Minto and Eleveld Remifentanil Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) Models: a Clinical Comparison

NCT ID: NCT07259291

Last Updated: 2025-12-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-25

Study Completion Date

2026-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Remifentanil is commonly used as an opioid during general anesthesia. In recent years, several pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models for target-controlled infusion (TCI) have been developed, with the Eleveld model being one of the most recent and designed for broad applicability.

The aim of this study is to compare the Eleveld TCI model with the routinely used Minto model, in order to evaluate potential differences in the predicted effect-site concentrations (CeR) required to achieve equivalent analgesia levels, as measured by qNOX (CONOX monitor) and the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI). Post-Tetanic Count (PTC) was also assessed during the maintenance phase to investigate possible differences in nociceptive index responses between the two TCI models.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Remifentanil is a short-acting synthetic opioid frequently used as part of balanced general anesthesia due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile, which includes rapid onset, short context-sensitive half-time, and predictable elimination. These properties make it ideal for administration via target-controlled infusion (TCI), allowing anesthesiologists to maintain a desired effect-site concentration (Ce) with high precision.

Over the past two decades, several pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models have been developed to guide TCI of remifentanil. Among these, the Minto model has been widely adopted in routine clinical practice. It was originally derived from data collected in healthy volunteers and incorporates covariates such as age, weight, height, and sex. However, its applicability across broader patient populations has been questioned, particularly in individuals outside the demographic or physiological range of the original dataset.

More recently, the Eleveld model has been introduced as a general-purpose model for remifentanil TCI. It was developed using a large pooled dataset covering a wide range of patient types, including pediatric, adult, and elderly individuals. This model aims to offer more accurate and consistent predictions of drug concentrations and effects across diverse clinical scenarios.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the Eleveld and Minto models with respect to the effect-site concentration (CeR) of remifentanil required to achieve comparable levels of intraoperative analgesia. Analgesia was assessed using two objective nociception monitors: the qNOX index (derived from the CONOX monitor) and the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI). These indices provide continuous, real-time information on the balance between nociceptive stimulation and the analgesic effect, allowing for a quantitative comparison between the two models.

To further explore the analgesic efficacy and responsiveness under each model, investigators introduced controlled nociceptive stimuli during the maintenance phase of anesthesia. Specifically, the Post-Tetanic Count (PTC) stimulation was applied during anesthesia maintenance to serve as a standardized noxious input. The response of the analgesia monitoring indices (qNOX and ANI) to this stimulus was analyzed, enabling the assessment of how each TCI model modulates analgesic depth in the face of a defined nociceptive challenge.

By comparing the CeR values, the baseline and post-stimulus nociception indices, and their temporal patterns under the two models, this study aims to determine whether the Eleveld model offers any clinical or pharmacodynamic advantages over the traditional Minto model in guiding remifentanil administration during general anesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Propofol Anesthesia Brain Monitoring Remifentanil

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Eleveld TCI

Patients who received general anesthesia with Eleveld TCI model for Propofol and Remifentanil (this model was choosen at anesthesiologist's discretion)

No interventions assigned to this group

Minto TCI

Patients who received general anesthesia with Eleveld TCI model for Propofol and Minto TCI for Remifentanil (this model was choosen at anesthesiologist's discretion)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergo general anaesthesia with Targeted Controlled Infusion of Propofol (Eleveld model) and Remifentanil (Minto or Eleveld model)

Exclusion Criteria

* Neurological disease
* Psychiatric disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Padova

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Federico Linassi

MD, PhD, Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana

Treviso, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Federico Linassi, MD

Role: primary

0422322440

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RemiMAST

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Reduction of Remifentanil-related Complications
NCT01003028 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4