Enhanced Recovery After Emergency Cesarean Section: A Comparative Study Assessing Postoperative Recovery and Outcomes
NCT ID: NCT07242924
Last Updated: 2025-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-12-01
2028-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Originally developed for colorectal surgery, ERAS principles have been successfully adapted to obstetric practice over the past decade. These evidence-based protocols emphasize multimodal interventions including preoperative counseling, optimized analgesia, early mobilization, and timely nutrition. In obstetrics, ERAS implementation has demonstrated reduced length of stay, decreased opioid use, and improved patient satisfaction for elective CS .
Application of ERAS to emergency CS requires special considerations due to the urgent nature of the procedure. Modified protocols focus on rapid preoperative assessment, regional anesthesia with intrathecal opioids, and immediate postoperative care initiation . Emerging evidence suggests these adaptations maintain benefits while accommodating time constraints . Key outcomes include reduced postoperative pain, earlier return of bowel function, and improved breastfeeding rates .
Current research demonstrates ERAS protocols can be safely implemented in emergency CS with proper staff training and institutional support . Ongoing studies continue to refine optimal practices, particularly regarding fluid management and thromboprophylaxis . As evidence accumulates, standardized guidelines for emergency CS ERAS pathways are expected to emerge .
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Elective Cesarean Sections
NCT07104890
Comparison of Outcome Between (ERACS) Versus Traditional Methods in Elective CS
NCT06225557
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Emergency Caesarean Deliveries
NCT03518463
Enhanced Recovery Versus Conventional Care After Cesarean Section
NCT04360382
Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAC) Protocol
NCT05786352
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
First audit cycle : compliance with intraoperative measures is obtained by direct observation . post-operative information will be obtained by patient interview and record audit. The quiality of recovery will be assessed just before discharge using the quality of recovery score (ObsQoR-11).
Corrective action : gaps identified by first audit cycle is translated into defined corrrective measures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for emergency cesarean section
Application of ERAS protocol delivered perioperatively and postoperatively as per institutional ERAS guidelines.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Other medical disorders as hypertensive disorder during pregnancy, cardiac disease.
* Intra-operative complications necessitating changes in post-operative care e.g. bowel injury, urinary tract injury.
* Hemodynamically unstable (post-partum hemorrhage)
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mahmoud Mohamed Abbady Hussein
Resident physician
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ERAS after emergency cs
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.