New Tablet Containing Two FDA Approved Anti-HIV Drugs For Antiretroviral Therapy Experienced HIV-1 Infected Subjects

NCT ID: NCT00044577

Last Updated: 2020-03-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

166 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-07-16

Study Completion Date

2004-05-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A 48-week study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a new compact formulation of two already FDA-approved anti-HIV drugs in subjects who have already been receiving treatment for their HIV infection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A phase III, randomized, open-label, parallel, multicenter study to evaluate treatment with fixed-dose combination of abacavir/lamivudine (600mg/300mg) once-daily versus abacavir (300mg) twice-daily and lamivudine (300mg) once-daily in combination with tenofovir once-daily and a new PI or NNRTI for 48 weeks in ART-experienced HIV-1 infected patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus I HIV Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

abacavir/lamivudine

Intervention Type DRUG

abacavir

Intervention Type DRUG

lamivudine

Intervention Type DRUG

tenofovir

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

lamivudine abacavir/lamivudine abacavir

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced and currently receiving a stable regimen containing 3 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), or 2 NRTIs plus a protease inhibitor (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) for at least 3 months (there should be no significant ART modifications for at least 3 months and no ART change anticipated between Screening and initiation of the study therapy).
* Patients must be naive to tenofovir.
* HIV-1 RNA level \> 1000 copies/ml on at least one occasion within 21 days of study entry.
* A CD4 cell count \> 50 cells/mm3.
* Specified viral genotypes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
* Has an active diagnosis of AIDS.
* Additional qualifying criteria to be determined by the physician.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ViiV Healthcare

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GSK Clinical Trials, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

GlaxoSmithKline

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GSK Investigational Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hampton, Virginia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Garches, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Levallois-Perret, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lyon, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Brescia, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Turin, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Verona, Veneto, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Cascais, , Portugal

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Faro, , Portugal

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Elche (Alicante), , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Marbella, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Manchester, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Thornton Heath, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Canada France Germany Italy Portugal Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A ONCE DAILY FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION OF ABACAVIR/LAMIVUDINE (ABC/3TC) [FDC ] VERSUS ABC TWICE DAILY AND 3TC ONCE DAILY AS SEPARATE ENTITIES [SE] IN ART-EXPERIENCED HIV-1 INFECTED SUBJECTS (CAL30001): 48 WEEK DATA. Clumeck, N., LaMarca, A., Fu, K., Gordon, D., Craig, C., Zhao, H. , Paes, D., and Scott, T. (WePe6.3C13), 3rd International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, Rio de Janeiro; Brazil, 7/24/2005

Reference Type RESULT

C Craig, C Stone, T Bonny, K Fu. Similar virology findings in ABC/3TC fixed dose combination (FDC) OAD compared with standard dosing in experienced subjects (CAL30001, ALTO). 7th ICDTHI, Glasgow, UK, 14-18 November 2004. Abstract 98

Reference Type RESULT

Clumeck N, Lamarca A, Fu K, Gordon D, Craig C, Zhao H, Paes D, Scott T. Safety and efficacy of a once daily (OAD) Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) of ABC/3TC [FDC arm] versus ABC twice daily (BID) and 3TC OAD as separate entities [SE arm] in ART-Experienced HIV-1 Infected Patients. 44th ICAAC, Washington, DC, 30 October-2 November 2004. Abstr. H-558

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAL30001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Drug Interaction Study
NCT00646776 COMPLETED PHASE1