SIS-Reinforced vs. Conventional Anastomosis for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter RCT on Anastomotic Leak
NCT ID: NCT07209787
Last Updated: 2025-10-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
966 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-08
2027-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions the study aims to answer are:
Does using an SIS-reinforced connection reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery compared to standard connection methods?
Does it also reduce the need for a temporary stoma (an opening in the abdomen for waste removal)?
Researchers will compare two groups:
Intervention group: Patients who receive the SIS-reinforced connection during surgery.
Control group: Patients who receive the standard connection without reinforcement.
Participants in this study will:
Be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group.
Undergo standard laparoscopic or robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery.
Be followed up at 30 days, 90 days, and 12 months after surgery to check for complications, stoma status, and quality of life.
This study is being conducted across multiple hospitals in China to ensure the results are reliable and widely applicable.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Safety and Efficiency of Stent-based Diverting Technique Versus Ileostomy in Rectal Cancer Patients
NCT06204497
Constructing a Multimodal Imaging System to Predict the Risk of Heterochronous Metastasis of Rectal Cancer
NCT06293612
A Clinical Trial Comparing Staged Turnbull-Cutait Pull-through Anastomosis With Direct Anastomosis Plus Prophylactic Ileostomy in the Treatment of Low Rectal Cancer After Internal Sphincter Resection
NCT06662643
Cross-sectional Study of Anorectal Function and Quality of Life in Patients With Middle and Low Rectal Cancer
NCT04697303
Reducing the Resection Range After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Upper Rectal and Rectosigmoid Junction Cancers
NCT07038122
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention arm
SIS-reinforced anastomosis
This intervention uses a porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) reinforcement patch during rectal anastomosis. The sterile, biologic, acellular mesh is mounted onto the stapler anvil and cartridge. When fired, it encircles and externally reinforces the staple line. This provides immediate mechanical support and promotes healing by serving as a scaffold for tissue integration. It is a single-use, resorbable material intended to reduce anastomotic leakage by improving seal integrity, distinguishing it from standard unreinforced stapling or other synthetic/biologic grafts.
control group
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SIS-reinforced anastomosis
This intervention uses a porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) reinforcement patch during rectal anastomosis. The sterile, biologic, acellular mesh is mounted onto the stapler anvil and cartridge. When fired, it encircles and externally reinforces the staple line. This provides immediate mechanical support and promotes healing by serving as a scaffold for tissue integration. It is a single-use, resorbable material intended to reduce anastomotic leakage by improving seal integrity, distinguishing it from standard unreinforced stapling or other synthetic/biologic grafts.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with mid - low rectal cancer, where the lower edge of the cancer focus is ≤ 10 cm from the anus and who can undergo rectal anastomosis with a circular stapler (including mid - low and some ultra - low rectal anastomoses). This includes patients after neoadjuvant therapy, patients with insufficient function of important organs such as the heart, liver, and kidneys who can tolerate surgery, and patients after intestinal obstruction stent placement or chemotherapy after intestinal obstruction stent placement.
3. For patients who, after being fully informed by doctors, still clearly refuse neoadjuvant therapy (for advanced rectal cancer) and/or immunotherapy (for MSI - H/dMMR rectal cancer) and request direct surgery, they are generally not included in this study. If a patient insists on enrolling, the operating surgeon must have a second conversation with the patient and/or their family members, and sign in the medical record to confirm the following: The patient is aware of the existence of the neoadjuvant therapy/immunotherapy pathway but refuses the relevant treatment and insists on direct surgery. Only in this case can the patient be allowed to enroll.
4. Patients who received conversion therapy due to distant organ (such as liver, lung) metastasis before surgery and then underwent surgery with primary anastomosis can be included in this study. If organ metastasis is accidentally found during surgery, or if the small intestine or bladder in the pelvic floor is invaded, but the surgeon believes it does not affect rectal anastomosis, the patient does not need to withdraw from the study.
5. The patient or their authorized representative voluntarily signs the informed consent form and can cooperate to complete the follow - up during the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who are currently participating in other clinical studies.
3. Since the test device (SIS reinforcement patch) is derived from porcine - sourced materials, out of respect for specific religious beliefs (such as Islam), we do not recommend that subjects whose beliefs prohibit contact with porcine - sourced products participate in this study. We will fully communicate this situation with all potential subjects, and the subjects will make their own decisions based on their personal beliefs and cultural backgrounds.
4. Patients who do not meet the NCCN and the National Health Commission of China's treatment standards for rectal cancer will not be included in this study. For example, patients who should receive neoadjuvant therapy before surgery should preferentially choose neoadjuvant therapy, and MSI - H/dMMR patients are required to undergo immunotherapy first.
5. Due to the possible difficulty in matching the number of patients/omissions with regular patients, patients who require lateral lymph node dissection and those who receive Ta - TME will not be included in this study.
6. Patients who, due to language or intellectual disabilities, cannot understand the content of the trial protocol, cannot complete the follow - up, or for whom the researcher deems there are other situations that are not suitable for enrollment (such as uncontrolled severe underlying diseases, mental illness, etc.).
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Huashan Hospital
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University
OTHER
Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital
OTHER
People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
OTHER
Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University
UNKNOWN
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
OTHER
Hubei Cancer Hospital
OTHER
Hunan Provincial People's Hospital
OTHER
Tongji Hospital
OTHER
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Second Hospital of Jilin University
OTHER
The Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital
UNKNOWN
The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Gansu, China
UNKNOWN
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
OTHER
Nanjing Jiangning Hospital
UNKNOWN
The First Affiliated Hospital of BaoTou Medical College
OTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
OTHER
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
OTHER
NORTHERN JIANGSU PEOPLE'S HOSPITAL 1900
UNKNOWN
Suzhou Municipal Hospital
OTHER
Taizhou People's Hospital
UNKNOWN
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
OTHER
Zhongnan Hospital
OTHER
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
OTHER
Yunnan Cancer Hospital
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University
UNKNOWN
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
OTHER
PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center
OTHER
The General Hospital of Western Theater Command
OTHER
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
OTHER
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
OTHER
Zhoukou Central Hospital
OTHER
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing chaoyang hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-科-689
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.