RenewDisc Trial: Endoscopic Discectomy and Autologous Stem Cell Therapy for Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT07338877
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-10-01
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants are treated according to routine clinical decision-making, and no interventions are assigned by the study protocol. Data are collected prospectively at predefined follow-up intervals to assess pain intensity, functional disability, quality of life, and structural changes on magnetic resonance imaging.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Autologous BM-MSC in Worker Patients Affected by Chronic LBP Due to Multilevel IDD
NCT04759105
Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of BM-MSC in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP) Due to Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) Unresponsive
NCT03737461
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of IDCT (Intradiscal Cell Therapy) in Subjects With One Level, Symptomatic Mild to Moderate Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT07254806
Safety and Efficacy Study Comparing ProDisc-C to ACDF Surgery to Treat SCDD
NCT00291018
Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Autologous BM-MSC in Subjects With Chronic LBP Due to Multilevel Lumbar IDD
NCT05066334
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The RenewDisc Trial is designed as a prospective observational cohort study to systematically collect and analyze real-world clinical data from patients with confirmed discogenic low back pain who undergo endoscopic spine procedures as part of routine clinical care. The study does not assign or randomize treatments. All therapeutic decisions, including the choice of procedure, are made independently by the treating physician based on standard clinical indications and patient preference.
Patients included in the study undergo one of the following standard clinical approaches: endoscopic discectomy, endoscopic discectomy combined with autologous mesenchymal stem cell application, or standalone endoscopic application of autologous mesenchymal stem cells. These approaches represent established clinical practices at participating centers. The study observes outcomes associated with each approach without altering standard care pathways.
Clinical outcomes are assessed prospectively using validated patient-reported outcome measures, including pain intensity scales, functional disability, and health-related quality of life. Imaging follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging is performed at predefined intervals to evaluate structural changes of the intervertebral disc. In patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration as part of standard care, cellular characteristics of the aspirate are analyzed descriptively.
Data are collected at baseline and during scheduled follow-up visits and are recorded using anonymized, randomly generated participant identifiers. The study aims to provide comparative real-world evidence on clinical, functional, and imaging outcomes associated with contemporary endoscopic and regenerative spine treatment strategies for discogenic low back pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endoscopic Discectomy Plus Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy
Patients with clinically confirmed discogenic low back pain who undergo transforaminal endoscopic discectomy combined with autologous mesenchymal stem cell application as part of routine clinical care. Treatment selection is based on standard clinical decision-making and is not assigned by the study protocol.
No interventions assigned to this group
Endoscopic Discectomy
Patients with clinically confirmed discogenic low back pain who undergo transforaminal endoscopic discectomy as part of standard clinical practice. The study prospectively observes clinical, functional, and imaging outcomes without assigning treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Endoscopic Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy
Patients with clinically confirmed discogenic low back pain who undergo standalone endoscopic application of autologous mesenchymal stem cells as part of routine clinical care. Outcomes are observed prospectively without protocol-driven treatment allocation.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of discogenic low back pain
* Positive provocative discography of the target intervertebral disc
* Negative medial branch block
* Preserved lumbar intervertebral disc height greater than 50%
* Pfirrmann grade I-II on lumbar spine MRI
* Back pain with or without radicular pain
* Back pain representing at least 30% of the patient's total reported pain
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of Schmorl's nodes in adjacent vertebrae
* Acute or chronic infection
* Presence of hematological disorders
* Back pain representing less than 30% of the patient's total reported pain
* Contraindication to endoscopic spine procedures
* Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Slovak Academy of Sciences
OTHER_GOV
Pavol Jozef Safarik University
OTHER
Europainclinics z.ú.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Poliklinika Terasa
Košice, Košice Region, Slovakia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10148/2024/ODDZ-44592
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.