Uses of Phantom Sensations Induced by Global and Local Modifications of the Prosthetic Socket as Somatosensory Feedback During Walking in Lower Limb Amputees

NCT ID: NCT07191795

Last Updated: 2025-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

228 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-16

Study Completion Date

2030-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Following lower-limb amputation, the loss of somatosensory information from the missing limb renders walking less automatic, more cognitively demanding, and often asymmetric, which can lead to secondary pathologies.

Hypothesis: This study is based on the hypothesis that phantom limb sensations (PLS), when coherent with the prosthetic device's movements and the phases of the gait cycle, can compensate for the loss of somatosensory feedback and thereby improve locomotion for individuals with amputation. It is further hypothesized that it is possible to artificially induce these coherent and useful sensations, notably through "referred sensations" elicited by stimulation of the residual limb (e.g., via the prosthetic socket).

Objectives: The project aims to:

* Determine whether the natural presence of phantom limb sensations during walking impacts gait parameters.
* Confirm in a larger patient population that modifications to the prosthetic socket can induce or enhance phantom sensations that are perceived as useful for walking.
* Investigate whether these perceptual changes (induced or enhanced) are associated with objective, measurable improvements in gait quality.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Limb Amputation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TT

People with transtibial amputation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gait analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants with unilateral amputations and a control group will undergo a comprehensive walking analysis. In a lab setting (on a treadmill or floor), their gait will be recorded using inertial sensors, EMG, force plates, and motion capture, while an EEG cap and a NASA-TLX questionnaire will assess cognitive load. Capable participants will also perform a walking test on a real-world outdoor course with varied terrain. The data will be analyzed to compare walking patterns between groups (amputees vs. controls, and amputees with vs. without phantom limbs). Finally, participants will describe any interactions they perceived between their phantom sensations and walking during the tests.

Mapping of referred sensations.

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants reporting referred sensations in gait analysis phase will undergo further testing. The study will investigate whether prosthesis pressure or a specific socket interaction causes these sensations. A 3x3 cm grid will be drawn on the residual limb to systematically map referred sensations using various stimuli (brush, pressure tip, electrical stimulation). Participants will rate the intensity and describe the location of any resulting phantom sensations. This mapping will be repeated after 6 months to assess the stability of these sensations over time, with the ultimate goal of potentially using them to provide sensory feedback for prosthesis users. The session will last approximately 2 hours.

Phantom limb interview

Intervention Type OTHER

A semi-structured interview will be conducted to ask participants to describe their phantom limb sensations (type, location, intensity) under three conditions: without their prosthesis, while standing with it, and while walking with it. This aims to identify factors influencing these sensations. Additionally, a brief physical examination of the residual limb will be performed to see if touch in specific areas triggers any referred sensations.

TF

People with transfemoral amputation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gait analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants with unilateral amputations and a control group will undergo a comprehensive walking analysis. In a lab setting (on a treadmill or floor), their gait will be recorded using inertial sensors, EMG, force plates, and motion capture, while an EEG cap and a NASA-TLX questionnaire will assess cognitive load. Capable participants will also perform a walking test on a real-world outdoor course with varied terrain. The data will be analyzed to compare walking patterns between groups (amputees vs. controls, and amputees with vs. without phantom limbs). Finally, participants will describe any interactions they perceived between their phantom sensations and walking during the tests.

Mapping of referred sensations.

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants reporting referred sensations in gait analysis phase will undergo further testing. The study will investigate whether prosthesis pressure or a specific socket interaction causes these sensations. A 3x3 cm grid will be drawn on the residual limb to systematically map referred sensations using various stimuli (brush, pressure tip, electrical stimulation). Participants will rate the intensity and describe the location of any resulting phantom sensations. This mapping will be repeated after 6 months to assess the stability of these sensations over time, with the ultimate goal of potentially using them to provide sensory feedback for prosthesis users. The session will last approximately 2 hours.

Exploration of the areas of the brain activated during referred sensations

Intervention Type OTHER

Unilateral transfemoral amputees with detailed referred sensation maps will have their brain activity recorded using a 64-electrode EEG cap. Non-invasive stimuli will be applied to four specific sites: an area on the residual limb that elicits a referred sensation, the corresponding location on the intact foot, a neutral area on the residual limb, and its corresponding location on the intact thigh. This process, involving 400 total stimulations, will be repeated after 6 months to track cortical changes. Non-amputee participants will also be tested as a control group to check for symmetry in brain responses to thigh stimulation. Each session lasts about 2 hours.

Evaluation of the effects of socket modifications on phantom sensations and walking

Intervention Type OTHER

This phase will evaluate how socket modifications affect phantom sensations and walking in 10 transfemoral amputees. First, the best material to comfortably induce referred sensations will be determined in a small sub-study. Then, each participant will be tested under four conditions: their usual socket and a socket with different rigidity, both with and without a specific local pressure point added inside. The location of this pressure point is based on the user's sensation map. Participants' walking will be analyzed in both lab and real-world environments for each condition, and they will provide feedback on their sensations and which setup they find most helpful. The evaluation involves 4 sessions over 2-3 months

Phantom limb interview

Intervention Type OTHER

A semi-structured interview will be conducted to ask participants to describe their phantom limb sensations (type, location, intensity) under three conditions: without their prosthesis, while standing with it, and while walking with it. This aims to identify factors influencing these sensations. Additionally, a brief physical examination of the residual limb will be performed to see if touch in specific areas triggers any referred sensations.

