Comparing Low-Level Laser and Muscle Energy Techniques in Diabetic Frozen Shoulder

NCT ID: NCT07161622

Last Updated: 2025-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-31

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current study is to evaluate the comparative effects of low-level laser therapy and muscle energy technique on pain, range of motion, and functional results in diabetic patients with frozen shoulder. This research aims to enhance the existing data on managing diabetes-related musculoskeletal issues by assessing the comparative advantages of various therapies, therefore assisting physicians in choosing appropriate, patient-centred rehabilitation procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Frozen Shoulder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) + Conventional Therapy

Participants received LLLT with a Ga-Al-As diode laser (830 nm, 100 mW) applied to anterior capsule, posterior capsule, and subacromial area (4 J/cm² per site, 60-90 sec each), three times per week for 8 weeks. Along with LLLT, all participants received conventional therapy (moist heat, pendulum exercises, passive/active-assisted ROM, isometric strengthening, and postural correction training).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants received LLLT using a gallium-aluminium-arsenide (Ga-Al-As) diode laser device (BTL-5000, UK). The laser operated at a wavelength of 830 nm and a power output of 100 mW. Irradiation was applied at three sites (anterior capsule, posterior capsule, subacromial area) using a stationary-contact technique for 60-90 seconds each, delivering 4 J/cm² per site. Sessions were administered three times weekly for eight weeks.

Conventional Therapy (for both groups):

15 minutes of moist heat (Chattanooga Hydrocollator)

Pendulum exercises

Passive and active-assisted ROM exercises

Isometric strengthening of rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers

Postural correction training

Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants received MET for major shoulder muscles (internal/external rotators, flexors, extensors). Each contraction was performed at \~20% of maximum effort, sustained for 10 seconds, followed by 5 seconds relaxation, and then passive stretch to new end range. Three to five cycles per muscle group were performed. Sessions lasted \~20 minutes, three times weekly for eight weeks.

Conventional Therapy (same as Arm A):

15 minutes of moist heat

Pendulum exercises

Passive and active-assisted ROM exercises

Isometric strengthening of rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers

Postural correction training

Muscle Energy Technique (MET) + Conventional Therapy

Participants received MET for shoulder muscle groups (internal/external rotators, flexors, extensors). Each contraction was \~20% effort, held for 10 sec, followed by 5 sec relaxation and passive stretch to a new end range. Three to five cycles per group, \~20 minutes/session, three times per week for 8 weeks. Along with MET, all participants received the same conventional therapy as Arm A.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants received LLLT using a gallium-aluminium-arsenide (Ga-Al-As) diode laser device (BTL-5000, UK). The laser operated at a wavelength of 830 nm and a power output of 100 mW. Irradiation was applied at three sites (anterior capsule, posterior capsule, subacromial area) using a stationary-contact technique for 60-90 seconds each, delivering 4 J/cm² per site. Sessions were administered three times weekly for eight weeks.

Conventional Therapy (for both groups):

15 minutes of moist heat (Chattanooga Hydrocollator)

Pendulum exercises

Passive and active-assisted ROM exercises

Isometric strengthening of rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers

Postural correction training

Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants received MET for major shoulder muscles (internal/external rotators, flexors, extensors). Each contraction was performed at \~20% of maximum effort, sustained for 10 seconds, followed by 5 seconds relaxation, and then passive stretch to new end range. Three to five cycles per muscle group were performed. Sessions lasted \~20 minutes, three times weekly for eight weeks.

Conventional Therapy (same as Arm A):

15 minutes of moist heat

Pendulum exercises

Passive and active-assisted ROM exercises

Isometric strengthening of rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers

Postural correction training

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)

Participants received LLLT using a gallium-aluminium-arsenide (Ga-Al-As) diode laser device (BTL-5000, UK). The laser operated at a wavelength of 830 nm and a power output of 100 mW. Irradiation was applied at three sites (anterior capsule, posterior capsule, subacromial area) using a stationary-contact technique for 60-90 seconds each, delivering 4 J/cm² per site. Sessions were administered three times weekly for eight weeks.

Conventional Therapy (for both groups):

15 minutes of moist heat (Chattanooga Hydrocollator)

Pendulum exercises

Passive and active-assisted ROM exercises

Isometric strengthening of rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers

Postural correction training

Intervention Type OTHER

Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

Participants received MET for major shoulder muscles (internal/external rotators, flexors, extensors). Each contraction was performed at \~20% of maximum effort, sustained for 10 seconds, followed by 5 seconds relaxation, and then passive stretch to new end range. Three to five cycles per muscle group were performed. Sessions lasted \~20 minutes, three times weekly for eight weeks.

Conventional Therapy (same as Arm A):

15 minutes of moist heat

Pendulum exercises

Passive and active-assisted ROM exercises

Isometric strengthening of rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers

Postural correction training

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible participants were male and female individuals aged 18 to 65 years with a verified diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and clinical manifestations of frozen shoulder for at least three months. The diagnosis was determined by limited glenohumeral joint mobility, characterised by a decrease of ≥20° in a minimum of three active movements: flexion \<144°, abduction \<120°, and external rotation \<72°. Cases of both unilateral and bilateral nature were incorporated.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Lahore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aqsa Majeed

Dr. Aqsa Majeed

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Zunaira

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.