Laser Therapy for Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT07262697

Last Updated: 2025-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background and Purpose: Neck pain is widespread and stands as the sixth most common cause of disability globally. While laser therapy has been used for many years to treat non-specific neck pain (NNP), there is still a shortage of research directly comparing different laser modalities. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and high intensity laser therapy (HILT) in managing NNP.

Methods: sixty patients diagnosed with NNP were equally randomized into three groups. HILT group received 10 weeks of HILT, LLLT group received 10 weeks of LLLT and a control group that received a home program. Outcome measures were evaluated at baseline and after the intervention period and included pain intensity, neck disability, active cervical range of motion (ROM), and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Design This study was designed as randomized comparative trial. The study procedures were conducted in the electrotherapy laboratory in the Department of Rehabilitation and Health Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia between March 2023 and April 2024. The study involved recruitment of 75 subjects from the university hospital and local clinics. Initial evaluation was performed by an orthopedist. The study sample included participants diagnosed with chronic non-specific neck pain (NNP) according to clinical and radiological tests. Study subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups high intensity laser therapy (HILT) group, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) group, and a control group. The HILT group subjects underwent 10 weeks of HILT in addition to a home exercise program while the LLLT group subjects underwent 10 weeks of LLLT in addition to a home exercise program. The third group was a control group where group subjects performed only a home exercise program and did not receive laser therapy. The use of analgesics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications was not allowed during the intervention period (17).

The randomization process was conducted using SPSS statistical software, following a 1:1 allocation ratio and stratified by center, with random block sizes of four to ensure balanced distribution. An independent researcher, who was not involved in recruiting participants or delivering the interventions, generated the randomization sequence. Group assignments were recorded on numbered cards and sealed in opaque envelopes by this independent researcher. These envelopes were later opened by the intervention researchers, who administered the respective treatment according to group allocation.

Blinding was maintained throughout the study. All participants were unaware of their assigned group, ensuring subject blinding. Although the therapists delivering the treatments knew which group participants belonged to, they were blinded to the specific laser parameters, as these settings were predetermined by an independent researcher. The therapists' role was limited to implementing standardized treatment protocols without access to detailed device settings. Furthermore, all outcome evaluations were performed by an assessor who was blinded to group allocation, thereby minimizing assessment bias and maintaining the integrity of the study's double-blind design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain Non Specific Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

th
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HILT

The first phase consisted of rapid manual scanning, delivering a total energy of 1000 J/cm². During the second phase, HILT was applied to eight trigger points, with four applications per point, continuing until pain reduction reached approximately 70-80%; a total of 200 J was delivered in this phase. The final phase was performed with slow manual scanning with the same parameters as the initial phase. The complete HILT procedure lasted around 30 minutes, with a total energy dose of approximately 2050 J (19).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HILT

Intervention Type OTHER

The first phase consisted of rapid manual scanning, delivering a total energy of 1000 J/cm². During the second phase, HILT was applied to eight trigger points, with four applications per point, continuing until pain reduction reached approximately 70-80%; a total of 200 J was delivered in this phase. The final phase was performed with slow manual scanning with the same parameters as the initial phase. The complete HILT procedure lasted around 30 minutes, with a total energy dose of approximately 2050 J (19).

CONTROL

Intervention Type OTHER

The home program involved stretching exercises for levator scapulae and upper trapezius, strengthening exercises for neck extensors, and scapular stabilizer exercises. Each exercise was executed with a 5-second hold and 10 repetitions per set, for a total of three sets repeated three times per week for 10 weeks.

