Validity of the Non-union Scoring System in Management of Long Bone Fracture Non-union

NCT ID: NCT07207447

Last Updated: 2025-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-10

Study Completion Date

2024-08-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to apply Calori Non union Scoring System on long bone non-union cases and evaluate the results of treatment o f the patients according to the score.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to apply Calori Non union Scoring System on long bone non-union cases and evaluate the results of treatment o f the patients according to the score. The study will be on patients with lower limb long bone diaphyseal fracture non-union. All patients will be assessed preoperatively by Clinical Evaluation: History, general examination, local examination, radiological evaluation: Plain X-ray films showing joint above and joint below the non-union site, laboratory Investigations: CBC, ESR, CRP and HbA1c. For patient allocation, patients will be divided into four groups according to the NUSS score, with group one (0-25 points) who underwent improving the stability and re-fixation with different modalities such as exchange plate with longer plate, intramedullary nailing, exchange nailing with larger diameter, plating over nail or dynamization of intramedullary nail. Group two (26-50 points) underwent re-fixation in addition to biological stimulation such as bone grafting, either with plate and bone graft, plate over nail and graft, or with external fixation with LRS or Ilizarov and grafting in one stage or two stages. Group three (51-75 points) required more complex care with resection of the non-union and dealing with the defect with bone transport, either direct transport or staged with cement spacer and later bone transport, Masquelet technique or acute compression and lengthening with another osteotomy. Group four (76-100 points) underwent amputation with consideration of prosthesis. The patients will be followed up at regular intervals as regard radiological and clinical evaluation until full union is achieved or non-union is established. The assessment includes; clinical and functional assessment based on pain at the fracture site and recovery of the usual activities or work, and radiological assessment based on plain radiograph x-rays, CT scan if needed to assess union. Radiological union is considered based on the presence of bridging callus (3/4 of cortices) in both anteroposterior and lateral views.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fracture Non Union

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NUSS group 1

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Improving the stability and re-fixation with different modalities

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Improving the stability and re-fixation with different modalities such as exchange plate with longer plate, intramedullary nailing, exchange nailing with larger diameter, plating over nail or dynamization of intramedullary nail.

NUSS group 2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Re-fixation with biological stimulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Re-fixation with biological stimulation such as bone grafting, either with plate and bone graft, plate over nail and graft, or with external fixation with LRS or Ilizarov and grafting in one stage or two stages.

NUSS group 3

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

complex care with non-union resection and bone reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

complex care with non-union resection and bone reconstruction, including resection of the non-union and dealing with the defect with bone transport, either direct transport or staged with cement spacer and later bone transport, Masquelet technique or acute compression and lengthening with another osteotomy.

NUSS group 4

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Amputation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Amputation with consideration of prosthesis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Improving the stability and re-fixation with different modalities

Improving the stability and re-fixation with different modalities such as exchange plate with longer plate, intramedullary nailing, exchange nailing with larger diameter, plating over nail or dynamization of intramedullary nail.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Re-fixation with biological stimulation

Re-fixation with biological stimulation such as bone grafting, either with plate and bone graft, plate over nail and graft, or with external fixation with LRS or Ilizarov and grafting in one stage or two stages.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

complex care with non-union resection and bone reconstruction

complex care with non-union resection and bone reconstruction, including resection of the non-union and dealing with the defect with bone transport, either direct transport or staged with cement spacer and later bone transport, Masquelet technique or acute compression and lengthening with another osteotomy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Amputation

Amputation with consideration of prosthesis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sex: both sexes.
* Age: Above 18 years old.
* Lesion: Tibial or femoral bone non-union.

Exclusion Criteria

* Skeletal immaturity.
* Any immunosuppressive drug therapy.
* Autoimmune disease.
* Neoplasia.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain Shams University

Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU MD21/2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fixation of Fracture Neck of Femur in Children
NCT06267885 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Fixation of Medial Malleolar Fractures .
NCT07148375 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Allograft vs. Autograft Nonunion
NCT07310082 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA