Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
350 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-02-04
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Among digital tools, orthopantomogram (OPT or panoramic) radiography is currently the most widely used. It provides a global view of the jaws, highlighting internal structures in 2D.
As in other fields, scientific advances have made it possible to go beyond the limited representation of two planes of space and obtain 3D images.
The intraoral scanner (IOS) or "optical impression camera" appeared in the mid-80s. They use light to create a digital optical impression that reproduces the surface of external anatomical structures in 3D images. It improves dental practice, making impressions less uncomfortable for patients, saving clinical time, facilitating storage and archiving, and facilitating transmission to the prosthetist where appropriate. This type of device is already well established in dental practices.
More recently, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has also begun to develop. This 3D sectional imaging technique adds an extra dimension to the exploration of internal structures.
Imaging examinations provide additional information to that obtained from the visual clinical oral examination. Together, they help the practitioner to establish the diagnosis and treatment plan.
Currently, visual information has to be collected manually. Collecting this data represents a significant amount of information. Its quality and completeness are crucial to the success of the treatment.
Given the high volume of consultations, and practitioners' need to optimize their time, it would be interesting to assess whether optical impressions, at least in part, could help to acquire this clinical data more systematically and more rapidly, in order to improve patient management.
Similarly, Cone Beam CT (CBCT), with its 3D data, improves the accuracy of diagnostic information. It would also be interesting to assess the real added value of this examination.
The RESTODATA-NUM study follows on from the RESTODATA study, the results of which provided recent information on the oral status of adult patients, and their care needs.
The aim of this study is to compare the performance of a standard real-life examination by the practitioner combining clinical and radiographic examinations (referred to here as practitioner-on-patient detection) on the one hand, and an examination based on imaging results obtained using digital tools on the other, in terms of detecting dental condition in a sample of adult patients consulting for an oral examination at one of the participating centers.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intraoral Scanners as Periodontal and Dental Pathologies Diagnosis Tools
NCT06006429
Detection of Periapical Lesions on Dental Panoramic Radiographs Based on Artificial Intelligence
NCT05888935
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Versus Intraoral Digital Radiography in Detection and Measurements of Simulated Periodontal Bone Defects
NCT03729843
Assessing the Precision of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dental Age Estimation From Panoramic Radiographs
NCT05901857
Intra Oral Scan and CBCT Aided Diagnosis of Dental Plaque and Caries
NCT06945354
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among digital tools, panoramic radiography (orthopantomogram) is currently the most widely used. It provides a comprehensive image of the jaws, highlighting internal structures in 2D. As in other fields, scientific advances have made it possible to go beyond two-dimensional representations and obtain 3D images.
The intraoral scanner, also known as an "optical impression camera," emerged in the mid-1980s. These devices use light to create a digital optical impression that reproduces the surface of external anatomical structures in 3D images. They improve dental practice by making impression-taking less uncomfortable for patients, saving clinical time, simplifying storage and archiving, and facilitating transmission to dental technicians when needed. This type of device is already well established in dental practices.
More recently, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), also known as digital volumetric tomography with a conical beam, has begun to develop. This 3D sectional imaging technique allows for the exploration of internal structures by adding an extra dimension.
Imaging examinations provide additional information that complements the findings of the visual clinical oral examination. Together, they help the practitioner establish a diagnosis and treatment plan. Currently, visual information must be recorded manually. Collecting this data represents a significant amount of information, and the success of treatment partly depends on its quality and completeness.
Given the high volume of consultations and the need for practitioners to optimize their time, it would be worthwhile to assess whether optical impressions could help systematically and quickly acquire some of this clinical data to improve patient care.
Similarly, the 3D data provided by CBCT enhances the accuracy of diagnostic information. It would also be useful to evaluate the actual added value of this examination.
The RESTODATA-NUM study follows on from the RESTODATA study, whose results provided recent insights into the oral health status and care needs of adult patients.
The objective of this study is to compare the performance of a standard real-life examination by a practitioner-combining clinical and radiographic assessments-with an examination based on imaging results obtained using digital tools, in terms of detecting dental conditions in a sample of adult patients undergoing an oral examination at one of the participating centers.
Information on the Type of Clinical Investigation:
This is an observational, descriptive, and multicenter study. Based on these characteristics, the study is initially classified by the principal investigator as a Category 3 research project under the Jardé Law (Article R1121-3 of the French Public Health Code, Decree No. 2006-477 of April 26, 2006). The digital tools used in this study (intraoral scanner, panoramic radiography, and cone beam computed tomography) are routinely employed in dental practices. Radiographs will only be performed when medically justified. There will be no deviation from standard patient care, and no additional procedures will be introduced.