LLLT

LLLT sessions were carried out using the diode laser device (Chattanooga Group, USA) of gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs, infrared laser) with an 850 nm wavelength, 800 mW power, and constant wave with 1 cm spot size was utilized for the treatment procedures. The laser probe was positioned directly on specific points along the cervical spine while the participant's head remained in a neutral position. Each point was treated for 2 minutes. A total of eight points were marked bilaterally over the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, covering an area of 24 cm². The total treatment duration was 18 minutes, with an energy dose of 2 J/cm² applied to each point (20).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LLLT

Intervention Type OTHER

The laser probe was positioned directly on specific points along the cervical spine while the participant's head remained in a neutral position. Each point was treated for 2 minutes. A total of eight points were marked bilaterally over the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, covering an area of 24 cm². The total treatment duration was 18 minutes, with an energy dose of 2 J/cm² applied to each point (20).

CONTROL

Intervention Type OTHER

The home program involved stretching exercises for levator scapulae and upper trapezius, strengthening exercises for neck extensors, and scapular stabilizer exercises. Each exercise was executed with a 5-second hold and 10 repetitions per set, for a total of three sets repeated three times per week for 10 weeks.

CONTROL

The home program involved stretching exercises for levator scapulae and upper trapezius, strengthening exercises for neck extensors, and scapular stabilizer exercises. Each exercise was executed with a 5-second hold and 10 repetitions per set, for a total of three sets repeated three times per week for 10 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CONTROL

Intervention Type OTHER

The home program involved stretching exercises for levator scapulae and upper trapezius, strengthening exercises for neck extensors, and scapular stabilizer exercises. Each exercise was executed with a 5-second hold and 10 repetitions per set, for a total of three sets repeated three times per week for 10 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HILT

The first phase consisted of rapid manual scanning, delivering a total energy of 1000 J/cm². During the second phase, HILT was applied to eight trigger points, with four applications per point, continuing until pain reduction reached approximately 70-80%; a total of 200 J was delivered in this phase. The final phase was performed with slow manual scanning with the same parameters as the initial phase. The complete HILT procedure lasted around 30 minutes, with a total energy dose of approximately 2050 J (19).

Intervention Type OTHER

LLLT

The laser probe was positioned directly on specific points along the cervical spine while the participant's head remained in a neutral position. Each point was treated for 2 minutes. A total of eight points were marked bilaterally over the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, covering an area of 24 cm². The total treatment duration was 18 minutes, with an energy dose of 2 J/cm² applied to each point (20).

Intervention Type OTHER

CONTROL

The home program involved stretching exercises for levator scapulae and upper trapezius, strengthening exercises for neck extensors, and scapular stabilizer exercises. Each exercise was executed with a 5-second hold and 10 repetitions per set, for a total of three sets repeated three times per week for 10 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Home program HOME PROGRAM

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* chonic neck pain lasting more than 30 days with no evidence of foraminal compression;
* age 18 years or older;
* experiencing considerable pain, stiffness, or discomfort localized to the neck area, without associated numbness or radiation of pain to the upper limbs;
* a visual analog scale (VAS) pain rating of 3 or above;
* no therapeutic intervention within the last month

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous cervical spine trauma or surgery;
* significant cervical disc prolapse, cervical nerve root compression or spinal cord manifestations;
* history of severe and frequent migraines, fibromyalgia, shoulder diseases, rheumatic or rheumatoid diseases, severe osteoporosis, mental illnesses, significant spinal deformities, or serious cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological diseases.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohammad Moustafa Aldosoukki Hegazy

Assisstant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mohammed Hegazy

Al Kharj, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ezzati K, Laakso EL, Saberi A, Yousefzadeh Chabok S, Nasiri E, Bakhshayesh Eghbali B. A comparative study of the dose-dependent effects of low level and high intensity photobiomodulation (laser) therapy on pain and electrophysiological parameters in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Dec;56(6):733-740. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05835-0. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31742366 (View on PubMed)

Alayat MSM, Alshehri MA, Shousha TM, Abdelgalil AA, Alhasan H, Khayyat OK, Al-Attar WS. The effectiveness of high intensity laser therapy in the management of spinal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(6):869-884. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181341.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30932879 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RHPT/022/041

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.