A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Group Versus Individual Anger Management in Subjects With IED

NCT ID: NCT00127400

Last Updated: 2013-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-02-28

Study Completion Date

2006-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see how different forms of "Anger Management" compare in reducing anger and impulsive aggressive symptoms in people. "Anger Management" is a common form of "talk therapy" used to help people with anger problems. There are different types of "talk therapy" used to help people for anger problems and this study will compare two types of talk therapy in people with Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED). IED is a disorder in which there are frequent and sudden outbursts of anger (yelling, throwing and breaking things, hitting people) that lead to problems with other people socially or at work.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED) is increasingly acknowledged as a common, potentially disabling psychiatric condition. Despite this, there are currently no empirically supported behavioral treatments for patients with IED. The purpose of the proposed study is to assess the short-term and long-term efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT), previously found to be successful in treating dysfunctional anger, for treating IED. Secondary goals of the project are to:

1. explore mechanisms involved in the successful treatment of IED, and
2. examine individual differences associated with treatment response.

Seventy-two subjects meeting for both research and DSM IED criteria will be randomly assigned to either 12 weeks of individual CBT, 12 weeks of group CBT or 12 weeks of a wait-list control condition. Subjects will be assessed before and after therapy/wait-list as well as at 3 month and 6 month follow-up. Primary outcome measures will assess aggressive behavior, anger, and the presence of an IED diagnosis at post-treatment, 6-month follow-up and 12-month follow-up. Social and emotional information processing will be evaluated as potential mechanism of change. Trait aggression will be assessed as a potential moderating variable.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anger Intermittent Explosive Disorder

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

anger intermittent explosive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

anger management therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The subject meets research criteria for a lifetime diagnosis of intermittent explosive disorder (IED).
* The subject has a Trait Anger Score \> 21 on the STAXI (see above).
* Subject is willing to be randomized to any one of the four conditions.
* The subject is willing and able to cooperate with study protocol (i.e., keep appointments, complete rating forms, etc.)
* Subject gives informed consent to participate in study.

Exclusion Criteria

* The subject has any history of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) Axis I bipolar mood disorder, schizophrenia, delusional disorder, organic brain disorder, mental retardation.
* The subject meets DSM-IV criteria for alcohol or drug dependence within 30 days prior to the start of any of the study conditions.
* The subject has a Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition (BDI-II) score \> 32.
* The subject has aggressive obsessions in the context of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD).
* Current suicidal behavior or homicidal ideation.
* The subject is not willing to be randomized to any one of the four conditions.
* The subject is not willing to cooperate with study protocol (i.e., keep appointments, complete rating forms, etc.).
* The subject, in the opinion of the principal investigator (PI), is not able or likely to cooperate with study protocol (i.e., keep appointments, complete rating forms, etc.)
* The subject is already engaged in an anger management program elsewhere.
* The subject does not give informed consent to participate in study
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael McCloskey, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Deffenbacher JL, Filetti LB, Lynch RS, Dahlen ER, Oetting ER. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of high anger drivers. Behav Res Ther. 2002 Aug;40(8):895-910. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00067-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12186353 (View on PubMed)

Deffenbacher, J. L., & McKay, M. (2000). Overcoming Situational and General Anger: A protocol for the treatment of anger based on relaxation, cognitive restructuring, and coping skills training. New Harbinger Publication: Oakland

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Deffenbacher, J. L., McNamara, K., Stark, R. S., & Sabadell, P. M. (1990a). A comparison of cognitive-behavioral and process-oriented group counseling for general anger reduction. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 167-69.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Deffenbacher, J. L., McNamara, K., Stark, R. S., & Sabadell, P. M. (1990b). A combination of cognitive, relaxation, and behavioral coping skills in the reduction of general anger. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 351-358.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., Huff, M. E., Cornell, G. R., & Dallager, C. J. (1996a). Evaluation of two cognitive-behavioral approaches to general anger reduction. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 551-573.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., Huff, M. E., & Thwaites, G. A. (1995). Fifteen-month follow-up of social skills and cognitive-relaxation approaches to general anger reduction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 400-405.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Deffenbacher JL, Oetting ER, Lynch RS, Morris CD. The expression of anger and its consequences. Behav Res Ther. 1996 Jul;34(7):575-90. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00018-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8826765 (View on PubMed)

Deffenbacher, J. L., & Stark, R. S. (1992). Relaxation and cognitive-relaxation treatments of general anger. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 158-167.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

DiGiuseppe, R. & Tafrate, R. C. (2003). Anger Treatment for Adults: A Meta-Analytic Review. Clinical Psychology Science & Practice, 10, 70-84.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11487A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id