Dacarbazine and Ipilimumab vs. Dacarbazine With Placebo in Untreated Unresectable Stage III or IV Melanoma

NCT ID: NCT00324155

Last Updated: 2014-11-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

681 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical research study is to examine the safety and effectiveness (how well the drug works) of two different treatments for patients with melanoma. One treatment is an investigational compound (a drug that is not currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration \[FDA\]), know as Ipilimumab (also known as MDX-010 or BMS-734016) together with an approved chemotherapy drug called Dacarbazine

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For the extension phase:

Allocation: single arm study; Masking: open label; Intervention Model: Single Group

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: Ipilimumab and Dacarbazine

In Maintenance phase: Ipilimumab will be continued. Dacarbazine was given up to Week 22 and is not given in the Maintenance phase

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ipilimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous solution; intravenous; 10mg/kg; one dose every 3 weeks for 10 weeks then one dose every 12 weeks starting at Week 24, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent

In Maintenance phase: Only Ipilimumab: 10mg/kg, every 12 weeks will be continued until disease progression

Dacarbazine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous solution; intravenous; 850 mg/m\^2; one dose every 3 weeks for 22 weeks, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent

Arm B: Placebo and Dacarbazine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous solution; intravenous; 0 mg; one dose every 3 weeks for 10 weeks then one dose every 12 weeks starting at Week 24; until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent

Dacarbazine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous solution; intravenous; 850 mg/m\^2; one dose every 3 weeks for 22 weeks, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ipilimumab

Intravenous solution; intravenous; 10mg/kg; one dose every 3 weeks for 10 weeks then one dose every 12 weeks starting at Week 24, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent

In Maintenance phase: Only Ipilimumab: 10mg/kg, every 12 weeks will be continued until disease progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intravenous solution; intravenous; 0 mg; one dose every 3 weeks for 10 weeks then one dose every 12 weeks starting at Week 24; until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent

Intervention Type DRUG

Dacarbazine

Intravenous solution; intravenous; 850 mg/m\^2; one dose every 3 weeks for 22 weeks, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MDX-010 BMS-734016

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Informed Consent
* Measurable Disease
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1
* Lab / imaging requirements
* Neg for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B (HepB), C
* Men and Women \> 18 years (16 were allowable)
* Prior therapy restriction (adjuvant only)

Exclusion:

* Pregnant / nursing
* Inadequate contraception
* Brain metastasis
* Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medarex

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pacific Cancer Medical Center

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Wilshire Oncology Medical Group Inc

La Verne, California, United States

Site Status

The Angeles Clinic And Research Institute

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Cancer Center

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

Sharp Clinical Oncology Research

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Saint Francis Hospital And Medical Center

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Hematology Oncology, P.C.

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Cancer Specialists Of North Florida Beaches

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando Health, Inc. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hematology Oncology Associates Of The Treasure Coast

Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States

Site Status

University Of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Mid-Illinois Hematology/Oncology Associates, Ltd.

Normal, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oncology Specialists, Sc

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Central Indiana Cancer Centers

Fishers, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Cancer Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Hutchinson Clinic, Pa

Hutchinson, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Kentucky Cancer Clinic

Hazard, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Greater Baltimore Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Sinai Hospital Of Baltimore

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ellis Fischel Cancer Center

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Joseph Oncology Inc

Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States

Site Status

University Of New Mexico Cancer Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Blumenthal Cancer Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Providence Portland Medical Center

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

St. Luke'S Hospital & Health Network

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lowcountry Hematology & Oncology, Pa

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Ctr

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Joe Arrington Cancer Research And Treatment Center

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Virginia Cancer Institute

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Brasschaat, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Porto Alegre, Rs, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Local Institution

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Nantes, Cedex 1, France

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint-Etienne, Cedex 2, France

Site Status

Local Institution

Brest, Cedex, France

Site Status

Local Institution

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

München, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Kaposyar, , Hungary

Site Status

Local Institution

Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland

Site Status

Local Institution

Galway, Galway, Ireland

Site Status

Local Institution

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Local Institution

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Local Institution

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Local Institution

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Ragusa, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Hv Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Wurzburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Montebello, Oslo County, Norway

Site Status

Local Institution

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Local Institution

Pyatigorsk, Stavropol Kray, Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Murmansk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Stavropol, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Groenkloof, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Saxonworld, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Canarias, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Local Institution

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Local Institution

Cherkassy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Local Institution

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Local Institution

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Local Institution

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Local Institution

Bristol, Avon, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Czechia France Germany Hungary Ireland Israel Italy Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Russia South Africa Spain Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maio M, Grob JJ, Aamdal S, Bondarenko I, Robert C, Thomas L, Garbe C, Chiarion-Sileni V, Testori A, Chen TT, Tschaika M, Wolchok JD. Five-year survival rates for treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab plus dacarbazine in a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1191-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6018. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25713437 (View on PubMed)

Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, Weber JS, Margolin K, Hamid O, Patt D, Chen TT, Berman DM, Wolchok JD. Pooled Analysis of Long-Term Survival Data From Phase II and Phase III Trials of Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;33(17):1889-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2736. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25667295 (View on PubMed)

Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, O'Day S, Weber J, Garbe C, Lebbe C, Baurain JF, Testori A, Grob JJ, Davidson N, Richards J, Maio M, Hauschild A, Miller WH Jr, Gascon P, Lotem M, Harmankaya K, Ibrahim R, Francis S, Chen TT, Humphrey R, Hoos A, Wolchok JD. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2517-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104621. Epub 2011 Jun 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21639810 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CA184-024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.