Electronic Anesthetic Efficacy Prof. Ali Rokia Ph.D. Al-Andalus University Prof . Mouetaz Kheirallah Ph.D ArabUST

NCT ID: NCT07257432

Last Updated: 2025-12-02

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 30 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2025-09-24
• Study Completion Date: 2026-05-30

Brief Summary

A Spilt Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Electronic Anesthetic Efficacy Comparison of traditional local anesthesia with electronic local anesthesia in terms of the ability to reduce pain during injection and the duration of the anesthetic effect

Detailed Description

Study Design:

The mouth will be split in half using a split mouth study. The lower anterior teeth will be injected with a conventional local anesthetic syringe on one side, and the patient will be injected with an electronic anesthetic syringe on the other side.

The study will be conducted on a sample of volunteers aged 18 to 30 years at the Faculty of Dentistry at Al-Andalus University.

The objectives and procedure will be explained to each group of patients, and informed consent will be obtained from each patient to accept the research procedures.

A 2% non-vasoconstrictor lidocaine local anesthetic will be used for all patients.

Conditions

Pain Perception

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm

During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental group: Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm

Intervention Type: DRUG

Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side

control group: therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

Intervention Type: DRUG

During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side

therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental group: Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm

Intervention Type: DRUG

Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side

control group: therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

Intervention Type: DRUG

During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side

Interventions

Experimental group: Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm

Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side

Intervention Type: DRUG

control group: therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side

Intervention Type: DRUG

Other Intervention Names

anesthesia pen x; surgimax

Eligibility Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

allergic to local anesthetics ,females during menstural cycle ,bad oral care.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 20 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 30 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Mouetaz Kheirallah

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Mouetaz Kheirallah

Ph.D., OMFS, DDS, Associate Professor

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Ali G Rokia, ph.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Al-Andalus University

Locations

Al Andalus University

Tartous, Al Kadmous, Syria

Arab University

Hama, , Syria

Countries

Syria

References

Douglas BL. Electronic dental anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 1993;40(3):99-100. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 7645794 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

ArabUST

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id