Effect of Neurodynamic Mobilization in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT ID: NCT07203560
Last Updated: 2025-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-04
2019-05-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Is Regression Possible in Lumbal Disc Herniation With Spinal Mobilization Applications?
NCT05753579
The Effect of Mobilization Protocol Assisted With Simulated Clinical Immersion Videos on Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT05462210
The Effect of Manual Therapy on Psychological Factors and Quality of Life in Lumbal Disc Herniation Patients
NCT05804357
Rehabilitation in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT05544331
Efficacy of Mechanical Traction and Spinal Decompression Treatments in Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT05617924
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: Thirty-seven patients were randomized to control or mobilization group. Participants in the control group received a conventional therapy for 20 treatment sessions, and those in the mobilization group were treated neurodynamic mobilization in addition to the electro/thermal therapy program twice a week for 4 consecutive weeks. Pain level at rest and during activity was recorded with a Visual Analog Scale. Active lumbar flexion, extension, and lateral flexion were measured with a universal goniometer. Neurodynamic mobility was evaluated using neurodynamic tests. The functional status was assessed with the 30-second chair stand test and disability was evaluated with the Bournemouth Questionnaire. 2x2 repeated measures ANOVA models were used to determine within and between group differences.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neurodynamic Mobilization + Conventional Therapy (Experimental Group)
Participants received the conventional physiotherapy program plus neurodynamic mobilization administered by a physical therapist. Treatment was given 5 days a week for 4 weeks, for a total of 20 sessions.
Neurodynamic Mobilization
In the experimental group, neurodynamic mobilization was applied in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program. For the neurodynamic mobilization tibial nerve neural mobilization was performed. For neural mobilization of the tibial nerve, the patient was placed in the side-lying position with the hip in 90° flexion, knee flexion and ankle dorsi flexion. In this position, the ankle and hip positions were maintained, and knee extension was performed. When the symptoms were at a level that would not disturb the patient, it was held for 5 seconds, and knee flexion was performed by plantar flexion of the ankle. This practice was performed twice a week with 10 repetitions by a physiotherapist. The same neurodynamic mobilization exercise was recommended to the patients in the neuromobilization group as a home program with 10 repetitions twice a day.
Conventional Physiotherapy
All participants received hot pack therapy (20 minutes), conventional TENS (60 Hz, 60 msec, 20 minutes), therapeutic ultrasound (1.5 W/cm², 10 minutes), and a prescribed home exercise program, delivered 5 days per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions in total).
Conventional Therapy (Control Group)
Individuals in control group received hot therapy (Hotpack, 20 minutes), Conventional Tens (60 Hz, 60 msec, 20 minutes) and Therapeutic Ultrasound (1.5 w/cm2, 10 minutes). Patients were given an exercise program to do at home and the treatment was given 5 days a week for 4 weeks, for a total of 20 sessions, to all patients in the study.
Conventional Physiotherapy
All participants received hot pack therapy (20 minutes), conventional TENS (60 Hz, 60 msec, 20 minutes), therapeutic ultrasound (1.5 W/cm², 10 minutes), and a prescribed home exercise program, delivered 5 days per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions in total).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neurodynamic Mobilization
In the experimental group, neurodynamic mobilization was applied in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program. For the neurodynamic mobilization tibial nerve neural mobilization was performed. For neural mobilization of the tibial nerve, the patient was placed in the side-lying position with the hip in 90° flexion, knee flexion and ankle dorsi flexion. In this position, the ankle and hip positions were maintained, and knee extension was performed. When the symptoms were at a level that would not disturb the patient, it was held for 5 seconds, and knee flexion was performed by plantar flexion of the ankle. This practice was performed twice a week with 10 repetitions by a physiotherapist. The same neurodynamic mobilization exercise was recommended to the patients in the neuromobilization group as a home program with 10 repetitions twice a day.
Conventional Physiotherapy
All participants received hot pack therapy (20 minutes), conventional TENS (60 Hz, 60 msec, 20 minutes), therapeutic ultrasound (1.5 W/cm², 10 minutes), and a prescribed home exercise program, delivered 5 days per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions in total).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation at one or more of the L3-L4, L4-L5
* L5-S1 levels with prolapsed, protruding, or extruding disc confirmed by MRI
* Presence of low back pain for at least 6 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous lumbar surgery or medical treatment for disc herniation
* Pregnancy
* Severe osteoporosis
* Diabetes mellitus
* Severe neurological deficit
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gurkan Gunaydin
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gurkan Gunaydin
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gazi University Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ADU-FTR-GG-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.