Effect of Neurodynamic Mobilization in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation

NCT ID: NCT07203560

Last Updated: 2025-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-04

Study Completion Date

2019-05-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effects of neurodynamic mobilization on pain intensity, normal joint motion, neurodynamics, functional level, and disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Low back pain is a major cause of disability worldwide, and due to the limited effectiveness of current treatments, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of neurodynamic mobilization technique on pain intensity, range of motion, neurodynamics, functional status, and disability in patients.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients were randomized to control or mobilization group. Participants in the control group received a conventional therapy for 20 treatment sessions, and those in the mobilization group were treated neurodynamic mobilization in addition to the electro/thermal therapy program twice a week for 4 consecutive weeks. Pain level at rest and during activity was recorded with a Visual Analog Scale. Active lumbar flexion, extension, and lateral flexion were measured with a universal goniometer. Neurodynamic mobility was evaluated using neurodynamic tests. The functional status was assessed with the 30-second chair stand test and disability was evaluated with the Bournemouth Questionnaire. 2x2 repeated measures ANOVA models were used to determine within and between group differences.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Disc Herniation Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Control group received a conventional physiotherapy program; intervention group received the same program plus neurodynamic mobilization. Treatments were delivered over 4 consecutive weeks. Outcomes included pain, ROM, neurodynamic mobility, functional status and disability.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neurodynamic Mobilization + Conventional Therapy (Experimental Group)

Participants received the conventional physiotherapy program plus neurodynamic mobilization administered by a physical therapist. Treatment was given 5 days a week for 4 weeks, for a total of 20 sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Neurodynamic Mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

In the experimental group, neurodynamic mobilization was applied in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program. For the neurodynamic mobilization tibial nerve neural mobilization was performed. For neural mobilization of the tibial nerve, the patient was placed in the side-lying position with the hip in 90° flexion, knee flexion and ankle dorsi flexion. In this position, the ankle and hip positions were maintained, and knee extension was performed. When the symptoms were at a level that would not disturb the patient, it was held for 5 seconds, and knee flexion was performed by plantar flexion of the ankle. This practice was performed twice a week with 10 repetitions by a physiotherapist. The same neurodynamic mobilization exercise was recommended to the patients in the neuromobilization group as a home program with 10 repetitions twice a day.

Conventional Physiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

All participants received hot pack therapy (20 minutes), conventional TENS (60 Hz, 60 msec, 20 minutes), therapeutic ultrasound (1.5 W/cm², 10 minutes), and a prescribed home exercise program, delivered 5 days per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions in total).

Conventional Therapy (Control Group)

Individuals in control group received hot therapy (Hotpack, 20 minutes), Conventional Tens (60 Hz, 60 msec, 20 minutes) and Therapeutic Ultrasound (1.5 w/cm2, 10 minutes). Patients were given an exercise program to do at home and the treatment was given 5 days a week for 4 weeks, for a total of 20 sessions, to all patients in the study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Physiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

All participants received hot pack therapy (20 minutes), conventional TENS (60 Hz, 60 msec, 20 minutes), therapeutic ultrasound (1.5 W/cm², 10 minutes), and a prescribed home exercise program, delivered 5 days per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions in total).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neurodynamic Mobilization

In the experimental group, neurodynamic mobilization was applied in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program. For the neurodynamic mobilization tibial nerve neural mobilization was performed. For neural mobilization of the tibial nerve, the patient was placed in the side-lying position with the hip in 90° flexion, knee flexion and ankle dorsi flexion. In this position, the ankle and hip positions were maintained, and knee extension was performed. When the symptoms were at a level that would not disturb the patient, it was held for 5 seconds, and knee flexion was performed by plantar flexion of the ankle. This practice was performed twice a week with 10 repetitions by a physiotherapist. The same neurodynamic mobilization exercise was recommended to the patients in the neuromobilization group as a home program with 10 repetitions twice a day.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional Physiotherapy

All participants received hot pack therapy (20 minutes), conventional TENS (60 Hz, 60 msec, 20 minutes), therapeutic ultrasound (1.5 W/cm², 10 minutes), and a prescribed home exercise program, delivered 5 days per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions in total).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 20 and 60 years
* Diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation at one or more of the L3-L4, L4-L5
* L5-S1 levels with prolapsed, protruding, or extruding disc confirmed by MRI
* Presence of low back pain for at least 6 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria

* Spinal stenosis
* Previous lumbar surgery or medical treatment for disc herniation
* Pregnancy
* Severe osteoporosis
* Diabetes mellitus
* Severe neurological deficit
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gurkan Gunaydin

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gurkan Gunaydin

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gazi University Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation

Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ADU-FTR-GG-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.