Early Predictors for Neurological Outcome After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
NCT ID: NCT07210879
Last Updated: 2025-10-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
800 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-20
2026-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. MAP and vasopressors - determine whether continuous monitoring of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the use of vasopressors in the ICU influence neurological outcome.
2. Pharmacological interventions - evaluate the impact of other medications, particularly opioids in the acute stage, on recovery.
3. Biomarkers - identify diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (blood-borne or digital) from routine clinical measurements within the first year after injury.
Using high-frequency ICU data and advanced data science methods, the study seeks to provide insights that support individualized treatment strategies and improve outcomes after SCI.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT04565366
Assessment of the Effects of Early Proprioceptive Stimulations in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05094752
Monitoring Fatigue In Daily Life In Adults With Cerebral Palsy or Acquired Brain Injury
NCT07135791
Understanding Perinatal Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06808035
Biomarkers of Spontaneous Recovery From Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02731027
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data during the ICU stay would create an opportunity to investigate the relation of hemodynamic parameters, pharmacological interventions, and neurological recovery in a large cohort of individuals who sustained acute traumatic SCI.
A better understanding of the effect of interventions in the very acute stages of SCI on neurological recovery, as well as the identification of new biomarkers would be of utmost interest for physicians. The knowledge gain from this study could inform clinical decision-making in the future and would therefore ultimately improve the treatment of acute SCI.
Specific aims and hypothesis of the project:
AIM 1 Investigate if continuous monitoring of arterial pressure and augmentation via administration of vasopressors during the ICU stay affect the neurological outcome in individuals who sustained traumatic SCI.
Hypothesis 1.1 The administration of high doses of vasopressor medication within the acute stage of SCI negatively affects long-term neurological outcome.
Hypothesis 1.2 MAP goals need to be defined depending on several contributing factors, such as the patient's age, the presence of co-morbidities, and medication intake prior to the SCI instead of universal MAP targets for the whole SCI population.
AIM 2 Evaluate if other pharmacological interventions (opioids, sedatives, neuroleptics, pain medication especially neuropathic pain medication) during ICU stay are related to neurological recovery and adverse events after SCI.
Hypothesis Administration of high doses of opioids and sedatives negatively affect the neurological outcome after SCI.
AIM 3 Evaluate if diagnostic (for the presence and severity of SCI), and/or prognostic (for neurological recovery and disease progression) biomarkers (blood-borne, or digital) can be identified derived from routine clinical measurements during the first year after injury in clinical routine in the very acute post-injury phase.
Hypothesis 3 Biomarkers with either a diagnostic value (for injury severity) as well as prognostic markers (for neurological recovery and disease progression) could assist clinical decision-making and would therefore be of utmost interest for treating physicians, and for clinical research.
Detailed research plan:
We will retrospectively analyze routinely collected data from patients who sustained traumatic SCI, and were treated in the ICU at the Trauma Center Murnau (Germany). Data to be extracted from the patient data management system include medication (timing, dosage and cumulative dose), routine blood chemistry data, high frequency hemodynamic parameters, ventilation (duration and technique), and complications (infections, etc.) during the ICU stay. In the first step, we aim to investigate the effect of MAP monitoring, vasopressor administration, and other pharmacological interventions on neurological recovery. In a second step of analysis, we will evaluate if new biomarkers can be derived from routinely collected data. We anticipate that a better understanding of the relation between early interventions during intensive care and neurological recovery, as well as the identification of new biomarkers will inform clinical decision-making in the future and would therefore ultimately improve the treatment of acute SCI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MAP cohort
AIM 1 is to investigate if continuous monitoring of arterial pressure and augmentation via administration of vasopressors during the ICU stay affect the neurological outcome after traumatic SCI.
For this, data of 161 patients who underwent hemodynamic monitoring in the acute stage after traumatic SCI have been included in the analysis.
No interventions assigned to this group
Biomarker Cohort
AIM 3 is to evaluate if diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers can be derived from measurements in clinical routine.
For this analysis, we will include data from 747 patients who had at least five blood samples collected within the first year after injury, with the first sample obtained within two weeks post-injury, and who completed both acute and chronic neurological assessments.
No interventions assigned to this group
Opioid Cohort
AIM 2 is to evaluate if other pharmacological interventions - specifically opioids - during the ICU stay are related to neurological recovery after SCI.
For this, we will analyze data from approximately 240 individuals treated in our ICU who received opioid therapy, including detailed information on timing, dosage, and duration of administration, in relation to their acute and long-term neurological outcomes.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* completed at least one neurological examination in the acute / sub-acute stage of injury (between the day of injury and 40 days post-SCI) and in the chronic stage of injury (the latest neurological assessment between day 70 and day 546 after SCI)
* agreed to provide their medical data for research purposes in the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) database
specific for Cohort 1: MAP Cohort patients who
* were initially admitted to the BG Trauma Center Murnau, or transferred for acute SCI care within two days after trauma
* were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) and underwent hemodynamic monitoring for at least 24 hours
specific for Cohort 2: Biomarker Cohort - patients who had at least five blood samples collected within the first year after injury, with the first sample obtained within two weeks post-injury
specific for Cohort 3: Opioid Cohort
\- patients who were treated in the ICU and received opioid therapy, including detailed information on timing, dosage, and duration of administration
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who were initially admitted and/or surgically treated in another hospital and transferred to the BG Trauma Center Murnau later than two days post-SCI
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Foundation Wings For Life
OTHER
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
BG Unfallklinik Murnau
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Iris Leister
Head of Research SCI
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BG Trauma Center Murnau
Murnau am Staffelsee, Bavaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22057
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.