GSK1120212 vs Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic BRAF V600E/K Mutation-positive Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT01245062
Last Updated: 2018-04-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
322 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-11-22
2016-12-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Comparing GSK2118436 to Dacarbazine (DTIC) in Previously Untreated Subjects With BRAF Mutation Positive Advanced (Stage III) or Metastatic (Stage IV) Melanoma
NCT01227889
Japan PhI/II of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 Combination in Subjects With BRAF V600E/K Mutation Positive Advanced Solid Tumors (Phase I Part) or Cutaneous Melanoma (Phase II Part)
NCT01928940
A Study of GSK2118436 in BRAF Mutant Metastatic Melanoma to the Brain
NCT01266967
A Phase II Study of Single Agent MEK162 in Patients With Advanced Melanoma
NCT01320085
A Study of GSK2118436 in BRAF Mutant Metastatic Melanoma
NCT01153763
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GSK1120212
MEK inhibitor
GSK1120212
MEK inhibitor
Chemotherapy
Investigator Choice of DTIC or paclitaxel
Chemotherapy
Investigator Choice of DTIC or paclitaxel
Crossover
MEK inhibitor after documented progression on Chemotherapy Arm
GSK1120212
MEK inhibitor
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GSK1120212
MEK inhibitor
Chemotherapy
Investigator Choice of DTIC or paclitaxel
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Stage III unresectable (Stage IIIc) or metastatic (Stage IV) cutaneous melanoma which is also determined to be BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive by the central laboratory
* Received no prior treatment or up to one prior regimen of chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic melanoma. Prior treatment with immunotherapy (with the exception of prior ipilimumab, which is only allowed if given in the adjuvant setting), cytokine therapy, biological or vaccine regimen is permitted. Prior use of sorafenib is allowed
* Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
* Women of childbearing potential and men with reproductive potential must agree to use effective contraception during the study. Additionally women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to randomization
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-1
* Adequate screening organ function
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who have received dacarbazine or paclitaxel prior to randomization will not be eligible to receive the same chemotherapy as study medication (i.e. a subject who received prior dacarbazine cannot receive dacarbazine on this trial and would thus receive paclitaxel if randomized to the control arm)
* History of another malignancy. Exception: Subjects who have been disease-free for 3 years, or subjects with a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer or successfully treated in situ carcinoma are eligible. Subjects with second malignancies that are indolent or definitively treated may be enrolled. Consult GSK Medical Monitor if unsure whether second malignancies meet requirements specified above
* Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection (with the exception of chronic or cleared HBV and HCV infection which will be allowed)
* Brain metastases with the following exceptions that are ALL confirmed by the GSK Medical Monitor:
All known lesions must be previously treated with surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery, and Brain lesion(s), if still present, must be confirmed stable (i.e. no increase in lesion size) for ≥90 days prior to randomization (must be documented with two consecutive MRI or CT scans using contrast), and asymptomatic with no corticosteroids requirement for ≥ 30 days prior to randomization, and no enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants for ≥ 30 days prior to randomization
* History or evidence of cardiovascular risk including any of the following:
* QTcB ≥ 480 msec.
* History or evidence of current clinically significant uncontrolled arrhythmias. Exception: Subjects with controlled atrial fibrillation for \>30 days prior to randomization are eligible
* History of acute coronary syndromes (including myocardial infarction and unstable angina), coronary angioplasty, or stenting within 6 months prior to randomization.
* History or evidence of current ≥ Class II congestive heart failure as defined by New York Heart Association
* History of interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis
* History or current evidence / risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or central serous retinopathy (CSR):
* History of RVO or CSR, or predisposing factors to RVO or CSR (e.g. uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, or history of hyperviscosity or hypercoagulability syndromes).
* Visible retinal pathology as assessed by ophthalmic exam that is considered a risk factor for RVO or CSR such as:
* Evidence of new optic disc cupping.
