Early Radiotherapy Versus Observation for High-risk Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Bone Metastases
NCT ID: NCT07146074
Last Updated: 2026-01-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-05
2029-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* Can preventive radiation of high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases (and observation or medication) decrease the number of skeletal related events (i.e. bone complications due to bone metastases) in patients with metastatic cancer?
* Can preventive radiation of high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases (and observation or medication) decrease the need for hospitalization related to such bone metastases, improve overall survival and (health-related) quality of life?
* What are the side effects of preventive radiation of high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases?
Researchers will compare 2 treatment groups in order to answer the questions listed above: 1 group treated with medication or observation alone (group A) and 1 group treated with medication or observation and preventive radiotherapy (group B).
Participants will
* be screened to assess whether they are eligible to participate in the study.
* be randomized (i.e. drawn) into the 2 treatment groups mentioned above.
* be treated with preventive radiotherapy if they were drawn in treatment group B.
* need to attend follow-up visits (may be via teleconsultation) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after date of randomization during which safety and efficacy is monitored. During these follow-up visits, the general health condition of the participant is evaluated, the occurrence of any bone complication, the medications taken by the participant are registered, the degree of pain and location of the high-risk bone metastases are determined and possible side effects are registered. Furthermore, the participant needs to complete 2 questionnaires at each visit regarding his/her quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Radiation Therapy to Usual Care for Patients With High-Risk Bone Asymptomatic Metastases, PREEMPT Trial
NCT06745024
A Multi-Center Observational Trial of Symptomatic, High-Risk Bone Metastases Treated with Percutaneous Ablation and Palliative Radiation Therapy
NCT06859801
A Trial to Improve Quality of Life With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
NCT03831243
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Comprehensive Treatment of 4-10 Oligometastatic Tumors
NCT03721341
Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Bone Metastases From Breast or Prostate Cancer
NCT00003162
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
SSEs are defined as:
* symptomatic pathological fracture
* spinal cord compression leading to neurological deficit or pain
* Indication for palliative radiotherapy (for bone pain, cord compression or (impending) fracture)
* Indication for orthopedic surgery (for bone pain, cord compression or (impending) fracture)
When SSE occur that have a negative impact on the quality of life, these can be treated with systemic therapy, surgery or radiotherapy (RT). Scientific evidence is already available for radiotherapy as an effective treatment for patients with bone metastases causing symptoms. Recent data from an American trial suggest that also preventive radiotherapy of high-risk asymptomatic bone metastases may have a favorable effect. Hence, the aim of the HERMES study is to investigate if early preventive radiation of high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases in patients with metastatic cancer can decrease the number of symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) in a multi-centric randomized phase 3 trial.
A potential participant needs to sign an informed consent form before participating in the HERMES study. Participation in the HERMES study will comprise a screening period, during which the screening assessments must be completed, a treatment phase and a follow-up phase.
During the screening phase, eligibility of the patient to participate in the study will be assessed. Demographics data, Karnofsky performance score, information regarding medical history, prior medications and adverse events will be recorded. Moreover, the potential participant needs to complete questionnaires regarding his/her quality of life, characteristics of the high-risk metastases will be recorded based on imaging and a pain score will be determined for each lesion.
Eligible, consenting subjects will then be randomized (1:1) into one of two treatment arms: an observational arm (arm A) receiving systemic therapy / observation or an upfront RT arm (arm B) receiving upfront RT plus systemic therapy / observation.
During the treatment phase, RT should take place within 21 days after date of randomization for subjects in arm B. Participants of both study arms receive either systemic therapy or observation, according to the standard of care guidelines.
The follow-up phase consists of 6 follow-up visits which will take place at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after date of randomization and during which safety and efficacy are monitored. More specifically, the Karnofsky performance score, concomitant medications and adverse events will be recorded at each visit. Moreover, the potential participant needs to complete questionnaires regarding his/her quality of life. Note that patients in arm B are strongly advised to receive additional preventive radiotherapy in case of appearance of new asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk bone metastases during follow-up. A maximum of 5 high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases can be irradiated at once.
