ACVBP Versus ACVBP Plus Rituximab in Low Risk Localized Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
NCT ID: NCT00140660
Last Updated: 2017-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
223 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-12-31
2012-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ACVBP Plus Rituximab in Patients Aged From 18 to 59 Years With High-risk Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
NCT00144807
ACVBP Plus Rituximab Versus CHOP Plus Rituximab in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Age-adjusted IPI of 1
NCT00140595
R-ACVBP Versus R-CHOP in Patients Aged 60-65 With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
NCT00135499
A Study of Two Associations of Rituximab and Chemotherapy, With a PET-driven Strategy, in Lymphoma
NCT00498043
ACVBP Followed by ASCT in Patients With BCL-2 Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
NCT00169130
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recently, two trials were conducted by the GELA to compare chemotherapy alone to a combined chemo-radiotherapy approach in patients with low risk localized diffuse large cell lymphoma (age-adjusted IPI = 0).
* The objective of the LNH 93-1 study was to compare, in patients aged from 18 to 60 years 3 cycles of CHOP followed by radiotherapy with chemotherapy alone consisting in 3 cycles of ACVBP. The ACVBP regimen includes a more intensive induction followed by a sequential consolidation. With a median follow up of 55 months, the results have shown a superiority of the ACVBP arm for both the 5 year event free (83% vs. 74%, p = 0.004) and overall survival (89% vs. 80%, p = 0.02).
* The LNH 93-4 study compared in patients \>60 years the association of 4 cycles of CHOP + radiotherapy to the same regimen without irradiation. This study fails to demonstrate any benefit of the combined chemo-radiotherapy in term of survival, but indicates that chemotherapy alone is probably less toxic in patients older than 69 years.
Considering these two trials, we concluded that radiotherapy given after chemotherapy did not give any benefit to elderly patients treated for a low risk localized diffuse large cell lymphoma, and that ACVBP regimen was superior to 3 CHOP + radiotherapy in patients \<60 years, and has to be considered as the treatment of reference in these patients.
Two other GELA trials contributed recently to improve the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma and have to be considered for the elaboration of future studies:
* The objective of the LNH 98-5 study was to compare the association of CHOP + rituximab (R-CHOP) to the CHOP regimen alone in elderly patients with previously untreated large B-cell lymphoma. The analysis showed a significant superiority of the association CHOP + rituximab.
* The LNH 93-5 study compared the ACVBP regimen to the CHOP in patients aged from 61 to 69 years with aggressive lymphoma and at least one adverse prognostic factor according to the International Prognostic Index. Out of 703 patients included in this study, the results have shown the same complete response rate in the two arms, but a significantly better 3-year event free survival and overall survival in the ACVBP arm than in the CHOP arm. However, the benefit seems to be greater in patients \<66 years, due to higher toxicity with the ACVBP regimen in elderly patients.
All the above-mentioned results led us to propose a randomized trial comparing ACVBP to ACVBP + rituximab (R-ACVBP) in previously untreated patients with low risk localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (age-adjusted IPI = 0), and to extend the upper age limit from 60 to 65 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
R-ACVBP
addition of rituximab to standard ACVBP chemotherapy
rituximab
375 mg/m2 on D1
ACVBP
standard ACVBP chemotherapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rituximab
375 mg/m2 on D1
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age from 18 to 65 years.
* Patient not previously treated.
* Ann Arbor stage I or II.
* ECOG performance status \< 2.
* Normal LDH.
* Negative HIV, HBV and HCV serologies 4 weeks (except after vaccination).
* Having previously signed a written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma.
* Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens.
* Poor renal function (creatinin level \>150 mmol/l), poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level \>30 mmol/l, transaminases \>2.5 maximum normal level).
* Poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils \< 1.5 G/l or platelets \< 100 G/l.
* Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma.
* Any serious active disease (according to the investigator's decision).
* Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study.
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Adult patient under tutelage.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amgen
INDUSTRY
Lymphoma Study Association
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicolas Ketterer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lymphoma Study Association
Felix Reyes, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Lymphoma Study Association
Hervé Tilly, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Lymphoma Study Association
Corinne Haioun, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Lymphoma Study Association
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'adulte
Mont-Godinne, , Belgium
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, , France
Hématologie CHU de Lille
Lille, , France
Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris, , France
Hématologie Adultes - Hôpital Necker
Paris, , France
Service d'Hématologie - Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Centre Hospitalier Robert Debré
Reims, , France
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, , France
Hématologie CHU Purpan
Toulouse, , France
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, , France
Centre Pluridisciplinaire d'Oncologie, CHUV
Lausanne, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Reyes F, Lepage E, Ganem G, Molina TJ, Brice P, Coiffier B, Morel P, Ferme C, Bosly A, Lederlin P, Laurent G, Tilly H; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). ACVBP versus CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1197-205. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042040.
Miller TP, Dahlberg S, Cassady JR, Adelstein DJ, Spier CM, Grogan TM, LeBlanc M, Carlin S, Chase E, Fisher RI. Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 2;339(1):21-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807023390104.
Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C, Solal-Celigny P, Bouabdallah R, Ferme C, Christian B, Lepage E, Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Gaulard P, Salles G, Bosly A, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F, Coiffier B. Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4117-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.131. Epub 2005 May 2.
Tilly H, Lepage E, Coiffier B, Blanc M, Herbrecht R, Bosly A, Attal M, Fillet G, Guettier C, Molina TJ, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4284-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
Copie-Bergman C, Cuilliere-Dartigues P, Baia M, Briere J, Delarue R, Canioni D, Salles G, Parrens M, Belhadj K, Fabiani B, Recher C, Petrella T, Ketterer N, Peyrade F, Haioun C, Nagel I, Siebert R, Jardin F, Leroy K, Jais JP, Tilly H, Molina TJ, Gaulard P. MYC-IG rearrangements are negative predictors of survival in DLBCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy: a GELA/LYSA study. Blood. 2015 Nov 26;126(22):2466-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647602. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Official site of the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (In french)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LNH03-1B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.