Overview of the ReCOL Network and Participating Private Practices:
The ReCOL network is a French clinical research network in dentistry, inspired by a similar model in the United States. Its goal is to involve private dental practitioners in clinical studies. Established in 2018, ReCOL has already conducted several studies, many of which are available on its website: https://recol.fr. The network operates collaboratively, with research topics discussed within the association's executive board. The idea for the RESTODATA-NUM study emerged from one of these discussions.
A total of 36 dental surgeons, all equipped with the necessary tools for the study, responded positively to a call for participation sent via email to all ReCOL members. Some of these practitioners had previously participated in the RESTODATA study.
Study Procedure and Data Collection:
Each participant will attend a single study visit.
Eligibility will be assessed by the investigating dental surgeon. The study will be offered to all patients attending a participating center for an oral examination who meet the inclusion criteria.
An information letter will be provided to each patient. If no urgent care is required, patients may take up to seven days to consider participation and reschedule their appointment if desired. Upon agreement, the patient will sign a non-opposition form.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients affiliated with a social security scheme
* Patients aged 18 years or older
* New patients to the practice or patients who have not visited the practice in the past six months
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \< 18 years
* Individual under legal guardianship or curatorship
* Pregnant woman
* Patient currently undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Recherche Clinique en Odontologie (ReCOL)
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brigitte Grosgogeat, DDS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Service de Consultations et de Traitements Dentaires Hospices Civils de Lyon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cabinet dentaire Robbiani
Châtillon, , France
AP HP
Colombes, , France
Cabinet dentaire Ibn Attya Andaloussi
La Chapelle-sur-Erdre, , France
Cabinet dentaire Thiébaut
Landivisiau, , France
Cabinet dentaire Lemasson
Latresne, , France
Cabinet dentaire Pouchoulin
Les Côtes-d'Arey, , France
Cabinet dentaire Dougnac-Galant
Lyon, , France
AP HM
Marseille, , France
Cabinet dentaire Szerbojm
Ozoir-la-Ferrière, , France
Cabinet dentaire Martin
Paimpol, , France
Cabinet dentaire Drouhet
Paris, , France
Cabinet dentaire Huret
Paris, , France
Cabinet dentaire Labidi
Paris, , France
Cabinet dentaire Decup
Paris, , France
Cabinet dentaire Calvo
Quint-Fonsegrives, , France
CHU Reims
Reims, , France
CHU Rennes
Rennes, , France
Cabinet cabinet Perier
Saint-Marcellin-en-Forez, , France
Cabinet dentaire Guyon-Barras
Saint-Victor-de-Cessieu, , France
Cabinet dentaire Delacroix
Thorigné-Fouillard, , France
Cabinet dentaire Janisset-Masse
Villiers-sur-Marne, , France
Cabinet dentaire Enjary
La Saline, , Reunion
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM. The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986 Feb;2(1):20-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x. No abstract available.
Van der Velden U. The Dutch periodontal screening index validation and its application in The Netherlands. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Dec;36(12):1018-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01495.x.
Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G, Cutress T, Martin J, Sardo-Infirri J. Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). Int Dent J. 1982 Sep;32(3):281-91. No abstract available.
O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available.
Bartlett D, Ganss C, Lussi A. Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Mar;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S65-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0181-5. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
Ismail AI, Pitts NB, Tellez M; Authors of International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS); Banerjee A, Deery C, Douglas G, Eggertsson H, Ekstrand K, Ellwood R, Gomez J, Jablonski-Momeni A, Kolker J, Longbottom C, Manton D, Martignon S, McGrady M, Rechmann P, Ricketts D, Sohn W, Thompson V, Twetman S, Weyant R, Wolff M, Zandona A. The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) An Example of a Caries Management Pathway. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S9. Epub 2015 Sep 15. No abstract available.
Decup F, Dantony E, Chevalier C, David A, Garyga V, Tohme M, Gueyffier F, Nony P, Maucort-Boulch D, Grosgogeat B. Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):789-801. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
Kaasalainen T, Ekholm M, Siiskonen T, Kortesniemi M. Dental cone beam CT: An updated review. Phys Med. 2021 Aug;88:193-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
Schmalzl J, Roth I, Borbely J, Hermann P, Vecsei B. The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02926-y.
Chi J. Digital Impressions and In-Office CAD/CAM: A Review of Best Practices and What's to Come. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2021 Mar;42(3):140-141.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RECOL 2024-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.