MENA Consensus on Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA) Biostimulator Use in Aesthetic Dermatology
NCT ID: NCT07261748
Last Updated: 2025-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
15 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-11-01
2026-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study uses a Modified Delphi method, a well-established approach for collecting and refining expert agreement. Dermatologists and aesthetic physicians from MENA countries will participate in two to three online rounds of surveys. In Round 1, experts will answer open-ended questions about indications, contraindications, dilution techniques, safety concerns, anatomical considerations, and training needs related to PLLA. Their responses will be analyzed and converted into structured statements.
In Round 2, experts will rate each statement using a 1-to-9 Likert scale, indicating their level of agreement. Items with high agreement will form part of the final consensus. Statements with uncertain or conflicting ratings may undergo a third round for clarification.
No patients are involved in the study, and no treatments or interventions will be administered. The study collects professional opinions only, and all responses are anonymized during analysis. The final output will be a region-specific clinical guideline to support safer and more standardized PLLA use across the MENA region. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared with the aesthetic medical community.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Consensus Guidelines for Pre- and Post-Procedure Skincare in Aesthetic Treatments
NCT07334353
Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) on the Esthetic Outcome and Scar Formation of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair
NCT02958306
An Open-label Study of Poly-l-lactic Acid for Correction of Wrinkles in the décolletage Area
NCT05538728
Evaluation of Microinjected Amnion-derived Collagen by Dermapen in the Smoothing of Skin Wrinkles
NCT06054646
Expert Consensus on the Clinical Use of Skin Boosters: A Delphi-Based Recommendation Framework
NCT07296601
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Design
This study uses a Modified Delphi methodology, incorporating principles from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. The Delphi process includes 2-3 survey rounds:
Round 1 (Qualitative Item Generation):
Experts complete an open-ended questionnaire addressing indications, contraindications, dilution protocols, injection techniques, safety concerns (including risk of papules and PIH), anatomical considerations, combination treatments, follow-up practices, regulatory issues, training requirements, and research priorities. Responses undergo thematic analysis to generate structured candidate statements.
Round 2 (Quantitative Consensus Rating):
The consolidated statements are rated using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = inappropriate, 9 = appropriate). Experts rate each item independently based on clinical relevance, safety, and applicability in MENA populations.
Optional Round 3:
Statements without clear consensus are redistributed with anonymized group statistics for re-rating. This step is used only if needed to refine borderline items.
Expert Panel Selection
Experts will be eligible if they meet at least two of the following:
* ≥5 years of aesthetic practice;
* ≥50 PLLA cases performed;
* Recognized trainer, lecturer, or KOL;
* Publications or academic contributions in aesthetic medicine;
* Active practice within Egypt or other MENA countries. Panel size will be 15-25 experts, ensuring geographic, academic, and experiential diversity.
Consensus Definitions
The study follows RAND/UCLA criteria:
* Consensus (Appropriate): Median 7-9 AND Disagreement Index (DI) \< 1.0
* Consensus (Inappropriate): Median 1-3 AND DI \< 1.0
* No Consensus: Median 4-6 OR DI ≥ 1.0
* Items with near-consensus may undergo a third Delphi round. Data Collection Tools
VRC-developed materials include:
* Full A-L Likert questionnaire
* Fillable PDF form
* Online REDCap/Google Forms instrument
* Round-2 survey booklet
* Excel master sheet for response tracking Statistical Analysis For each item, the following will be calculated: median, interquartile range, interpercentile range (IPR), IPR adjusted for symmetry (IPRAS), and the Disagreement Index. Items will be categorized by agreement level and summarized for publication. Subgroup analyses (e.g., GCC vs North Africa) may be performed.
Ethical Considerations This study does not involve patients, clinical interventions, or personal health information. Participation is voluntary. Expert responses are anonymized. No foreseeable risks are associated with participation, and the study qualifies as minimal-risk, non-interventional research.
Outcomes and Dissemination The primary outcome is a set of consensus-based, region-specific recommendations for PLLA use in aesthetic practice. Secondary outcomes include identification of training standards and research priorities. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and a VRC-branded clinical guideline.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Expert Panel
A cohort of dermatology and aesthetic medicine experts from the MENA region participating in a Modified Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations on PLLA biostimulator use.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum of 5 years of clinical experience OR ≥50 documented PLLA cases.
* Practicing within Egypt or the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.
* Willingness to participate in Delphi rounds and provide expert ratings.
* Ability to read and respond to surveys in English.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack of clinical experience with PLLA.
* Industry representatives without direct clinical practice.
25 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Venus Research Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Venus Research Center
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PLLA-VenusRC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.