The Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Versus Methotrexate in the Treatment of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia in Routine Clinical Care: a Patient Preference Trial (FFA Trial)
NCT ID: NCT07190534
Last Updated: 2025-09-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-11-30
2027-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Adults with FFA who choose to start either HCQ or MTX and will be followed for up to 48 weeks.
The main goal is to see how well each medicine helps reduce disease activity, measured by a tool called the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) after 6 months. At each clinic visit, participants will also complete short questionnaires about symptoms, quality of life, and general well-being.
By collecting this information, the study hopes to provide better evidence about how well HCQ and MTX work for FFA, which may help guide future treatment recommendations.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
a Retrospective Study on the Systemic Treatment of LPP and FFA
NCT06512766
Plaquenil for Alopecia Areata, Alopecia Totalis
NCT00176982
The Efficiency Of The Methotrexate At Patients Affected By Grave Pelade
NCT02037191
Methotrexate Versus Triamcinilone Acetonide in Treatment of Recalcitrant Alopecia Areata
NCT06088147
Efficacy of Combined Microneedling With Methotrexate in Treatment of Alopecia Areata
NCT05485571
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment options are limited and largely empirical. Among systemic therapies, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX) are the most commonly prescribed in clinical practice. Both drugs are used off-label, and there is no consensus on their effectiveness. Existing studies are mostly retrospective or small-scale. As a result, clinical decision-making is highly variable and evidence-based guidelines are lacking.
This multicenter, prospective patient preference trial has been designed to evaluate the effectiveness of HCQ compared with MTX in adults with FFA under routine clinical care conditions.
Study procedures:
Eligible patients (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of FFA will be recruited at dermatology outpatient clinics.
Patients will select either HCQ (400 mg daily) or MTX (15 mg weekly, with folate supplementation), according to shared decision-making and standard prescribing protocols.
Follow-up will occur at regular intervals consistent with standard care: baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks.
The primary outcome is the change in Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS) between baseline and 24 weeks. FFASS is a validated composite tool incorporating clinical signs, hairline recession, and patient symptoms.
Secondary outcomes include disease severity across all time points, patient-reported health-related quality of life (Skindex-29, CASIS), adverse events, discontinuation rates, and cost-effectiveness based on health economics instruments (EQ-5D-5L with bolt-ons, ICECAP-A, iMCQ, iPCQ). All FFASS assessments will be performed by two raters using standardized clinical photography and trichoscopy.
Sample size and feasibility:
As FFA is a rare disease, no formal power calculation was performed. Recruitment will continue for 12 months, aiming for a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm (50 total). This sample size is consistent with exploratory studies in rare conditions and is expected to generate meaningful preliminary evidence.
Statistical analysis:
Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Primary endpoint comparisons (change in FFASS from baseline to week 24) will be performed using independent-samples tests or non-parametric equivalents, as appropriate. Longitudinal changes will be analyzed with linear mixed-effects models to account for repeated measures and potential confounding factors (e.g., age, sex, disease duration, baseline severity). Because treatment allocation is preference-based rather than randomized, baseline characteristics will be carefully compared and adjusted for in multivariate analyses. Propensity score methods may be applied to further control for allocation bias. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed with similar mixed models or descriptive statistics, depending on variable type.
Data management and quality assurance:
Data will be collected and stored in the validated Castor EDC platform, with patient information pseudonymized. Photos and clinical data will be retained securely for a minimum of 10 years, in line with Erasmus MC guidelines and FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). Privacy and confidentiality will be strictly maintained, and access will be restricted to authorized research team members.
Risks and burden:
Both HCQ and MTX are well-established systemic treatments in dermatology, prescribed within their standard safety monitoring frameworks. The study does not require additional clinic visits beyond routine care. The only extra element is the completion of short questionnaires, taking approximately 5-15 minutes at specified visits. Risks are therefore considered negligible.
This study addresses an urgent knowledge gap in FFA by providing prospective, systematically collected real-world data on the effectiveness and tolerability of HCQ and MTX. The results are expected to inform future treatment guidelines and improve evidence-based care for this rare and burdensome condition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hydroxychloroquine group
Intervention: hydroxychloroquine
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)
400 mg orally once daily
Methotrexate group
Intervention: methotrexate
Methotrexate (MTX)
15 mg weekly, orally or subcutaneously (+ concomitant medication: Folic acid 10 mg once weekly, taken 24 hours after MTX)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)
400 mg orally once daily
Methotrexate (MTX)
15 mg weekly, orally or subcutaneously (+ concomitant medication: Folic acid 10 mg once weekly, taken 24 hours after MTX)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA)
* Willing and able to provide written informed consent
* Adequate understanding of the Dutch language
* No known contraindications or allergies to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or methotrexate (MTX)
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to adhere to the study protocol, including medication intake, clinic visits, and questionnaire completion.
* Patients who are ineligible for the HCQ arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the MTX arm.
Contraindications HCQ: retinopathy and/or maculopathy/myasthenia gravis/body weight less than 35 kg
\- Patients who are ineligible for the MTX arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the HCQ arm.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rick Waalboer-Spuij, MD, PhD
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmus MC University Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14475
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.