Personalisation of Mean Arterial Pressure in Adult Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

NCT ID: NCT07345559

Last Updated: 2026-01-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

406 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-03-15

Study Completion Date

2029-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by inadequate cardiac output, leading to organ hypoperfusion and high mortality. Maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) is crucial, but standard targets may be insufficient due to venous congestion. Central venous pressure (CVP) can help assess effective perfusion pressure. This study investigates whether a personalized MAP target adjusted by CVP improves organ function and survival compared to standard MAP management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiogenic shock is a severe and life-threatening condition. Its prognosis remains very poor with a high mortality rate (up to 50% in clinical series) despite recent therapeutic advances. Current recommendations suggest the use of inotropes and vasopressors to maintain tissue perfusion and prevent organ failure.

During cardiogenic shock, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) level is associated with survival. A post hoc analysis of a recent randomized trial found increased mortality among patients in cardiogenic shock whose average MAP was \<70 mmHg during the first 36 hours after randomization, compared to patients with MAP ≥70 mmHg (58% vs. 29%, p\<0.01). Another observational study found higher mortality among patients with a mean MAP \<65 mmHg during the first 24 hours of shock compared to those with MAP ≥65 mmHg (57% vs. 28%, p\<0.001). In this study, the incidence of renal failure was also inversely associated with MAP level. The optimal MAP target remains unknown during cardiogenic shock.

Due to the characteristic venous congestion, the effective perfusion pressure may be very low during cardiogenic shock despite MAP being within the usual target (65 mmHg). Furthermore, increased central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with higher mortality during cardiogenic shock. Considering venous congestion by measuring or estimating CVP is necessary to assess the effective perfusion pressure (MAP minus CVP) in order to protect against organ dysfunction. In this perspective, the MAP target should be increased by the value of the CVP.

The investigators hypothesize that personalizing the MAP target (to achieve an effective perfusion pressure of 65 mmHg) improves organ perfusion and survival during cardiogenic shock compared to the usual MAP target of 65 mmHg.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiogenic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Personalized MAP

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized MAP

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients receive blood pressure management targeting a personalized MAP ranging from 65 mmHg + CVP to 75 mmHg + CVP, without exceeding 90 mmHg.CVP is measured via a central venous catheter positioned in the superior vena cava. After 48 hours, if tissue perfusion is restored, the MAP target may be reduced to 65-70 mmHg.

Standard MAP

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard MAP

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients receive blood pressure management aiming for a standard MAP target of 65-70 mmHg, according to international guidelines for cardiogenic shock management.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personalized MAP

Patients receive blood pressure management targeting a personalized MAP ranging from 65 mmHg + CVP to 75 mmHg + CVP, without exceeding 90 mmHg.CVP is measured via a central venous catheter positioned in the superior vena cava. After 48 hours, if tissue perfusion is restored, the MAP target may be reduced to 65-70 mmHg.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard MAP

Patients receive blood pressure management aiming for a standard MAP target of 65-70 mmHg, according to international guidelines for cardiogenic shock management.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged ≥18 years
* Cardiogenic shock state, according to the consensus definition,
* SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) classification ≥ C
* Consent from the patient or close relative / trusted person or emergency inclusion procedure
* Benefiting fromciary of a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria

* Catecholamine infusion for more than 24 consecutive hours;
* CVP \< 5 mm Hg at inclusion;
* MAP \> 70 mmHg at inclusion;
* Chronic kidney disease stage G4 (defined by an eGFR between 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m²) or G5 (defined by an eGFR less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m²) according to the KDIGO CKD classification at inclusion;
* Chronic dialysis or presence of renal replacement therapy criteria at inclusion ;
* Recovered cardiopulmonary arrest within 7 days prior to inclusion;
* Patient already on mechanical circulatory support at inclusion before enrollment (patients who receive support after inclusion will not be excluded);
* Primary diagnosis of tamponade, pulmonary embolism, or septic shock;
* Hypersensitivity to norepinephrine tartrate or to any of the following excipients: sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide water for injectable preparations;
* Absence of central venous access;
* Known pregnancy or current breastfeeding;
* Under legal guardianship, curatorship, or judicial protection.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CMC Ambroise Paré

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU d'Amiens-Picardie

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier

Massy, , France

Site Status

CMC Ambroise Paré - Hartmann

Neuilly-sur-Seine, , France

Site Status

CHU d'Orléans

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Lariboisière

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

Clinique NCT + /Saint-Gatien

Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, , France

Site Status

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Strasbourg

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

CHU de Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Armand MEKONTSO DESSAP, MD

Role: CONTACT

+ 33 1 45 17 85 06

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Christophe BEYLS, MD

Role: primary

Armand MEKONTSO DESSAP, MD

Role: primary

Wulfran BOUGOUIN, MD

Role: primary

Guillaume GERI, MD

Role: primary

Marc GORALSKI, MD

Role: primary

Bruno MÉGARBANE, MD

Role: primary

Alain CARIOU, MD

Role: primary

Aurélien SEEMANN, MD

Role: primary

Tristan MORICHAUBEAUCHANT, MD

Role: primary

Hamid MERDJI, MD

Role: primary

Clément DELMAS, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-A00253-44

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2024/01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Atrial Strain in Septic Shock
NCT06832436 RECRUITING
Pressure Volume Loop
NCT04478188 UNKNOWN