Efficacy Study of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo to Prevent Recurrence After Complete Resection of High Risk Stage III Melanoma

NCT ID: NCT00636168

Last Updated: 2019-12-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1211 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2018-11-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to determine if ipilimumab is effective in preventing or delaying recurrence and prolongs survival after complete resection of high risk stage III melanoma

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High Risk Stage III Melanoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ipilimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

IV solution, IV, 10 mg/kg, 4x every 21 days, then starting from Week 24 every 12 weeks until Week 156 (3 years), disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal

B

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

IV solution, IV, 10 mg/kg, 4x every 21 days then starting from Week 24 every 12 weeks until Week 156 (3 years), disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ipilimumab

IV solution, IV, 10 mg/kg, 4x every 21 days, then starting from Week 24 every 12 weeks until Week 156 (3 years), disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

IV solution, IV, 10 mg/kg, 4x every 21 days then starting from Week 24 every 12 weeks until Week 156 (3 years), disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BMS-734016 MDX-010

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Complete and adequate resection of Stage III melanoma with histologically confirmed melanoma metastatic to lymph node
* Disease-free
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1
* Randomization within 12 weeks of surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior therapy for melanoma except surgery
* Auto-immune disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Angeles Clinic & Research Institute

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Sharp Memorial Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

California Pacific Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

North. Cal. Melanoma Center-St. Mary's Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Yale University School Of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton Comprehensive Cancer Center

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

H Lee Moffitt Cancer Cnt And Res Inst

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Oncology Specialists, S.C.

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Washington University School Of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Nevada Cancer Center

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Atlantic Melanoma Center

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

University Of New Mexico Cancer Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Levine Cancer Institute

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

St Lukes Hospital And Health Network

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Ctr

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Center For Oncology Research & Treatment, P.A.

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Huntsman Cancer Institute At The Univ. Of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Aarhus C, , Denmark

Site Status

Local Institution

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Local Institution

Odense C, , Denmark

Site Status

Local Institution

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Local Institution

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Local Institution

Lillie, Cedex, France

Site Status

Local Institution

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Local Institution

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Pyatigorsk, Stavropol Kray, Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Izhevsk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Krasnoyarsk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Lipetsk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Tomsk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Local Institution

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Local Institution

Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Italy Netherlands Norway Poland Russia Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Weber JS, Middleton MR, Yates G, Sharpe DJ, Kurt M, Lobo M, Moshyk A, Vanderpuye-Orgle J, Mohr P. Estimating Long-Term Survivorship Rates Among Patients With Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma: Analyses From CheckMate 238 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18071 Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;43(8):929-937. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00237. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39378385 (View on PubMed)

Weber JS, Ascierto PA, Middleton MR, Hennicken D, Zoffoli R, Pieters A, Amadi A, Kupas K, Kotapati S, Moshyk A, Schadendorf D. Indirect treatment comparison of nivolumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;158:225-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.028. Epub 2021 Oct 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34663559 (View on PubMed)

Coens C, Suciu S, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, Hamid O, Robert C, Ascierto PA, Richards JM, Lebbe C, Ferraresi V, Smylie M, Weber JS, Maio M, Bottomley A, Kotapati S, de Pril V, Testori A, Eggermont AMM. Health-related quality of life with adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): secondary outcomes of a multinational, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):393-403. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30015-3. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28162999 (View on PubMed)

Eggermont AM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, Hamid O, Robert C, Ascierto PA, Richards JM, Lebbe C, Ferraresi V, Smylie M, Weber JS, Maio M, Bastholt L, Mortier L, Thomas L, Tahir S, Hauschild A, Hassel JC, Hodi FS, Taitt C, de Pril V, de Schaetzen G, Suciu S, Testori A. Prolonged Survival in Stage III Melanoma with Ipilimumab Adjuvant Therapy. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1845-1855. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611299. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27717298 (View on PubMed)

Eggermont AM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, Hamid O, Robert C, Ascierto PA, Richards JM, Lebbe C, Ferraresi V, Smylie M, Weber JS, Maio M, Konto C, Hoos A, de Pril V, Gurunath RK, de Schaetzen G, Suciu S, Testori A. Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 May;16(5):522-30. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70122-1. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25840693 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EORTC 18071

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CA184-029

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id