ACVBP Versus ACVBP Plus Rituximab in Low Risk Localized Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT00140660

Last Updated: 2017-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

223 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a multicentric randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of the combination R-ACVBP in patients 18 to 65 years with low risk localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately 30 to 40% of diffuse large B cell lymphomas are localized at diagnosis (stage I-II). Until the seventies, radiotherapy was used as the single modality to treat these localized stages but no more than half of the patients were cured. From the eighties, anthracycline-based regimens combined or not with radiotherapy gave superior results in term of relapse free survival compared with radiotherapy alone. Later on Miller et al. published a randomized study showing that 3 cycles of CHOP combined with radiotherapy gave superior results in term of overall survival as compared with 8 cycles of CHOP. This study was recently updated with a follow up of more than 8 years and shows no more difference between the two arms, due to an excess of late mortality after the combined treatment.

Recently, two trials were conducted by the GELA to compare chemotherapy alone to a combined chemo-radiotherapy approach in patients with low risk localized diffuse large cell lymphoma (age-adjusted IPI = 0).

* The objective of the LNH 93-1 study was to compare, in patients aged from 18 to 60 years 3 cycles of CHOP followed by radiotherapy with chemotherapy alone consisting in 3 cycles of ACVBP. The ACVBP regimen includes a more intensive induction followed by a sequential consolidation. With a median follow up of 55 months, the results have shown a superiority of the ACVBP arm for both the 5 year event free (83% vs. 74%, p = 0.004) and overall survival (89% vs. 80%, p = 0.02).
* The LNH 93-4 study compared in patients \>60 years the association of 4 cycles of CHOP + radiotherapy to the same regimen without irradiation. This study fails to demonstrate any benefit of the combined chemo-radiotherapy in term of survival, but indicates that chemotherapy alone is probably less toxic in patients older than 69 years.

Considering these two trials, we concluded that radiotherapy given after chemotherapy did not give any benefit to elderly patients treated for a low risk localized diffuse large cell lymphoma, and that ACVBP regimen was superior to 3 CHOP + radiotherapy in patients \<60 years, and has to be considered as the treatment of reference in these patients.

Two other GELA trials contributed recently to improve the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma and have to be considered for the elaboration of future studies:

* The objective of the LNH 98-5 study was to compare the association of CHOP + rituximab (R-CHOP) to the CHOP regimen alone in elderly patients with previously untreated large B-cell lymphoma. The analysis showed a significant superiority of the association CHOP + rituximab.
* The LNH 93-5 study compared the ACVBP regimen to the CHOP in patients aged from 61 to 69 years with aggressive lymphoma and at least one adverse prognostic factor according to the International Prognostic Index. Out of 703 patients included in this study, the results have shown the same complete response rate in the two arms, but a significantly better 3-year event free survival and overall survival in the ACVBP arm than in the CHOP arm. However, the benefit seems to be greater in patients \<66 years, due to higher toxicity with the ACVBP regimen in elderly patients.

All the above-mentioned results led us to propose a randomized trial comparing ACVBP to ACVBP + rituximab (R-ACVBP) in previously untreated patients with low risk localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (age-adjusted IPI = 0), and to extend the upper age limit from 60 to 65 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

R-ACVBP

addition of rituximab to standard ACVBP chemotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

375 mg/m2 on D1

ACVBP

standard ACVBP chemotherapy

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rituximab

375 mg/m2 on D1

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with histologically proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (WHO classification).
* Age from 18 to 65 years.
* Patient not previously treated.
* Ann Arbor stage I or II.
* ECOG performance status \< 2.
* Normal LDH.
* Negative HIV, HBV and HCV serologies 4 weeks (except after vaccination).
* Having previously signed a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any other histological type of lymphoma. vAny history of treated or non-treated indolent lymphoma. However, patients not previously diagnosed and having a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with some small cell infiltration in lymph node may be included.
* Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma.
* Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens.
* Poor renal function (creatinin level \>150 mmol/l), poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level \>30 mmol/l, transaminases \>2.5 maximum normal level).
* Poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils \< 1.5 G/l or platelets \< 100 G/l.
* Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma.
* Any serious active disease (according to the investigator's decision).
* Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study.
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Adult patient under tutelage.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lymphoma Study Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolas Ketterer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lymphoma Study Association

Felix Reyes, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lymphoma Study Association

Hervé Tilly, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Lymphoma Study Association

Corinne Haioun, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Lymphoma Study Association

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'adulte

Mont-Godinne, , Belgium

Site Status

Hôpital Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Hématologie CHU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Louis

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hématologie Adultes - Hôpital Necker

Paris, , France

Site Status

Service d'Hématologie - Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Robert Debré

Reims, , France

Site Status

Centre Henri Becquerel

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Hématologie CHU Purpan

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Centre Pluridisciplinaire d'Oncologie, CHUV

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Reyes F, Lepage E, Ganem G, Molina TJ, Brice P, Coiffier B, Morel P, Ferme C, Bosly A, Lederlin P, Laurent G, Tilly H; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). ACVBP versus CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1197-205. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042040.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15788496 (View on PubMed)

Miller TP, Dahlberg S, Cassady JR, Adelstein DJ, Spier CM, Grogan TM, LeBlanc M, Carlin S, Chase E, Fisher RI. Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 2;339(1):21-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807023390104.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9647875 (View on PubMed)

Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C, Solal-Celigny P, Bouabdallah R, Ferme C, Christian B, Lepage E, Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Gaulard P, Salles G, Bosly A, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F, Coiffier B. Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4117-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.131. Epub 2005 May 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15867204 (View on PubMed)

Tilly H, Lepage E, Coiffier B, Blanc M, Herbrecht R, Bosly A, Attal M, Fillet G, Guettier C, Molina TJ, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4284-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542. Epub 2003 Aug 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12920037 (View on PubMed)

Copie-Bergman C, Cuilliere-Dartigues P, Baia M, Briere J, Delarue R, Canioni D, Salles G, Parrens M, Belhadj K, Fabiani B, Recher C, Petrella T, Ketterer N, Peyrade F, Haioun C, Nagel I, Siebert R, Jardin F, Leroy K, Jais JP, Tilly H, Molina TJ, Gaulard P. MYC-IG rearrangements are negative predictors of survival in DLBCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy: a GELA/LYSA study. Blood. 2015 Nov 26;126(22):2466-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647602. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26373676 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.gela.org

Official site of the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (In french)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LNH03-1B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.