Performance Comparison of Large Language Models in TAP Block Ultrasound Interpretation
NCT ID: NCT07261436
Last Updated: 2026-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-01-15
2026-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
How accurately can each AI model identify anatomical structures on TAP block ultrasound videos? Can the AI models correctly evaluate the spread of local anesthetic and determine whether the block is successful? How closely do the AI models' answers match the evaluations of expert anesthesiologists? No additional procedures will be performed on patients. TAP blocks will be done as part of routine clinical care, and the ultrasound videos will be recorded and de-identified.
Participants will not need to do anything extra for the study. Experienced anesthesiologists will review the videos and provide expert answers. The AI models will be given the same videos and asked the same questions. A second expert, who does not know which answers came from humans or AI, will compare all responses.
The results will help researchers understand whether advanced AI systems can safely support clinicians in interpreting ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia procedures and improve education and decision-making in anesthesia practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of US-guided TAP Block in Breast Reconstruction Surgery With Abdominal Myocutaneous Flap
NCT03699267
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of TAP Block and TFP Block in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT06853782
Transversus Abdominis Plan (TAP) Block In Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
NCT06762288
Prospective, Randomized Comparative Study Between an Anesthesiological, Ultrasound-guided, and a Laparoscopic, Landmark-based Application of a "Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block" Based on Postoperative Pain Perception, Postoperative Analgesic Requirement, and Procedure Duration
NCT06876155
TAP Block On Abdominal Surgery Patients With General Anesthesia
NCT04364477
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ultrasound Video Processing All ultrasound recordings will be fully de-identified by removing patient names, dates, and any other identifying information.
Gemini 2.5 Pro will receive original video files. ChatGPT-5.1 will receive high-resolution GIF segments generated from the same recordings.
Both models will be given identical structured prompts consisting of eight clinically relevant questions about anatomic structures, needle placement, local anesthetic spread, dermatomal effects, and potential safety concerns.
Expert Participation
Two anesthesiology experts will participate independently:
Expert A will review each ultrasound video and answer the same set of eight clinical questions. These answers will serve as the primary human clinical reference.
Expert B will independently evaluate all responses, those from Expert A, Gemini, and ChatGPT-5.1, after they have been anonymized and randomly ordered. Expert B will not know whether a response originated from an AI model or a human expert. Expert B will assess anatomical accuracy, clarity, clinical appropriateness, and overall content quality for each answer.
If Expert A and Expert B disagree on the interpretation or quality assessment of any response, a third expert (Expert C), who is also experienced in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, will independently review the relevant responses. Expert C's evaluation will be used to resolve discrepancies and establish the final consensus.
Data Collected
For each TAP block video, the following information will be recorded:
Ultrasound and procedural details. Patient demographic descriptors (age, sex, BMI, ASA classification), used only for general characterization of the sample.
AI-related performance features such as response completeness, relevance, confidence level, and response time.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Evaluation
Analysis of de-identified ultrasound videos by the Gemini 2.5 Pro artificial intelligence model. The model receives standardized prompts and provides anatomical interpretation, block success assessment, and clinical suggestion outputs.
ChatGPT-5.1 Evaluation
Analysis of de-identified ultrasound videos by the ChatGPT-5.1 artificial intelligence model. The model receives the same standardized questions and produces anatomical and clinical interpretations for comparison.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA I-III physical status
* Undergoing elective surgery with a lateral TAP block performed as part of routine anesthesia care
* Complete ultrasound-guided block procedure recorded on video
* Able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Poor-quality ultrasound video (needle tip or anesthetic spread not visible)
* Missing demographic or clinical data
* Withdrawal of consent at any time
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Engin Ihsan Turan
principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Health Science University İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Training Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUCCESS OF LLMs in TAP BLOCK
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.