Patient Satisfaction With At-home Dental Bleaching Using Orthodontic Retainers With Different Margin Designs

NCT ID: NCT07208708

Last Updated: 2025-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-07

Study Completion Date

2025-07-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial evaluated patient satisfaction with at-home dental bleaching using orthodontic retainers with different margin designs, as well as bleaching efficacy, tooth sensitivity (TS), and gingival irritation (GI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of the study will be to clinically evaluate patient satisfaction, as well as the effectiveness of colour change, tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation with home whitening using 10% carbamide peroxide performed with orthodontic retainers with different cut-outs. Forty patients will be selected to receive home teeth whitening with a straight or scalloped retainer on each half-arch (n=40). The whitening procedure will be performed with 10% carbamide peroxide (Pola Night 10%) for 2 hours over 14 days. Patient satisfaction will be assessed weekly for two weeks through a series of questions using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-10). Colour will be assessed initially, weekly for two weeks and 1 month after completion of whitening, using the subjective VITA Classical scale, VITA Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER and the objective VITA Easyshade spectrophotometer. The intensity and risk of tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation will be recorded on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-10). Patient satisfaction will be assessed using the paired Student's t-test. The colour change between the groups will be compared using the paired Student's t-test. The absolute risk of tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation in both groups will be compared using the McNemar test. The intensity of tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation will be analysed using the Student's t-test for paired samples. The significance level will be 5% in all statistical tests.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Satisfaction Bleaching Efficacy Tooth Sensitivity Gingival Irritation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Scalloped margin retainer

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Scalloped margin retainer

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient satisfaction was assessed during 2 weeks of whitening with a scalloped orthodontic retainer. Colour change, TS and IG were also measured. No studies have evaluated the effect of different margin designs in orthodontic retainers used in for tooth bleaching. Therefore, the present study aimed to clinically assess the impact of scalloped and straight margin design in orthodontic retainers employed for at-home bleaching, considering patient satisfaction, bleaching efficacy, tooth sensitivity (TS), and gingival irritation (GI).

Straight margin retainer

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Straight orthodontic retainer

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient satisfaction was assessed during two weeks of whitening with a straight orthodontic retainer. Colour change, TS and IG were also measured. No studies have evaluated the effect of different margin designs in orthodontic retainers used in for tooth bleaching. Therefore, the present study aimed to clinically assess the impact of scalloped and straight margin design in orthodontic retainers employed for at-home bleaching, considering patient satisfaction, bleaching efficacy, tooth sensitivity (TS), and gingival irritation (GI). The null hypotheses were that no significant differences would be observed in: (1) patient satisfaction, (2) bleaching efficacy, (3) tooth sensitivity, and (4) gingival irritation, when different margin designs are used in orthodontic retainers for at-home tooth bleaching.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Scalloped margin retainer

Patient satisfaction was assessed during 2 weeks of whitening with a scalloped orthodontic retainer. Colour change, TS and IG were also measured. No studies have evaluated the effect of different margin designs in orthodontic retainers used in for tooth bleaching. Therefore, the present study aimed to clinically assess the impact of scalloped and straight margin design in orthodontic retainers employed for at-home bleaching, considering patient satisfaction, bleaching efficacy, tooth sensitivity (TS), and gingival irritation (GI).

Intervention Type OTHER

Straight orthodontic retainer

Patient satisfaction was assessed during two weeks of whitening with a straight orthodontic retainer. Colour change, TS and IG were also measured. No studies have evaluated the effect of different margin designs in orthodontic retainers used in for tooth bleaching. Therefore, the present study aimed to clinically assess the impact of scalloped and straight margin design in orthodontic retainers employed for at-home bleaching, considering patient satisfaction, bleaching efficacy, tooth sensitivity (TS), and gingival irritation (GI). The null hypotheses were that no significant differences would be observed in: (1) patient satisfaction, (2) bleaching efficacy, (3) tooth sensitivity, and (4) gingival irritation, when different margin designs are used in orthodontic retainers for at-home tooth bleaching.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Completed of orthodontic treatment with Invisalign aligners (Align Technology Inc., CA, USA); willingness to undergo tooth bleaching as a complementary procedure; and current use of clear retainers. Additional criteria included age of ≥18 years of age, good general and oral health, and provision of informed consent. Eligible participants also needed anterior teeth free from carious and periodontal disease, with canines of shade A2 or darker on the VITA Classical scale (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) and a Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WID) value ≤15.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of previous bleaching; self-reported tooth sensitivity; continuous use of analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs; pregnancy or breastfeeding; and deleterious habits such as bruxism or smoking. Participants with anterior teeth presenting fixed orthodontic appliances, attachments, restorations, endodontic treatment, color changes due to tetracyclines or fluorosis, or visible enamel cracks were also excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Isabel Giráldez de Luis

PhD DDS

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

URJC_IDIBO_4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.