Norepinephrine vs. Phenylephrine for Hypotension in Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

NCT ID: NCT07327320

Last Updated: 2026-01-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-06

Study Completion Date

2025-10-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of two medications, norepinephrine and phenylephrine, in preventing hypotension during low-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery (CD). Although low-dose spinal anesthesia combined with opioids is widely used to mitigate hypotension, the incidence remains unacceptably high. Thus, vasopressors remain essential in maintaining maternal blood pressure during these procedures.

In this study, 100 women were initially assessed, with 2 excluded. The remaining 98 were randomly assigned to receive a continuous infusion of either norepinephrine or phenylephrine. During the follow-up process, 2 patients from each group were lost, resulting in 47 participants per group for final analysis.

The results showed that norepinephrine was significantly more effective, with a lower incidence of hypotension (14.9% vs. 42.6%). It also provided more stable heart rates with fewer episodes of bradycardia and less need for rescue medications. Both treatments were safe for the babies with comparable Apgar scores.

This study suggests that Norepinephrine infusion at 0.05 mcg/kg/min is more effective than phenylephrine at 0.25 mcg/kg/min in preventing hypotension during low-dose SA in CD, providing better hemodynamic stability and fewer episodes of bradycardia

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Upon arrival in the operating room, the parturient was monitored using standard American Society of Anesthesiologists monitors, including electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and invasive arterial BP measurement. A large peripheral vein was cannulated using an 18-gauge intravenous catheter for the administration of fluids and medications. Baseline BP was determined by averaging three measurements taken 2 minutes apart in the supine position before SA. Low-dose SA was performed with 8 mg of bupivacaine (Marcain) combined with 20 mcg of fentanyl and 100 mcg of morphine (Opiphine). At injection, patients received 15 ml/kg of 0.9% saline IV and group-specific vasopressors:

* P group: Continuous intravenous phenylephrine infusion was administered at 0.25 mcg/kg/min, prepared by diluting 500 mcg in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride.
* N group: Continuous intravenous norepinephrine infusion was administered at 0.05 mcg/kg/min, prepared by diluting 100 mcg in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride.

Following SA, patients were placed in a 15° left lateral tilt and administered 4 mg of ondansetron and 4 mg of dexamethasone intravenously. The sensory block was assessed at 10 minutes; a block at or above the xiphoid was considered effective. After placental delivery, uterotonics were administered as prescribed by the obstetrician. Vasopressor infusion was stopped 5 minutes after delivery.

BP and heart rate (HR) were recorded every 2 minutes during the first 30 minutes after SA, then every 5 minutes until the end of surgery. Neonatal HR was monitored continuously, and Apgar scores were assessed at 1 and 5 minutes by a neonatologist.

Management of Hemodynamic Events and Bradycardia Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg or a drop of more than 20% from baseline. Management involved increasing the vasopressor infusion rate by 20%, followed by administration of phenylephrine 50 mcg intravenously if the HR was ≥ 75 bpm, or ephedrine 6 mg IV if HR was \< 75 bpm. The infusion rate was returned to baseline once SBP recovered to the target range (80-120% of baseline).

Severe hypotension (SBP \< 60% of baseline) was treated using the same approach but with a higher dose of rescue vasopressors: phenylephrine 100 mcg IV or ephedrine 12 mg IV, depending on HR.

In cases of hypertension (SBP \> 120% of baseline), the vasopressor infusion was reduced by 50%. If the SBP exceeded 130%, the infusion was temporarily stopped and reinitiated at 50% of the original dose once the SBP returned to the target range.

Bradycardia was defined as a HR of less than 60 bpm. Management of bradycardia was based on the patient's hemodynamic status. If bradycardia occurred without hypotension, the vasopressor infusion was temporarily discontinued, and if the HR recovered to ≥ 60 bpm, the infusion was resumed at 50% of the original dose. Persistent bradycardia (\>3 minutes) was treated with atropine 0.5 mg IV, up to 3 doses. If bradycardia was associated with hypotension, ephedrine 6 mg IV was administered.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Spinal Cesarean Section Hypotension, Controlled

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This was a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial with a parallel group design and a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The randomization sequence was concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Each envelope contained the specific intervention protocol for the assigned group. The Principal Investigator generated the allocation sequence and prepared the envelopes prior to the study. To ensure concealment, the recruiting investigator opened the next envelope in the sequence only after the participant was enrolled, thereby determining the group assignment.

This was a single-blind study; only the participants were blinded to the group allocation. Due to the nature of vasopressor administration and the need for real-time hemodynamic management, the investigators and the anesthesiology team were aware of the assigned intervention to ensure patient safety and proper medication delivery

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Norepinephrine

Continuous intravenous norepinephrine infusion was administered at 0.05 mcg/kg/min, prepared by diluting 100 mcg in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Norepinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous intravenous norepinephrine infusion was administered at 0.05 mcg/kg/min, prepared by diluting 100 mcg in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride

Phenylephrine

Continuous intravenous phenylephrine infusion was administered at 0.25 mcg/kg/min, prepared by diluting 500 mcg in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Phenylephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous intravenous phenylephrine infusion was administered at 0.25 mcg/kg/min, prepared by diluting 500 mcg in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Norepinephrine

Continuous intravenous norepinephrine infusion was administered at 0.05 mcg/kg/min, prepared by diluting 100 mcg in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Phenylephrine

Continuous intravenous phenylephrine infusion was administered at 0.25 mcg/kg/min, prepared by diluting 500 mcg in 50 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Parturients aged ≥18 years
* Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II
* Term singleton pregnancies
* Scheduled for elective CD under SA

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate.
* Fetal anomalies or suspected fetal compromise
* Preeclampsia or eclampsia
* Conversion to general anesthesia or use of labor analgesia
* Contraindication to SA
* Preexisting cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; chronic hypertension
* Baseline bradycardia
* Current use of cardiovascular or antihypertensive medications
* Body mass index more than 40 kg/m²
* Body weight less than 50 kg or more than 100 kg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tam Anh Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tam Anh TP. Ho Chi Minh General Hospital

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. Afolabi BB, Lesi FEA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012(10). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3. PubMed PMID: CD004350. 2. Vallejo MC, Attaallah AF, Elzamzamy OM, Cifarelli DT, Phelps AL, Hobbs GR, et al. An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial for comparison of continuous phenylephrine versus norepinephrine infusion in prevention of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. International journal of obstetric anesthesia. 2017;29:18-25. Epub 2016/10/11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.08.005. PubMed PMID: 27720613. 3. Klöhr S, Roth R, Hofmann T, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2010;54(8):909-21. Epub 2010/05/12. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02239.x. PubMed PMID: 20455872. 4. Herbosa GAB, Tho NN, Gapay AA, Lorsomradee S, Thang CQ. Consensus on the Southeast Asian management of hypotension using vasopressors and adjunct modalities during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care. 2022;2(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00084-1. 5. Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, Fernando R, McDonnell N, Mercier FJ, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(1):71-92. Epub 2017/11/02. doi: 10.1111/anae.14080. PubMed PMID: 29090733. 6. Allen TK, George RB, White WD, Muir HA, Habib AS. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2010;111(5):1221-9. Epub 2010/05/25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e1db21. PubMed PMID: 20495139. 7. Habib AS. A Review of the Impact of Phenylephrine Administration on Maternal Hemodynamics and Maternal and Neonatal Outc

Reference Type RESULT

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TA2.24.03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cardiac Output Changes in Cesarean Section
NCT02759510 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1