CP-675,206 Versus Either Dacarbazine Or Temozolomide In Patients Without Prior Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00257205

Last Updated: 2012-07-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

655 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Study Completion Date

2010-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a Phase 3, multi-national, open-label, 2-arm randomized study in patients with surgically incurable metastatic melanoma who have received no prior chemotherapy, or biochemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. The primary objective of this trial is to compare overall survival for patients with advanced melanoma who are randomized to receive CP-675,206 with that of patients who are randomized to receive either dacarbazine or temozolomide (investigator choice)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

B

Choice of one or the other Dacarbazine or Temozolomide(CP-675,206) (choice)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dacarbazine

Intervention Type DRUG

decarbazine 1000 mg/m2 IV Q 21 days x 12

temozolomide

Intervention Type DRUG

temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally on Days 1-5 every 28 days x 12

A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CP-675,206

Intervention Type DRUG

CP-675,206 15 mg/kg IV Q 90 days x 4

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dacarbazine

decarbazine 1000 mg/m2 IV Q 21 days x 12

Intervention Type DRUG

CP-675,206

CP-675,206 15 mg/kg IV Q 90 days x 4

Intervention Type DRUG

temozolomide

temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally on Days 1-5 every 28 days x 12

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

anti-CTLA4 human monoclonal antibody

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Surgically incurable melanoma, either Stage IV or IIIC with N3 status for regional lymph nodes and in-transit or satellite lesions.
* Serum lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH) \<= 2 x ULN
* ECOG performance status of 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria

* Received any systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma except post-surgical adjuvant treatment with cytokines (eg, alpha-interferon or GM-CSF) or with vaccines after complete resection of melanoma.
* History of brain metastases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Corona, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Glendora, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Alamitos, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pomona, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Covina, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Zion, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Beech Grove, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dover, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Federal Way, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lakewood, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Launceston, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Namur, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montpellier, Cedex 05, France

Site Status

Research Site

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Boulogne, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lubin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Obninsk, Kaluga Oblast, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Canada France Germany Greece Israel Italy Mexico Netherlands Poland Russia Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Friedlander P, Wood K, Wassmann K, Christenfeld AM, Bhardwaj N, Oh WK. A whole-blood RNA transcript-based gene signature is associated with the development of CTLA-4 blockade-related diarrhea in patients with advanced melanoma treated with the checkpoint inhibitor tremelimumab. J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Sep 18;6(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0408-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30227886 (View on PubMed)

Ribas A, Kefford R, Marshall MA, Punt CJ, Haanen JB, Marmol M, Garbe C, Gogas H, Schachter J, Linette G, Lorigan P, Kendra KL, Maio M, Trefzer U, Smylie M, McArthur GA, Dreno B, Nathan PD, Mackiewicz J, Kirkwood JM, Gomez-Navarro J, Huang B, Pavlov D, Hauschild A. Phase III randomized clinical trial comparing tremelimumab with standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):616-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.6112. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23295794 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A3671009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.