In case an SSE would occur, the assessments that should take place during the next follow-up visit, should be completed at that time point, preferably within one week. Afterwards, only survival data will be recorded on the planned FU visits until 24 months after the randomization date as well as possible occurrence of another SSE and hospitalizations related to the high-risk bone metastasis(es) until 24 months after the randomization date.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A: observational arm
Patients in arm A will receive either systemic therapy or observation.
Systemic therapy (Standard of Care)/Observation
It concerns systemic therapy if applicable according to the standard of care or only observation.
Arm B: upfront radiotherapy arm
Patients in arm B will receive preventive (upfront) radiotherapy in addition to either systemic therapy or observation.
Preventive radiotherapy
Either conventional radiotherapy (single dose of 8 Gy) or Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation (either 1x20 Gy, 2x12 Gy, 3x10 Gy or 5x8 Gy) will be delivered depending on the participant's prognostic outcome.
Systemic therapy (Standard of Care)/Observation
It concerns systemic therapy if applicable according to the standard of care or only observation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Preventive radiotherapy
Either conventional radiotherapy (single dose of 8 Gy) or Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation (either 1x20 Gy, 2x12 Gy, 3x10 Gy or 5x8 Gy) will be delivered depending on the participant's prognostic outcome.
Systemic therapy (Standard of Care)/Observation
It concerns systemic therapy if applicable according to the standard of care or only observation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* I2: High-risk bone metastasis(es) that is (are) asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic:
\*Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic is defined as follows: O Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) score ≤2 for the specific lesion(s)
\*High-risk is defined as follows (i.e. at least one of the following points must be applicable): O Bulky site of disease in bone (diameter ≥ 2 cm) O Disease involving the hip (acetabulum, femoral head, femoral neck), shoulder (acromion, glenoid, humeral head), or sacroiliac joints O Disease in long bones with cortical involvement of \>1/3 in proportion to the diameter of the bone (humerus, radius, ulna, clavicle, femur, tibia, fibula, metacarpals, phalanges) O Disease in vertebrae of the junctional spine (C1-2, C7- T1, T12-L1, L5-S1) and/or disease with posterior element involvement or epidural extension (Bilsky epidural compression score 1a-3) \[Bilsky et al\]. The posterior elements of the spine consist of the pedicles, laminae, facets (articular processes), transverse processes, and the spinous process.
* I3: Number of Risk Factors (NRF) prognostic score 0-2
* I4: Age ≥ 18 years
* I5: Ability to provide informed consent (either by the patient or by a legally authorized representative)
* I6: A female participant is eligible to participate if she confirms not to be pregnant at screening, and one of the following conditions applies:
Is not a woman of child bearing potential or A woman of child bearing potential must confirm that she is not pregnant at screening and must agree to use a very effective method of birth control
Exclusion Criteria
* E2: NRF prognostic score 3
* E3: Serious medical co-morbidities that preclude radiotherapy
* E4: Bone lesion complicated with a pathological fracture or impending pathologic fracture for which prophylactic stabilization is recommended, characterized by Mirels score of ≥9 \[Mirels et al\].
* E5: Spinal metastasis with SINS score \>13 requiring upfront neurosurgical stabilization \[Fourney et al\].
* E6: More than 5 high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic bone locations
* E7: Patient already included in another clinical trial that would interfere with the HERMES clinical trial, as assessed by the Investigator.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kom Op Tegen Kanker
OTHER
Cancer Research Antwerp
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charlotte Billiet, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ZAS Augustinus
Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
AZORG
Aalst, , Belgium
UZ Gent
Ghent, , Belgium
Jessa Ziekenhuis
Hasselt, , Belgium
AZ Groeninge
Kortrijk, , Belgium
UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg
Leuven, , Belgium
AZ Delta
Roeselare, , Belgium
AZ Turnhout
Turnhout, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Samuel Bral
Role: primary
Yolande Lievens
Role: primary
Katleen Verboven
Role: primary
Nora Sundahl
Role: primary
Eva Oldenburger
Role: primary
Caroline Sweldens
Role: primary
Stéphanie Smet
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CTO23032GZA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.