Botulinum Toxin Injection in Neck Muscles in Cervicogenic Headache

NCT ID: NCT00184197

Last Updated: 2017-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-31

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect and side-effects of injections with botulinum toxin in neck muscles in cervicogenic headache compared to injections with sodium water.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cervicogenic headache is a unilateral headache stemming from the neck. Usually, there are no pathological findings on x-ray or MRI of the neck. It is supposed that pain may stem from various structures in the upper part of the cervical spine. Regardless of the source, it is often believed that the neck muscles may be involved in the pain generation, either primarily or secondarily.

Treatment of cervicogenic headache is often difficult. The effect of drugs is usually limited. Various surgical techniques such as radiofrequency generation of the facet joints in the neck have been tried, but with little success (4).

Botulinum toxin injection in muscles have for several years been used in conditions with pathologically increased muscle activity, such as spasticity and dystonias. Gradually, it has also been used in many pain conditions, among them headaches. One case history (5) and a randomized placebo controlled, double-blind study (6), have shown effect in cervicogenic headache. The latter study had some methodological weaknesses, since it was small, only 26 patients, and the placebo group had prior to treatment only half as much pain as the group receiving botulinum toxin treatment. In addition, pain was not registered daily, but only before (prior) treatment and after 3 or 4 weeks. A review considers the documentation on treatment with botulinum toxin in idiopathic and cervicogenic headaches to be inconclusive (7).

In our Department, we have tried this treatment on a few patients with typical cervicogenic headache with excellent effect and without side-effects. Therefore, it would be of considerable interest to perform a larger study with good scientific quality and a higher statistical power than the above-mentioned one.

As the basis for our study we would adopt a conservative hypothesis (H0): Botox injections in cervical muscles is not superior to placebo in alleviating pain in unilateral cervicogenic headache.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervicogenic Headache

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Botox

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Botulinum toxin

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebos

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Botulinum toxin

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebos

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Headache strictly unilateral without side-shift
* Traits indicating involvement of neck structures, fulfilling at least 2 of the following:

I. Reduced neck range of motion II. Typical headache can be elicited by palpation or pressure on muscles of the occiput or in the neck.

III. Typical headache can be precipitated by certain neck movements or by adopting a certain position of the head.

IV. There is a radiation of pain to the ipsilateral shoulder or arm.

* Positive effect of blockades. (In this study only a blockade of the greater occipital nerve will be applied).
* The condition has lasted for more than 1 year.
* The headache should be present more than 15 days a month, and the frequency should be based on a headache diary filled in the last month before inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cervical spinal stenosis, cervical disc herniation, or other neck pathology that should be treated surgically.
* Malignant disorder.
* Rheumatic disorder or other disorders which induces analgesic use.
* other clinically relevant disease (liver, kidney, endocrinological, metabolical, systemic, psychiatric).
* Frequent other headache type that cannot be distinguished from cervicogenic headache.
* Pending or ongoing litigation for head- or neck trauma.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lars Jacob Stovner, professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Norwegian Headache Centre

Trondheim, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Linde M, Hagen K, Salvesen O, Gravdahl GB, Helde G, Stovner LJ. Onabotulinum toxin A treatment of cervicogenic headache: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Cephalalgia. 2011 May;31(7):797-807. doi: 10.1177/0333102411398402. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21300635 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2004-000724-32

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.