Assessment of the Contribution of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) to a Grass Pollen Allergy Vaccine
NCT ID: NCT00133146
Last Updated: 2021-07-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-12
2005-11-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The tolerability and immunogenicity of GrassMATA (allergen modified with glutaraldehyde and adsorbed to tyrosine) with and without MPL adjuvant (monophosphoryl lipid A, extracted from a bacterial cell surface) was investigated in this double-blind, randomized Phase IIa study in volunteers allergic to grass and rye pollen.
Additionally, this study assessed residual allergenicity of the modified grass and rye pollen in the product GrassMATAMPL using skin prick testing in volunteers allergic to grass and rye pollen.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Grass Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in Patients Sensitized to Grass Pollen
NCT00133159
Assessment of the Contribution of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) to a Tree Pollen Allergy Vaccine
NCT00118625
A Study of Tolerability and Safety of Two New Doses of Grass MATA MPL
NCT02557633
Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of Tyrosine Adsorbed Ragweed Pollen Allergoid With MPL (Monophosphoryl Lipid A)
NCT00109759
Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Grass MATA MPL
NCT00414141
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Enrollment was planned for 40 patients, 20 in each active treatment group. Data from 41 patients who completed the single blind portion of the study and from 40 randomized patients who took part in the double blind portion of the study were analyzed and included in the study. Screening was performed at Visit 0, then subjects fulfilling all inclusion/exclusion criteria underwent a series of skin prick tests to evaluate the tolerability of native allergen, modified allergen and tyrosine adsorbates with and without MPL® (Visit 1, single-blind portion of the study).
At Visit 2, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either Grass MATA MPL or Grass MATA and received the first injection of treatment. The dosing regimen consisted of three 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of increasing strengths and was the same for both treatment groups. Patients were asked to remain in the clinic for an observation period of 30 to 45 minutes following study drug administration in order to record adverse reactions associated. The second and third injections of treatment were administered at Visit 4 and Visit 6. Each dosing visit occurred at least 14 days after the previous one.
Safety follow-up were performed 7-8 days after each dosing, at Visit 3, 5 and 7.
Subjects terminated the study after completion of Visit 8 (Post-treatment visit).
To assess the immunological response to Grass MATA MPL versus Grass MATA blood test were performed at baseline (Visit 0), after the first administration (Visit 3) and at the end of the study (Visit 8). Safety and tolerability of the different allergens used during prick test and of Grass MATA MPL versus Grass MATA were also be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Grass MATA MPL
300 SU/0.5 mL Grass MATA MPL (Visit 2);
800 SU/0.5 mL Grass MATA MPL (Visit 4);
2000 SU/0.5 mL Grass MATA MPL (Visit 6)
Grass MATA MPL
Grass MATA
300 SU/0.5 mL Grass MATA (Visit 2);
800 SU/0.5 mL Grass MATA (Visit 4);
2000 SU/0.5 mL Grass MATA (Visit 6);
Grass MATA MPL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Grass MATA MPL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients had a positive skin prick test to positive histamine control with a wheal (longest) diameter \>= 3 mm.
* Patients had a negative skin prick test to negative control; redness, but no wheal was acceptable.
* Specific IgE for grass and rye as documented by radioallergosorbent (RAST) or equivalent test with class \>= 2
* History of at least 1 season of moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis due to an IgE-mediated allergy to pollen from grass and rye
* Patients scored moderate or severe in the disease severity questionnaire
* Males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females who are post-menopausal or naturally or surgically sterile (hysterectomy; bilateral oophorectomy; bilateral tubal ligation with surgery at least 6 weeks prior to study initiation). Postmenopausal was defined as at least 12 months natural spontaneous amenorrhea, or at least 6 weeks following surgical menopause (bilateral oophorectomy). Females of childbearing potential were required to have a confirmed absence of pregnancy according to a negative urine pregnancy test and were required to be using one of the following acceptable birth control methods:
1. Intrauterine device (IUD) in place for at least 90 days
2. Barrier method (condom or diaphragm) with spermicide
3. Stable hormonal contraceptive for at least 90 days prior to study and through study completion
4. Abstinence
5. Non-heterosexual lifestyle
6. Vasectomised partner for at least 90 days.
* Patients were normally active and otherwise judged to be in good health on the basis of medical history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests.
* Patients were willing and able to attend required study visits.
* Patients were able to follow instructions.
* Patients were willing and able to give written informed consent and provided this consent. Consent was required prior to the initiation of any washout period.
* Spirometry at Screening demonstrates FEV1\>= 80% predicted and FEV1/FVC\>= 70%.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient has moderate to severe asthma. Patients with mild asthma requiring use of bronchodilators as needed were allowed as long as they did not have significant worsening with seasonal exposure to grass pollen
* Visual inspection of the forearms indicates potential problems with the conduct or interpretation of the skin prick test; both forearms must be available for testing
* History or presence of diabetes (insulin dependent and non-dependent), cancer or any clinically significant cardiac, metabolic renal, hematologic diseases or disorders
* Recent clinically significant history (within 2 years) of hepatic gastrointestinal, dermatologic, venereal, neurologic or psychiatric diseases or disorders
* Any clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) abnormal laboratory value at Visit 0
* Clinically relevant sensitivity to any of the following perennial allergens: house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae), molds (Cladosporium cladosporoides, Alternaria alternata, Penicillium chrysogenum, Aspergillus fumigatus) and epithelia (cat \[Felis domesticus\], dog \[Canis familiaris\])
* Patient had clinically relevant sensitivity determined by a positive case history, skin prick test wheal size \>= 3 mm in diameter greater than the negative control, or RAST test with class \>= 2 against the following summer/autumn season flowering plants: Plantago lanceolata (plantain), Atriplex sp. (orache), Urtica dioica (nettle), Artemisia vulgaris (mugwort), Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass), or Ambrosia elatior (ragweed).
* Secondary alteration at the affected organ (i.e. emphysema, bronchiectasis)
* History of autoimmune diseases and/or rheumatoid diseases
* Patients who are taking b-blockers for any indication
* Patients who are not allowed to receive adrenalin
* Disorder of tyrosine metabolism (especially in the case of alcaptonuria, tyrosinemia).
* Presence of a disease with a pathogenesis interfering with the immune response and had received medication which could influence the results of this study
* Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic infection
* History of anaphylaxis, including anaphylactic food allergy, insect venom anaphylaxis, or exercise- or drug-induced anaphylaxis.
* Documented history of angioedema
* Hypersensitivity to the excipients in the study medication
* Previous or current hyposensitization therapy with comparable grass allergen extracts
* Currently using anti-allergy medication and other drugs with antihistaminic activity
* Currently participating in a clinical trial or has been exposed to study drug within the last 30 days
* Could not communicate reliably with the Investigator or was not likely to cooperate with the requirements of the study
* Patient is pregnant or planning pregnancy and/or lactating
* Patient has received treatment with preparation containing monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) during the past 12 months.
* Concurrent use of any prohibited medication or inadequate washout of any medication
* Any systemic disorder that could have interfered with the evaluation of the study drug.
* Clinical history (within 2 years) of drug or alcohol abuse, at the Investigator's discretion, that would interfere with the patient's participation in the study.
* Study site staff or immediate relatives of study site staff or other individuals who would have access to the clinical study protocol
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Allergy Therapeutics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karl Jürgen Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Allergy Therapeutics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Allied Research International Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P2DP05004
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GrassMATAMPL202
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.