Time to Ambulation After ProGlide Closure

NCT ID: NCT07179536

Last Updated: 2026-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transradial access has become the standard for coronary procedures due to fewer vascular complications and shorter bed rest, yet transfemoral access remains essential for complex peripheral interventions requiring larger sheaths and stronger support. Vascular closure devices (VCDs), particularly suture-mediated devices such as ProGlide, have improved femoral access by reducing hemostasis time, ambulation delay, and patient discomfort. Although early ambulation after ProGlide closure has been reported, current practice varies widely, and the relationship between ambulation timing and vascular complications remains unclear. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of different ambulation times after ProGlide closure in transfemoral peripheral angiography or intervention, with the goal of identifying the optimal time to ambulation that balances safety and efficiency.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Transradial access has replaced transfemoral access as the mainstream approach for coronary angiography and intervention due to its lower incidence of vascular complications and shorter postoperative bed rest. In non-coronary endovascular interventions, radial access is also an attractive alternative. However, the traditional femoral approach retains irreplaceable advantages: it is easier for puncture and sheath insertion, accommodates sheaths ≥ 8F, allows the delivery of larger stents, provides better guiding catheter support, and reduces procedural difficulty and time.

In recent years, the widespread use of vascular closure devices (VCDs) has further improved the physician and patient experience of femoral access. Compared with manual compression, VCDs significantly reduce hemostasis time, shorten postoperative bed rest, and improve patient comfort and satisfaction. VCDs can be classified into four categories based on the closure mechanism: collagen plug, suture-mediated, disc-based, and metal clip. Although comparative studies among different VCDs are limited, the efficacy and safety of suture-mediated VCDs have been well demonstrated. ProGlide, as a representative of suture-mediated VCDs, is favored for large sheath compatibility, reliable hemostasis, and low vascular complication rates.

Evidence from Aravind Sekhar et al. showed that patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography via femoral access could ambulate early after ProGlide closure, which is a key driver for reducing hospitalization time, lowering costs, and improving patient satisfaction. While previous studies have reported the benefit of VCDs in shortening time to ambulation, the determination of ambulation time was largely empirical, ranging from 2 to 12 hours depending on operator experience. Currently, there is a lack of evidence regarding the association between ambulation time and vascular complications at the access site. This study aims to investigate the impact of different ambulation times after ProGlide closure in patients undergoing transfemoral peripheral angiography or endovascular intervention on vascular access site complications, in order to determine the optimal timing for ambulation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Femoral Access Site Closure Ambulation Vascular Access Complication Vascular Access Site Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early Ambulation (2 hours)

Patients instructed to ambulate 2 hours after ProGlide femoral artery closure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ambulation after ProGlide Closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ambulation time after femoral artery access site closure using the ProGlide vascular closure device was assigned to 2 hours, 6 hours, or 12 hours post-procedure.

Intermediate Ambulation (6 hours)

Patients instructed to ambulate 6 hours after ProGlide femoral artery closure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ambulation after ProGlide Closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ambulation time after femoral artery access site closure using the ProGlide vascular closure device was assigned to 2 hours, 6 hours, or 12 hours post-procedure.

Late Ambulation (12 hours)

Patients instructed to ambulate 12 hours after femoral access site closure with ProGlide.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ambulation after ProGlide Closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ambulation time after femoral artery access site closure using the ProGlide vascular closure device was assigned to 2 hours, 6 hours, or 12 hours post-procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ambulation after ProGlide Closure

Ambulation time after femoral artery access site closure using the ProGlide vascular closure device was assigned to 2 hours, 6 hours, or 12 hours post-procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Scheduled for peripheral angiography or endovascular intervention via transfemoral access.
* Femoral artery puncture site located at the common femoral artery.
* Use of 6-8F vascular sheath.
* Hemostasis achieved with 6F ProGlide closure device (defined as no active bleeding, no hematoma formation, and no ischemia of the punctured limb after closure).
* Preoperative ankle-brachial index (ABI) \> 0.9 on both sides.
* Conscious, cooperative, and with normal lower limb mobility.

Exclusion Criteria

* Undergoing carotid artery intervention.
* Femoral artery diameter \< 5 mm, or effective lumen \< 5 mm due to plaque burden.
* History of vascular complications at the puncture site.
* Abnormal cardiopulmonary function.
* Intraoperative platelet count \< 80 × 10⁹/L, or use of thrombolytic agents.
* Cognitive impairment, uncooperative, or limited lower limb mobility.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hui DONG

professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hui Dong, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hui Dong, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-010-88322385

Xiongjing Jiang, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-010-88322387

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hui Dong, MD

Role: primary

86-010-88322385

Xiongjing Jiang, MD

Role: backup

86-010-88322387

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-0906

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.