De Backer O, Hatoum H, Nielsen-Kudsk JE. Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Clinical Impact, Predictors, Classification, and Management. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov 27;16(22):2695-2707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.046.
Alkhouli M, Busu T, Shah K, Osman M, Alqahtani F, Raybuck B. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;4(12):1629-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
Mesnier J, Cepas-Guillen P, Freixa X, Flores-Umanzor E, Hoang Trinh K, O'Hara G, Rodes-Cabau J. Antithrombotic Management After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May;16(5):e012812. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012812. Epub 2023 May 16.
Asmarats L, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Nombela-Franco L, Arzamendi D, Peral V, Nietlispach F, Latib A, Maffeo D, Gonzalez-Ferreiro R, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Agudelo V, Alamar M, Ghenzi RA, Mangieri A, Bernier M, Rodes-Cabau J. Recurrence of Device-Related Thrombus After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure. Circulation. 2019 Oct 22;140(17):1441-1443. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040860. Epub 2019 Oct 21. No abstract available.
Sedaghat A, Vij V, Al-Kassou B, Gloekler S, Galea R, Furholz M, Meier B, Valgimigli M, O'Hara G, Arzamendi D, Agudelo V, Asmarats L, Freixa X, Flores-Umanzor E, De Backer O, Sondergaard L, Nombela-Franco L, McInerney A, Korsholm K, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Afzal S, Zeus T, Operhalski F, Schmidt B, Montalescot G, Guedeney P, Iriart X, Miton N, Saw J, Gilhofer T, Fauchier L, Veliqi E, Meincke F, Petri N, Nordbeck P, Rycerz S, Ognerubov D, Merkulov E, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Ferreiro R, Bhatt DL, Laricchia A, Mangieri A, Omran H, Schrickel JW, Rodes-Cabau J, Nickenig G. Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Data on Thrombus Characteristics, Treatment Strategies, and Clinical Outcomes From the EUROC-DRT-Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May;14(5):e010195. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010195. Epub 2021 May 18.
Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Kar S, Gibson DN, Price MJ, Huber K, Horton RP, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Gordon NT, Holmes DR Jr; PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Investigators. 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, Mandrola J, Camm AJ, Lip GYH, Fauchier L, Betts TR, Lewalter T, Saw J, Tzikas A, Sternik L, Nietlispach F, Berti S, Sievert H, Bertog S, Meier B; ESC Scientific Document Group. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):184. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz258. Epub 2019 Aug 31. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RE-DRT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.