A Study to See If Taking One or Two Extra Drugs Can Lower HIV Levels in Patients Who Have Failed Their Anti-HIV Drug Treatment

NCT ID: NCT00006152

Last Updated: 2021-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Completion Date

2002-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see if adding 1 or 2 drugs to the anti-HIV therapy of patients whose HIV levels increased while taking their anti-HIV drugs can lower viral load (amount of HIV in the blood) and keep it low up to Week 24. (This study has been changed. Previously, only patients whose levels increased on their first round of anti-HIV drugs were being studied.) Anti-HIV drug treatments that contain a combination of 3 or more drugs can lower HIV levels, raise CD4 cell counts, and improve survival. Unfortunately, many patients "fail" their anti-HIV drug treatment when their HIV levels go above 500 copies/ml. Usually the next step is to switch the patient to different anti-HIV drugs. Doctors would like to see whether adding 1 or 2 different drugs to the "failed" treatment also can lower HIV levels. Adding 1 or 2 drugs might be better than switching all of the drugs since patients who take many different drugs can develop drug-resistant HIV. (This study has been changed. Previously, only patients taking protease inhibitors (PI) whose levels increased on their first round of anti-HIV drugs were being studied.)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Successful therapy following viral rebound has been problematic. Intensification of the existing regimen by adding 1 or 2 drugs generally has been avoided. However, successfully adding new drugs to an existing regimen would be advantageous since it would expose the patient to fewer antiretroviral agents in the overall treatment course. Recent evidence suggests that a significant proportion of patients who experience viral rebound while receiving a protease inhibitor (PI) actually have viral rebound with a PI-sensitive virus. Other studies have shown that treatment decisions based on resistance assays result in better virologic outcomes. This trial examines further the effect of resistance assay-directed intensification of a PI-containing antiretroviral regimen on viral load. \[AS PER AMENDMENT 04/03/01: The antiretroviral regimen need not contain a protease inhibitor.\]

Patients are stratified by baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (5,000 copies/ml or less versus greater than 5,000 copies/ml). Patients undergo phenotypic drug resistance testing prior to study entry. Based on the phenotypic results, patients are \[AS PER AMENDMENT 11/9/00: selectively\] randomized equally to 1 of 3 \[AS PER AMENDMENT 11/9/00: 1 of 2\] intensification strategies while remaining on their current, initial \[AS PER AMENDMENT 11/9/00: (background)\] antiretroviral therapy (ART). \[AS PER AMENDMENT 04/03/01: ART need not be initial.\] A patient is excluded from randomization to an arm if that arm contains a drug to which the patient has phenotypic resistance. Arm A adds abacavir (ABC). Arm B adds amprenavir (APV) \[AS PER AMENDMENT 11/9/00: and ritonavir (RTV)\]. Arm C adds didanosine (ddI) plus hydroxyurea (HU). \[AS PER AMENDMENT 11/9/00: Arm C has been discontinued.\] A patient's HIV must be sensitive to at least 3 drugs. \[AS PER AMENDMENT 11/9/00: Each patient must be taking at least 3 drugs to which his/her HIV isolate is sensitive, including ABC or APV and at least 2 other drugs that are part of the current, initial (background) ART. If phenotypic resistance testing at screening indicates resistance to a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) drug in the patient's current, initial (background) ART, then the local investigator may choose to discontinue that drug. However, the patient and local investigator may choose to continue the drug but it will not be considered an active drug per this protocol.\] \[AS PER AMENDMENT 04/03/01: ART need not be initial.\] Patients have regular clinic visits for physical exams and blood tests, including CD4 and CD8 cell counts, plasma HIV-1 RNA assays, and tests for pharmacokinetic variability. In the event of viral rebound of 500 copies/ml or more at Week 12 or later, phenotypic/genotypic drug resistance is assayed. In addition, phenotypic drug resistance is assayed at the primary endpoint (Week 24) and at the end of treatment (Week 48) on all patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Drug Therapy, Combination HIV Protease Inhibitors Ritonavir VX 478 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Anti-HIV Agents Viral Load abacavir

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ritonavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Abacavir sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Amprenavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients may be eligible for this study if they:

* Are HIV-positive.
* Are taking 3 or more anti-HIV drugs for at least 24 weeks. (This study has been changed. Previously, only patients taking their first round of anti-HIV drugs, which included a PI, were being studied.)
* Had a viral load below 500 copies/ml while on their anti-HIV drugs, and then had an increase in viral load to between 500 and 10,000 copies/ml. (This study has been changed. Previously, only patients whose levels increased on their first round of anti-HIV drugs were being studied.)
* Have a CD4 cell count of 100 cells/mm3 or more.
* Are age 13 or older (consent of a parent or legal guardian is required if under 18).
* Agree to use 2 methods of birth control during the study and for 60 days after. (This study has changed the birth control requirements.)

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will not be eligible for this study if they:

* Are currently being treated for a serious infection or other serious medical illness.
* Have had certain illnesses in the past.
* Have a fever within 7 days of study entry.
* Have already taken all of the study drugs for more than 4 weeks.
* Are unable to take any of the study drugs.
* Have certain types of cancer.
* Received certain vaccines within 21 days of study entry.
* Have received certain medications.
* Are pregnant or breast-feeding.
* Patients will not be eligible for Group A if they:
* Have a history of hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir.
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Murphy

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

William Powderly

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mary Albrecht

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Univ of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Univ of Southern California / LA County USC Med Ctr

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Univ of California, San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Univ of Colorado Health Sciences Ctr

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Univ Med School

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The CORE Ctr

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess - West Campus

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

St Louis Regional Hosp / St Louis Regional Med Ctr

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Med Ctr

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Univ of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke Univ Med Ctr

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Julio Arroyo

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Univ of Texas Galveston

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10898

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ACTG A5061

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AACTG A5061

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

A5061

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id