Mid-term Results of Epiphyseal Transfer for Hip Post Septic Epiphyseal Loss
NCT ID: NCT07321418
Last Updated: 2026-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-12-25
2028-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Management of Closed Diaphyseal Displaced Leg Fractures in Children and Adolescents
NCT06503718
RSA Study on the Behaviour of the Growth Plate During and After Temporary Hemi-epiphysiodesis and Epiphysiodesis
NCT04235517
Evaluation of the Change in Length of the Leg in Children After Treatment of Femur Fractures.
NCT00355420
A Trial on the Opportunity and Treatment of Residual Deformity After Reduction in Developmental Dislocation of the Hip
NCT02163603
Does a 6-week Duration of Hip Spica Immobilization Provide Comparable Clinical and Radiological Outcomes to 12 Weeks in Children Undergoing Open Reduction and Pelvic Osteotomy for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)?
NCT07289256
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Earlier reports of proximal fibular epiphyseal transfer described the use of the peroneal vessels as the pedicle, However the results were overall disappointing and the peroneal artery alone was concluded to be insufficient to support the physeal growth plate. A bipedicled transfer, using the peroneal vessels to support the diaphysis and the anterior tibial vessels or the inferior lateral genicular vessels to support the epiphysis was attempted. Although this showed better outcomes, it was technically more demanding and had a higher risk of complications. Taylor reported the use of the anterior tibial vessels as a single pedicle with success after confirming its role in the blood supply of the fibular diaphysis and epiphysis in a cadaveric study. Another study further popularized the use of the anterior tibial pedicle after introducing the "reverse flow" method and describing the harvest technique. A reported drawback for the use of the anterior tibial pedicle was the occasional need to transect branches of the deep peroneal nerve during the harvest due to their complex relation to the vessels.
This variability in the vascular pedicle employed mandated to the need for a detailed anatomical study of the blood supply of the proximal fibula including the head region, and the supplying vessels, in order to give surgeons appropriate information for choosing the ideal vessel for these complex cases and minimize donor site morbidity. To the best of our knowledge, no such study has been conducted or published in the literature. Moreover, no study has described the anatomic relationship of the deep peroneal nerve branches to the tibialis anterior muscle and their relation to the supplying vessels, which represents another obstacle in the face of popularizing this highly beneficial technique.
Absence or loss of the growth plate together with the epiphysis of a long bone presents a very difficult condition to treat. An example of this is the loss of the head and neck of the femur especially as a part of severe sequelae of infantile septic arthritis. Another example is congenital radial longitudinal deficiency with a previously failed centralization procedure. Management strategies of these and similar problematic conditions are limited and unsatisfactory, with major residual functional disability. Vascularized epiphyseal transfer presents a potential solution to such problems.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum 5 years Follow-up records .
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with incomplete data.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mostafa Ahmed Mostafa Abdelbaky
Resident
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Mostafa
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.