Development and Pre-validation of a Machine Learning-based Prediction Algorithm for Early Functional Recovery in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07333560
Last Updated: 2026-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
943 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-01-31
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Can a machine learning model accurately classify patients with faster versus slower recovery of autonomous mobility in the first days after joint replacement surgery?
Patients who have undergone elective hip or knee arthroplasty and received post-operative physiotherapy will have their clinical and perioperative data collected retrospectively (2020-2023) and prospectively (March 2026-December 2027). The algorithm will be trained on retrospective data and tested prospectively to evaluate its predictive performance for early mobilization and length of hospital stay.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Locomotor Activity Before and After Total Hip Replacement in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis.
NCT02042586
An Artificial Intelligence-based Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty: From Inflammatory Responses to Personalized Medicine
NCT06634654
Prediction of Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement
NCT01370421
Early Perioperative Quality Of Recovery After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: a Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
NCT06107296
Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT03378986
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data Collection and Outcomes:
Mobility recovery: assessed by the ability to ascend and descend three steps within the first four postoperative days, recorded in the physiotherapy diary and electronic health record.
Length of stay: considered regular if discharged by the fifth postoperative day; longer stays are defined as prolonged.
Predictors: Baseline demographics (age, sex, BMI, ASA score, preoperative hemoglobin) and clinical/perioperative characteristics (type of surgery and anesthesia, initiation of physiotherapy, pain level, urinary catheter use, orthostatic intolerance).
Sample Size: 943 patients total (600 retrospective, 343 prospective), based on model development requirements and AUROC estimation.
Data Analysis: The dataset will be split into training, validation, and test sets. Multiple supervised learning algorithms (e.g., logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting) will be compared. Model performance will be evaluated using AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and calibration. Missing data will be handled with imputation or native algorithm methods when supported.
Model Validation: Prospective data will be used to assess model discrimination and calibration, and to identify potential temporal or clinical biases. Retraining may be performed using combined datasets to improve generalizability.
Study Flow: Retrospective patients identified via hospital records; prospective patients identified on the first postoperative physiotherapy session, provided with study information, and consented. Predictive results are stored in a separate registry inaccessible to treating clinicians.
Participating Centers:
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna - patient enrollment. Complex Structure of Medical Physics, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova - data analysis and AI modeling.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Predictive Model for Early Mobility Recovery and Length of Stay
Application of a machine learning-based predictive algorithm to retrospectively and prospectively analyze clinical and perioperative data in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, without influencing clinical decision-making.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients underwent elective hip or knee arthroplasty.
* Patients for whom postoperative physiotherapy was initiated.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients for whom postoperative physiotherapy was not provided due to postoperative complications
* clinical data are unavailable.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mattia Morri
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Istotuto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Morri
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Istotuto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SAITeR IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ribbons K, Cochrane J, Johnson S, Wills A, Ditton E, Dewar D, Broadhead M, Chan I, Dixon M, Dunkley C, Harbury R, Jovanovic A, Leong A, Summersell P, Todhunter C, Verheul R, Pollack M, Walker R, Nilsson M. Biopsychosocial based machine learning models predict patient improvement after total knee arthroplasty. Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 10;15(1):4926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88560-w.
de Hond AAH, Steyerberg EW, van Calster B. Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Dec;4(12):e853-e855. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00188-1. Epub 2022 Oct 18. No abstract available.
Hamel MB, Toth M, Legedza A, Rosen MP. Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 14;168(13):1430-40. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1430.
Gandhi R, Wasserstein D, Razak F, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. BMI independently predicts younger age at hip and knee replacement. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Dec;18(12):2362-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.72. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
Corbacioglu SK, Aksel G. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value. Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 3;23(4):195-198. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_182_23. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
Baklola M, Reda Elmahdi R, Ali S, Elshenawy M, Mohamed Mossad A, Al-Bawah N, Mohamed Mansour R. Artificial intelligence in disease diagnostics: a comprehensive narrative review of current advances, applications, and future challenges in healthcare. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 May 26;87(7):4237-4245. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003423. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
641/2025/Oss/IOR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.