Anthropometric Measurements on Size and Labour Outcomes
NCT ID: NCT07173452
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
153 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-01
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises Applied During Pregnancy on Genito-Pelvic Pain Level in Postpartum Period
NCT05343520
Effect of Using a Birth Ball on Birth Satisfaction and Pain in Pregnant Women During Labor
NCT05312502
The Effect of Birth Positions on Labor
NCT07243522
Effects of Digital Vaginal Examination During Labor on Pain and Anxiety Levels
NCT02599610
The Effect of Labour Hopscotch Based Midwifery Care in Labor
NCT06879405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate women's physical body measurements in relation to externally measurable pelvic dimensions, to examine the relationship between them, and to determine their impact on pain levels during labour, the duration of labour, and the mode of delivery.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2022 and June 2023 in the labour ward of a maternity hospital in Istanbul, involving 153 pregnant women. The sample was evenly divided into three groups, with 51 participants in each, and pelvic measurement assessments were recorded accordingly. In the first group, participants' physical body measurements were evaluated alongside pelvic dimensions measured via vaginal examination. In the second group, physical measurements were assessed together with external pelvic measurements. In the third group, physical body measurements were evaluated in conjunction with pelvic assessments obtained through transvaginal ultrasonographic measurements. The results obtained from the three groups were compared with one another. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and direct measurements performed by the researchers using the following instruments: a descriptive information form, physical examination measurement form, transvaginal ultrasonography measurement form, labour assessment form, postpartum and neonatal evaluation form, visual analogue scale for pain, external pelvic measurement form, and vaginal pelvic examination form.
Keywords: Physical Body Measurements, External Pelvic Measurements, Labour Pain, Duration of Labour, Mode of Delivery, Midwife
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
the first group
In the first group, participants' physical body measurements were evaluated alongside pelvic dimensions measured via vaginal examination.
vaginal examination
pelvic dimensions measured via vaginal examination.
physical body measurements
Anthrometric measurements of the participants were made
the second group
In the second group, physical measurements were assessed together with external pelvic measurements.
physical body measurements
Anthrometric measurements of the participants were made
the third group
In the third group, physical body measurements were evaluated in conjunction with pelvic assessments obtained through transvaginal ultrasonographic measurements.
physical body measurements
Anthrometric measurements of the participants were made
transvaginal ultrasonographic
intrapartum pelvic evaluations were performed by transvaginal ultrasonography
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
vaginal examination
pelvic dimensions measured via vaginal examination.
physical body measurements
Anthrometric measurements of the participants were made
transvaginal ultrasonographic
intrapartum pelvic evaluations were performed by transvaginal ultrasonography
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The onset of labour,
* Being between 37-42 weeks of gestation,
* To be able to speak and understand Turkish,
* 18 years of age or older,
* No history of a disease affecting bone anatomy
Exclusion Criteria
* Planned caesarean sections
* Multiparous pregnant women
* History of pelvic trauma, disease, previous pelvic surgeries.
18 Years
49 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
OTHER
Uskudar University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tuğba YILMAZ ESENCAN
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
TUĞBA YILMAZ ESENCAN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
TC Üsküdar Üniversitesi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uskudar Univercity
Istanbul, Ümraniye, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Benjamin SJ, Daniel AB, Kamath A, Ramkumar V. Anthropometric measurements as predictors of cephalopelvic disproportion: Can the diagnostic accuracy be improved? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Jan;91(1):122-127. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01267.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Anthropometric measurements as predictors of cephalopelvic disproportion: Can the diagnostic accuracy be improved?
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023/06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.