Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
17000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-01-31
2027-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To meet the requirements in delivering and auditing person-centred care within those standards, we need to answer the following questions:
* What are optimal methods for routine implementation of the PROM from the perspectives of stakeholders
* What are locally-relevant components of a Decision Support Tool to provide clinicians with appropriate evidence-based clinical responses to patient PROM scores
* What is an implementable Quality Improvement Programme to improve person-centred outcomes, informing (inter)national roll out with existing registry data?
The aim of this proposal is to develop a five-site demonstration patient-centred quality improvement programme determining feasibility, optimal implementation methods and data usage, and to deliver a framework for (inter)national adoption.
The objectives are:
* To develop a quality improvement team within each of our three demonstration sites and identify site-specific challenges and potential solutions (including IT) for PROM implementation.
* To develop an evidence-based Decision Support Tool (DST) specifying clinical responses to real-time PROM data from PLWH that are feasible within local resources, a PROM training programme for clinicians and a PLWH "mentor" for patients in each site
* Hold a quality improvement launch meeting to train on POSITIVE OUTCOMES and DST implementation.
* Implement the Positive Outcomes PROM in three demonstration sites
* Test impact on outcomes using annual quality improvement cycles at facility level Determine stakeholder (PLWH, clinician) views on the quality improvement mechanisms, impact and areas for further refinement.
* Develop and disseminate a national manual on implementation of the POSITIVE OUTCOMES quality improvement programme.
The project is working with 5 clinics across the UK and the US:
* King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (London, UK)
* Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (London, UK)
* Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (Brighton, UK)
* HOWARD BROWN Health Clinic (Chicago, US)
* CAN SUPPORT Community Health Center (Miami, US)
The observational model for the project is a quality improvement programme.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Family Centered Advanced Care Planning for Adolescents With HIV/AIDS and Their Families
NCT00723476
Positive Pregnancy Program
NCT03073421
Self- and Family-management Intervention in HIV+ Chinese Women
NCT03049332
Assisted Notification of Partners of Men Having Sex With Men Discovering Their Seropositivity
NCT06419491
Evaluation of an HIV Outreach Program
NCT00300183
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
People Living with HIV
POSITIVE OUTCOMES
POSITIVE OUTCOMES is a validated patient-reported outcome measure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
POSITIVE OUTCOMES
POSITIVE OUTCOMES is a validated patient-reported outcome measure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* able to consent to participate in the study
* able to communicate in English or a language provided by NHS translation services
* purposively sampled by age, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and time since HIV diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria
* not attending care at one of the recruitment sites
* not able to consent to participate in the study
* speaks a language not available through NHS translation services
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King's College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harding R, Clucas C, Lampe FC, Date HL, Fisher M, Johnson M, Edwards S, Anderson J, Sherr L. What factors are associated with patient self-reported health status among HIV outpatients? A multi-centre UK study of biomedical and psychosocial factors. AIDS Care. 2012;24(8):963-71. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.668175. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
Bristowe K, Clift P, James R, Josh J, Platt M, Whetham J, Nixon E, Post FA, McQuillan K, Ni Cheallaigh C, Murtagh F, Anderson J, Sullivan AK, Harding R. Towards person-centred care for people living with HIV: what core outcomes matter, and how might we assess them? A cross-national multi-centre qualitative study with key stakeholders. HIV Med. 2019 Sep;20(8):542-554. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12758. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
Bristowe K, Murtagh FEM, Clift P, James R, Josh J, Platt M, Whetham J, Nixon E, Post FA, McQuillan K, Cheallaigh CN, Kall M, Anderson J, Sullivan AK, Harding R. The development and cognitive testing of the positive outcomes HIV PROM: a brief novel patient-reported outcome measure for adults living with HIV. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 6;18(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01462-5.
Harding R, Jones CI, Bremner S, Bristowe K, West B, Siegert RJ, O'Brien KK, Whetham J; EMERGE Consortium, Horizon 2020. Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person-centred outcome measure for people with HIV. HIV Med. 2022 Jul;23(6):673-683. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13224. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IN-UK-985-6892
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.