Evaluation of Guided Endodontic Microsurgery and Two Different Retrograde Filling Materials

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-20

Study Completion Date

2024-04-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of guided endodontic microsurgical root end resection on bone healing compared to nonguided microsurgery using two different retrograde filling material (Well root putty, MTA) by cone-beam computed tomography.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Guided Versus Conventional Periapical Endodontic Surgery

NCT04133181

Endodontic Disease Endodontic Re-treatment Failure

UNKNOWN NA

Regenerative Endodontics for Non-vital Primary Molars

NCT05098483

Pulp and Periapical Tissue Disease

COMPLETED NA

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars Using Protooth Vs. MTA

NCT04710160

Clinical Evaluation Including Pain and Swelling

UNKNOWN NA

MTA vs CEM Pulpotomy in Young Permanent Molars

NCT04243733

Irreversible Pulpitis

UNKNOWN NA

Effect of Different Root Canal Instruments on Removal of Endotoxins From Necrotic Root Canals

NCT03641612

Endodontic Disease

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endodontic Re-treatment Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

microsurgical apicoectomy without guide+MTA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MTA retrograde filling

Intervention Type DRUG

MTA retrograde filling

microsurgical apicoectomy without guide+well root putty ( premixed bioceramic putty) retrograde fil

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

well root putty ( premixed bioceramic putty) retrograde filling

Intervention Type DRUG

well root putty ( premixed bioceramic putty) retrograde filling

microsurgical apicoectomy with guide+MTA

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MTA retrograde filling

Intervention Type DRUG

MTA retrograde filling

microsurgical apicoectomy with guide+well root putty ( premixed bioceramic putty) retrograde fil

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

well root putty ( premixed bioceramic putty) retrograde filling

Intervention Type DRUG

well root putty ( premixed bioceramic putty) retrograde filling

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

well root putty ( premixed bioceramic putty) retrograde filling

Intervention Type DRUG

MTA retrograde filling

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Tooth is restorable pocket depth is less than 4mm and mobility in its normal limit ( less than 1mm)
* Persisting or emerging disease following root-canal treatment when root canal re-treatment is inappropriate.
* Tooth with acceptable endodontic treatment and have a new post and crown restoration, but have a persistent or enlarging periapical lesion ( size less than 10 mm)
* Obstructed canal (the obstruction proved not to be removable, by passed and the risk of damage was too great).
* Extruded material or instrument with clinical or radiological findings of apical periodontitis and/or symptoms are present.

Exclusion Criteria

* Non restorable tooth
* Contraindicating medical condition ( severe systemic condition and psychological condition)
* Anatomical contra indication
* Poor general oral status and supporting periodontal tissue.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No