Regenafil Versus Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) for Periodontal Defects

NCT ID: NCT00255970

Last Updated: 2011-08-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study was to determine whether treatment with the bone grafting material Regenafil was as effective as the standard treatment using demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA). Regenafil is demineralized freeze dried bone in a special gel form.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To compare the regenerative effects of a demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) particulate in a biologic thermoplastic carrier (Regenafil) to the standard of care. To compare the regenerative effects of a demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) particulate in the treatment of intraosseous vertical defects following six months of healing. This was accomplished by evaluating clinical parameters including probing depth, attachment level and bleeding upon probing, using attachment level as the primary outcome variable.

Treatment of the vertical osseous defect is a challenging problem in periodontics. There are many treatment options including:

1. open flap debridement;
2. osseous graft alone;
3. membrane alone;
4. or membrane plus an osseous graft.

Choice of treatment may depend on the defect depth and configuration. A shallow, narrow 3 wall defect may respond well to open flap debridement while a deep 2 wall defect may need regenerative therapy such as an osseous graft, a membrane or combined membrane and graft treatment. Studies of vertical defect therapy with defects about 4 mm or greater show that similar percent defect fill results are obtained with regenerative therapies. Open flap debridement produces substantially less percent defect fill.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periodontal Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Regenafil graft

Regenafil

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regenafil

Intervention Type DEVICE

Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone in a porcine gel carrier

DFDBA

Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DFDBA

Intervention Type OTHER

Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft bone

Regenafil

Intervention Type DEVICE

Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone in a porcine gel carrier

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DFDBA

Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft bone

Intervention Type OTHER

Regenafil

Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone in a porcine gel carrier

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Demineralized Bone Matrix Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Provide written informed consent prior to their participation.
2. Be an adult age 18 and older.
3. Have at least a 4 mm open vertical osseous defect depth on one tooth, visible on a radiograph and with a probing depth ≥ 5 mm.
4. Have osseous defects that are either wide 3-wall, or combination defects.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Have debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that affect the periodontium.
2. Have a known allergy to any of the materials that will be used in the study:

* non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
* chlorhexidine digluconate
* doxycycline
* gelatin
3. Need prophylactic antibiotics.
4. Have a vertical osseous defect that is related to a furcation area.
5. Smoke more than 1 pack per day.
6. Have endodontically treated teeth or endodontic lesions at study sites.
7. Have 1-wall defects.
8. Have poor oral hygiene.
9. Have anterior fillings (Note: if a subject presents with anterior fillings, it will be at the discretion of the principal investigator as to whether they should be accepted into the study.)
10. Be pregnant as evidenced by a positive urine pregnancy test taken at both the screening and baseline visits.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

RTI Surgical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Regeneration Technologies, Inc

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Henry Greenwell, DMD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Louisville

Steven Blanchard, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University School of Dentistry

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville School of Dentistry

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RegenF052005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rh-PDGF vs EMD for Treatment of Intra-bony Defects
NCT05442034 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2