Combined Lactulose H2-breath Test With Abdominal Imaging
NCT ID: NCT07145580
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-08-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is important to distinguish between carbohydrate intolerance and SIBO because their treatments differ significantly. Carbohydrate intolerance is typically managed through dietary restrictions, while SIBO requires antibiotic therapy. However, recent guidelines have questioned the accuracy of hydrogen breath tests in diagnosing SIBO due to variability in OCTT measurements. This limitation can be addressed by combining H₂ breath tests with imaging techniques such as scintigraphy, which independently confirm OCTT. When this combined approach is used, SIBO is diagnosed if the rise in breath H₂ occurs before the contrast agent appears in the large bowel. Despite its benefits, this combined method faces organizational and financial challenges that limit its routine clinical use.
This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the clinical performance of a cheap and simple test that combines a 20g lactulose H₂ breath test with simple radiographic abdominal imaging to assess OCTT, SIBO, and carbohydrate tolerance. The novel innovation in this method is to confirm oro-caecal transit by taking an X-ray of the abdomen when H₂ production increases during the examination. If the contrast agent is not visible in the cecum when H₂ rises, this indicates the presence of SIBO. Conversely, if the contrast agent is present in the cecum at that time, it confirms normal OCTT, and any abdominal symptoms occurring after this point support a diagnosis of carbohydrate intolerance.
If the method is proven to be valid, then this simple test will greatly facilitate the accurate diagnosis of SIBO and carbohydrate intolerance, allowing for more appropriate treatment decisions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hydrogen and Methane Breath Test Questionnaire
NCT05122520
MSOT for Assessment of Intestinal Transit Time in Lactose Intolerance Patients
NCT06617364
Methane and Hydrogen Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
NCT06483360
Measurement and Analysis of Gas Composition in Digestive Tract
NCT05810805
Clinical Characteristics of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Individuals with Abdominal Distention
NCT06285734
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several substrates have been used in H2 breath tests. The aims of these tests include (I) detection of carbohydrate malabsorption of lactose and fructose and other substrates that are variably absorbed in the small bowel, (II) measurement of the time interval between ingestion of an unabsorbable carbohydrate, such as lactulose, and its contact with colonic bacteria in the cecum (oro-cecal transit time, OCTT), and (III) association of H2 gas production with onset of abdominal symptoms like bloating, flatulence, abdominal pain and diarrhea, i.e. carbohydrate intolerance (IV) diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) by an "early rise" (e.g.; \<90 minutes) in H2 after ingestion of a test substance (e.g. glucose or lactulose), due to abnormally high concentrations of bacteria in the small intestine.
The distinction between carbohydrate intolerance and SIBO is important because treatment of the two conditions is different. The former is most often managed by dietary restriction, whereas the latter is treated by antibiotics. Recent guidelines and editorials have questioned the accuracy of H2 breath tests in the detection of SIBO primarily due to high variation in measurements of OCTT. In particular, rapid OCTT leading to an early rise in H2 after ingestion of a substrate can lead to a false positive diagnosis of SIBO and treatment with inappropriate medication. This limitation can be addressed by combining H2 breath tests with scintigraphic imaging that provides an independent assessment of OCTT. When this methodology is applied, SIBO is diagnosed when there is an increase in breath H2 before scintigraphic contrast appears in the large bowel. However, there are important organizational and financial barriers to implementation of this approach in routine clinical practice.
This retrospective cohort study reports the performance of a cheap and simple test that combines a 20g lactulose H2 breath test with radiographic abdominal imaging to assess OCTT, SIBO, and carbohydrate tolerance. The novel innovation in this method is to confirm oro-caecal transit by taking an X-ray of the abdomen when H2 production increases during the examination. If contrast agent is NOT visible in the caecum when H2 increases, then SIBO is present. Otherwise, if contrast agent is present in the caecum, then results confirm OCTT and the occurrence of abdominal symptoms after this time is consistent with the diagnosis of carbohydrate intolerance.
The rationale of using 20g lactulose in this investigation is based on the results of a series of studies from the principle investigator and others that showed (i) H2 breath test results after ingestion of 20g lactulose are statistically not different to those after ingestion of 20g lactose in a patient with lactase deficiency. (ii) The 20g lactulose nutrient challenge test can identify patients with carbohydrate intolerance (i.e. lactulose is a representative FODMAP) especially in patients with visceral hypersensitivity, a common feature of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). (iii) a dose response relationship between the amount of substrate ingested and the likelihood of symptoms occurring in health and disease, with IBS patients statistically significantly more likely to have symptoms after ingestion of 20g indigestible carbohydrate compared to healthy controls (OR \>3). (iv) pilot data that suggests patients with SIBO identified using combined 20g lactulose H2 breath test with abdominal imaging have more severe symptoms than patients with food intolerance without SIBO and also report an improvement in abdominal symptoms after treatment with a non-absorbable antibiotic (rifaximin) which does not occur in patients without SIBO.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients referred for hydrogen breath testing
Adult patients referred for hydrogen breath testing between 2020 and 2024 were included in this cohort. All patients included in the analysis signed general consent for the use of anonymized clinical data in studies. Indications for investigation included assessment of causes of digestive symptoms or maldigestion. Patients had laboratory and other imaging or endoscopic investigations that showed no evidence of organic pathology.
This retrospective cohort study reports the performance of a combined 20g lactulose H2 breath test with radiographic abdominal imaging to assess OCTT, SIBO, and carbohydrate tolerance. The novel innovation in this method is to confirm OCTT by taking an X-ray of the abdomen when H2 production increases during the examination. If contrast agent is NOT visible in the caecum when H2 increases, then SIBO is present. Otherwise, if contrast agent is present in the caecum, then results confirm OCTT and carbohydrate intolerance.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients signed general consent to allow use of clinical data obtained during clinical assessment and breath testing to be used in research project.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kantonsspital Baselland Bruderholz
OTHER
Klinik Arlesheim
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinik Arlesheim
Arlesheim, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KlinikArlesheim
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.