Control

Asymptomatic people

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gait analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants with unilateral amputations and a control group will undergo a comprehensive walking analysis. In a lab setting (on a treadmill or floor), their gait will be recorded using inertial sensors, EMG, force plates, and motion capture, while an EEG cap and a NASA-TLX questionnaire will assess cognitive load. Capable participants will also perform a walking test on a real-world outdoor course with varied terrain. The data will be analyzed to compare walking patterns between groups (amputees vs. controls, and amputees with vs. without phantom limbs). Finally, participants will describe any interactions they perceived between their phantom sensations and walking during the tests.

Exploration of the areas of the brain activated during referred sensations

Intervention Type OTHER

Unilateral transfemoral amputees with detailed referred sensation maps will have their brain activity recorded using a 64-electrode EEG cap. Non-invasive stimuli will be applied to four specific sites: an area on the residual limb that elicits a referred sensation, the corresponding location on the intact foot, a neutral area on the residual limb, and its corresponding location on the intact thigh. This process, involving 400 total stimulations, will be repeated after 6 months to track cortical changes. Non-amputee participants will also be tested as a control group to check for symmetry in brain responses to thigh stimulation. Each session lasts about 2 hours.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gait analysis

Participants with unilateral amputations and a control group will undergo a comprehensive walking analysis. In a lab setting (on a treadmill or floor), their gait will be recorded using inertial sensors, EMG, force plates, and motion capture, while an EEG cap and a NASA-TLX questionnaire will assess cognitive load. Capable participants will also perform a walking test on a real-world outdoor course with varied terrain. The data will be analyzed to compare walking patterns between groups (amputees vs. controls, and amputees with vs. without phantom limbs). Finally, participants will describe any interactions they perceived between their phantom sensations and walking during the tests.

Intervention Type OTHER

Mapping of referred sensations.

Participants reporting referred sensations in gait analysis phase will undergo further testing. The study will investigate whether prosthesis pressure or a specific socket interaction causes these sensations. A 3x3 cm grid will be drawn on the residual limb to systematically map referred sensations using various stimuli (brush, pressure tip, electrical stimulation). Participants will rate the intensity and describe the location of any resulting phantom sensations. This mapping will be repeated after 6 months to assess the stability of these sensations over time, with the ultimate goal of potentially using them to provide sensory feedback for prosthesis users. The session will last approximately 2 hours.

Intervention Type OTHER

Exploration of the areas of the brain activated during referred sensations

Unilateral transfemoral amputees with detailed referred sensation maps will have their brain activity recorded using a 64-electrode EEG cap. Non-invasive stimuli will be applied to four specific sites: an area on the residual limb that elicits a referred sensation, the corresponding location on the intact foot, a neutral area on the residual limb, and its corresponding location on the intact thigh. This process, involving 400 total stimulations, will be repeated after 6 months to track cortical changes. Non-amputee participants will also be tested as a control group to check for symmetry in brain responses to thigh stimulation. Each session lasts about 2 hours.

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluation of the effects of socket modifications on phantom sensations and walking

This phase will evaluate how socket modifications affect phantom sensations and walking in 10 transfemoral amputees. First, the best material to comfortably induce referred sensations will be determined in a small sub-study. Then, each participant will be tested under four conditions: their usual socket and a socket with different rigidity, both with and without a specific local pressure point added inside. The location of this pressure point is based on the user's sensation map. Participants' walking will be analyzed in both lab and real-world environments for each condition, and they will provide feedback on their sensations and which setup they find most helpful. The evaluation involves 4 sessions over 2-3 months

Intervention Type OTHER

Phantom limb interview

A semi-structured interview will be conducted to ask participants to describe their phantom limb sensations (type, location, intensity) under three conditions: without their prosthesis, while standing with it, and while walking with it. This aims to identify factors influencing these sensations. Additionally, a brief physical examination of the residual limb will be performed to see if touch in specific areas triggers any referred sensations.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants with amputations:

* Major lower limb amputation
* Understand and be able to express oneself in the French language (for semi-structured interviews)
* Affiliated with a social security scheme
* Asymptomatic volunteer participants:

* No major surgery on the lower limbs for at least 3 years
* No minor injury to the trunk, lower or upper limbs that could influence walking for at least 1 year
* Understand and be able to express oneself in the French language
* Affiliated with a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria

* History of psychiatric disorders
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* Minor
* Adult subject to a legal protection measure
* Person under guardianship or conservatorship
* Person under a judicial protection order
* Pain affecting walking (trunk, residual limb, phantom limb, contralateral limb)
* Medical treatment incompatible with walking
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinique Chantecler

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Orthopédique Maguelone

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Helio Marin

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut universitaire de réadaptation Valmante Sud

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut des Sciences du Mouvement

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Union de Gestion des Etablissements des Caisses d'Assurance Maladie - Nord Est

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amelie A Touillet

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation

Nancy, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jonathan J Pierret, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+33383526761

Christelle C Requena

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jonathan Pierret, PhD

Role: primary

+33382526761

Christelle Requena

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANR-23-CE17-0067-02

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2022-A01647-36

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.