Pulmonary Function, Muscle Strength, and Functional Capacity in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07172529

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-01

Study Completion Date

2025-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, peripheral muscle strength, and functional capacity in adult patients undergoing either minimally invasive cardiac surgery (via mini-thoracotomy) or conventional sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital.The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does minimally invasive cardiac surgery preserve pulmonary function better than conventional sternotomy? Does minimally invasive cardiac surgery result in less respiratory and peripheral muscle weakness compared to conventional sternotomy? Researchers will compare patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery with those undergoing conventional sternotomy to determine differences in pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, peripheral muscle strength, and functional capacity.

Participants will:

Undergo preoperative and postoperative (day 4) assessments including spirometry, inspiratory/expiratory mouth pressure measurements, and peripheral muscle strength testing (handgrip, shoulder flexion/abduction, hip flexion, knee extension).

Perform functional capacity tests (30-second sit-to-stand test, 6-minute walk test).

Complete questionnaires assessing pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire) and fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for patients with complex coronary artery disease. While the standard approach is through median sternotomy, minimally invasive cardiac surgery performed via mini-thoracotomy has gained popularity due to potential benefits such as smaller incisions, reduced surgical trauma, lower risk of sternal complications, shorter hospital stays, and faster mobilization. However, its effects on pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, peripheral muscle strength, and functional capacity have not been sufficiently clarified.

Postoperative pulmonary complications are a significant concern in cardiac surgery. Procedures involving cardiopulmonary bypass may result in atelectasis, pneumonia, pleural effusion, phrenic nerve injury, and diaphragm dysfunction. These complications can impair respiratory mechanics, delay rehabilitation, and increase morbidity and mortality. Therefore, identifying surgical approaches that better preserve pulmonary and muscular function is of great clinical importance.

This observational study will prospectively evaluate adult patients undergoing CABG at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, comparing two groups: those receiving minimally invasive cardiac surgery via mini-thoracotomy and those undergoing conventional sternotomy. The primary outcomes are changes in pulmonary function parameters measured by spirometry (FVC, FEV1, PEF) from baseline to postoperative day 4. Secondary outcomes include respiratory muscle strength (MIP, MEP), peripheral muscle strength (handgrip, shoulder flexion/abduction, hip flexion, knee extension), functional capacity (30-second sit-to-stand test, 6-minute walk test), pain intensity (McGill Pain Questionnaire), and fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia).

All assessments will be performed twice: before surgery (preoperative baseline) and on postoperative day 4. This time frame was chosen to capture early postoperative functional changes, which may influence short-term recovery and rehabilitation strategies. By comparing the two surgical techniques, this study aims to determine whether minimally invasive cardiac surgery provides better preservation of pulmonary and muscular function, ultimately supporting improved patient-centered outcomes and guiding clinical decision-making in surgical practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Surgery Muscle Weakness | Patient Pulmonary Function Functional Capacity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 18-80 years
* Scheduled for elective cardiac surgery via either minimally invasive approach (mini-thoracotomy) or conventional sternotomy at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital
* Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous history of cardiac surgery
* Presence of orthopedic or neurological disorders affecting mobility or muscle strength
* Postoperative cerebrovascular event
* Requirement for mechanical ventilation \> 24 hours postoperatively
* Intensive care unit stay \> 48 hours
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zehra Can Karahan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zehra Can Karahan

Asst. Prof.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zehra Can Karahan, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Atılım University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Atilim University

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3dcd45b218264a9a

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.