* Intraocular pressure \> 21 mm Hg as measured by tonography
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Metairie, Louisiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
GSK Investigational Site
Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Townsville, Queensland, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Kurralta Park, South Australia, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Woodville, South Australia, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Graz, , Austria
GSK Investigational Site
Vienna, , Austria
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, , Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Charleroi, , Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Ghent, , Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Jette, , Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Kortrijk, , Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Leuven, , Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Wilrijk, , Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Yvoir, , Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Hradec Králové, , Czechia
GSK Investigational Site
Ostrava, , Czechia
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, , Czechia
GSK Investigational Site
Zlín, , Czechia
GSK Investigational Site
Boulogne-Billancourt, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Grenoble, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Montpellier, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Nantes, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Pierre-Bénite, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Rennes, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Tours, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Villejuif, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Buxtehude, Lower Saxony, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, , Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, , Greece
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, , Greece
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, , Greece
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Christchurch, , New Zealand
GSK Investigational Site
Dunedin, , New Zealand
GSK Investigational Site
Newtown, Wellington, , New Zealand
GSK Investigational Site
Oslo, , Norway
GSK Investigational Site
Poznan, , Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, , Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, , Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Chelyabinsk, , Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Magnitogorsk, , Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, , Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Gothenburg, , Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Linköping, , Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Lund, , Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, , Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Uppsala, , Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Zurich, , Switzerland
GSK Investigational Site
Dnipro, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Lviv, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Sumy, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Sympheropol, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Ternopil, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Uzhhorod, , Ukraine
GSK Investigational Site
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Aberdeen, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Chelmsford, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Leeds, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
London, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
London, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Manchester, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Oxford, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Southampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
KT Flaherty, C Robert, P Hersey, P Nathan, C Garbe, M Milhem, L Demidov, J Hassel, P Rutkowski, P Mohr, R Dummer, U Trefzer, JMG Larkin, J Utikal, B Dreno, M Nyakas, MR Middleton, JC Becker, M Casey, LJ Sherman, FS Wu, D Ouellet, AM Martin, K Patel, & D S. MEK inhibition improves survival in Melanoma with activating BRAF Mutations. [N Engl J Med]. 2012;367:107-14.
Flaherty KT, Robert C, Hersey P, Nathan P, Garbe C, Milhem M, Demidov LV, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, Mohr P, Dummer R, Trefzer U, Larkin JM, Utikal J, Dreno B, Nyakas M, Middleton MR, Becker JC, Casey M, Sherman LJ, Wu FS, Ouellet D, Martin AM, Patel K, Schadendorf D; METRIC Study Group. Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 12;367(2):107-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203421. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
Robert C, Flaherty K, Nathan P, Hersey P, Garbe C, Milhem M, Demidov L, Mohr P, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, Dummer R, Utikal J, Kiecker F, Larkin J, D'Amelio A Jr, Mookerjee B, Schadendorf D. Five-year outcomes from a phase 3 METRIC study in patients with BRAF V600 E/K-mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Mar;109:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
Latimer NR, Bell H, Abrams KR, Amonkar MM, Casey M. Adjusting for treatment switching in the METRIC study shows further improved overall survival with trametinib compared with chemotherapy. Cancer Med. 2016 May;5(5):806-15. doi: 10.1002/cam4.643. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
Santiago-Walker A, Gagnon R, Mazumdar J, Casey M, Long GV, Schadendorf D, Flaherty K, Kefford R, Hauschild A, Hwu P, Haney P, O'Hagan A, Carver J, Goodman V, Legos J, Martin AM. Correlation of BRAF Mutation Status in Circulating-Free DNA and Tumor and Association with Clinical Outcome across Four BRAFi and MEKi Clinical Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 1;22(3):567-74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0321. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
Schadendorf D, Amonkar MM, Milhem M, Grotzinger K, Demidov LV, Rutkowski P, Garbe C, Dummer R, Hassel JC, Wolter P, Mohr P, Trefzer U, Lefeuvre-Plesse C, Rutten A, Steven N, Ullenhag G, Sherman L, Wu FS, Patel K, Casey M, Robert C. Functional and symptom impact of trametinib versus chemotherapy in BRAF V600E advanced or metastatic melanoma: quality-of-life analyses of the METRIC study. Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):700-706. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt580. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
114267
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.