Pulmonary Function, Muscle Strength, and Functional Capacity in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07172529
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-01
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does minimally invasive cardiac surgery preserve pulmonary function better than conventional sternotomy? Does minimally invasive cardiac surgery result in less respiratory and peripheral muscle weakness compared to conventional sternotomy? Researchers will compare patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery with those undergoing conventional sternotomy to determine differences in pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, peripheral muscle strength, and functional capacity.
Participants will:
Undergo preoperative and postoperative (day 4) assessments including spirometry, inspiratory/expiratory mouth pressure measurements, and peripheral muscle strength testing (handgrip, shoulder flexion/abduction, hip flexion, knee extension).
Perform functional capacity tests (30-second sit-to-stand test, 6-minute walk test).
Complete questionnaires assessing pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire) and fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Evaluation After Cardiac Surgery
NCT05932368
Evaluation of Fluid Responsiveness With Recruitment Maneuver After Sternotomy in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
NCT06249568
Intraoperative Mechanical Power and Ventilation-Associated Lung Injury: Assessing Complications
NCT06375980
Effectıvenes Of Frail Scale And Daily Lıfe Activity Assesment For Major Abdominal Surgery Patients
NCT06182228
Comparison of Airway Management With Bronchial Blocker and Double-Lumen Tube in Single-Lung Ventilation
NCT06299735
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Postoperative pulmonary complications are a significant concern in cardiac surgery. Procedures involving cardiopulmonary bypass may result in atelectasis, pneumonia, pleural effusion, phrenic nerve injury, and diaphragm dysfunction. These complications can impair respiratory mechanics, delay rehabilitation, and increase morbidity and mortality. Therefore, identifying surgical approaches that better preserve pulmonary and muscular function is of great clinical importance.
This observational study will prospectively evaluate adult patients undergoing CABG at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, comparing two groups: those receiving minimally invasive cardiac surgery via mini-thoracotomy and those undergoing conventional sternotomy. The primary outcomes are changes in pulmonary function parameters measured by spirometry (FVC, FEV1, PEF) from baseline to postoperative day 4. Secondary outcomes include respiratory muscle strength (MIP, MEP), peripheral muscle strength (handgrip, shoulder flexion/abduction, hip flexion, knee extension), functional capacity (30-second sit-to-stand test, 6-minute walk test), pain intensity (McGill Pain Questionnaire), and fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia).
All assessments will be performed twice: before surgery (preoperative baseline) and on postoperative day 4. This time frame was chosen to capture early postoperative functional changes, which may influence short-term recovery and rehabilitation strategies. By comparing the two surgical techniques, this study aims to determine whether minimally invasive cardiac surgery provides better preservation of pulmonary and muscular function, ultimately supporting improved patient-centered outcomes and guiding clinical decision-making in surgical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for elective cardiac surgery via either minimally invasive approach (mini-thoracotomy) or conventional sternotomy at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital
* Able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of orthopedic or neurological disorders affecting mobility or muscle strength
* Postoperative cerebrovascular event
* Requirement for mechanical ventilation \> 24 hours postoperatively
* Intensive care unit stay \> 48 hours
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zehra Can Karahan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zehra Can Karahan
Asst. Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zehra Can Karahan, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Atılım University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Atilim University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3dcd45b218264a9a
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.