Online Access to Clinical Treatment Notes for Outpatients

NCT ID: NCT07135726

Last Updated: 2025-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1092 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-01

Study Completion Date

2028-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigates the feasibility and impact of patient access to clinical notes written by their healthcare providers-a concept known as Open Notes. While international research has already demonstrated positive effects of Open Notes on patient empowerment and treatment outcomes, there is a lack of corresponding evidence for the German healthcare context. The quasi-experimental study therefore combines quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate the effects of Open Notes on patient-reported outcomes as well as clinical practice.

The study is structured into five modules, each addressing specific research questions:

Module A - Summative Outcome Evaluation in Patients: Does the use of Open Notes lead to a significant increase in patient-reported outcomes such as empowerment and self-efficacy? Module B - Formative Process Evaluation with Stakeholders: What experiences do patients, relatives and clinicians have with Open Notes and what challenges and barriers arise in their use? Module C - Changes in Clinical Documentation: How do language style and content of clinical notes change when they are shared with patients as Open Notes? Module D - Optimization through Artificial Intelligence: Can clinical notes be processed using artificial intelligence in a way that makes them easier for patients to understand compared to conventional medical documentation? Module E - Integration into National Data Infrastructure: What technical, organizational and legal requirements must be met to successfully integrate Open Notes into the national telematics infrastructure and the electronic health record or routine care? The overall goal is to identify both patient-related outcomes and structural conditions for the sustainable implementation of Open Notes in the German healthcare system. The use of artificial intelligence is intended to further enhance patient-centeredness while reducing the burden on clinical staff.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mental Disorders Chronic Disease Primary Health Care Outpatients Internal Medicine Aged Comorbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Shared Notes Access

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Patient Portal-Based Access to Clinical Notes

Intervention Type DEVICE

An intra-individual comparison of patient-reported outcomes is planned for the intervention group. For this purpose, the pre-intervention survey of the intervention group is conducted upon inclusion in the study, the post-intervention survey at the earliest after the intervention has been used once (accessing their open note). Due to potential selection bias of the intervention group, which occurs due to voluntary participation in the intervention, a control group is surveyed at t0, which does not participate in the intervention, so that an adjustment for the systematic differences, if any, between the intervention and control group is possible at t0. The survey of a post-intervention control group (t1) serves to adjust for any time-varying effects so that a general time effect can be ruled out.

No Notes Access

Due to potential selection bias of the intervention group, which occurs due to voluntary participation in the intervention, a control group is surveyed at t0, which does not participate in the intervention, so that an adjustment for the systematic differences, if any, between the intervention and control group is possible at t0. The survey of a post-intervention control group (t1) serves to adjust for any time-varying effects so that a general time effect can be ruled out.

n=91 patients with a pre-intervention and a post-intervention control group of n=91 patients

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patient Portal-Based Access to Clinical Notes

An intra-individual comparison of patient-reported outcomes is planned for the intervention group. For this purpose, the pre-intervention survey of the intervention group is conducted upon inclusion in the study, the post-intervention survey at the earliest after the intervention has been used once (accessing their open note). Due to potential selection bias of the intervention group, which occurs due to voluntary participation in the intervention, a control group is surveyed at t0, which does not participate in the intervention, so that an adjustment for the systematic differences, if any, between the intervention and control group is possible at t0. The survey of a post-intervention control group (t1) serves to adjust for any time-varying effects so that a general time effect can be ruled out.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients (General, Module A \& D):

* Aged 18 years or older
* Outpatient treatment at one of the four study centers
* For intervention group: access to an internet-enabled device (e.g. smartphone, tablet, computer) and ability to receive text messages

For Module D:

* Experience with the respective disease or medical field (e.g. via prior treatment experience or basic medical understanding)
* At least one documented clinical treatment in the internal system of a participating center within the 12 months prior to intervention start
* Availability of clinically relevant treatment notes (e.g. physician letters, progress notes, discharge summaries, consultation notes) suitable for anonymized analysis

Patients (Control Group - Module A):

•No requirement for access to an internet-enabled device

Healthcare Practitioners (Modules A \& D):

* Aged 18 years or older
* Employed at one of the study centers
* Ability to give informed consent
* For Module D: experience in relevant clinical field and familiarity with medical terminology and treatment standards

Relatives (Module B):

* Aged 18 years or older
* Ability to give informed consent
* Identified as family member, friend, or legal representative of a participating patient

Experts (Module E):

* Demonstrated expertise or professional experience in digital health Relevant experience with telematics infrastructure (TI), HL7 FHIR®, ePA, KIM, TIM, or affiliation with relevant institutions (e.g. gematik GmbH, HL7 Deutschland e.V., mio42 GmbH)
* Participation in or co-design of health IT interoperability projects

Patients and Physicians (Module E):

* Good proficiency in German (workshops conducted in German)
* Basic digital literacy and experience with digital technologies in healthcare

Exclusion Criteria

General:

* Insufficient German language skills
* Severe organic brain disorders with cognitive impairment
* Intellectual disability
* Acute self-endangerment or danger to others at time of inclusion
* Lack of capacity to provide informed consent
* Lack of access to an internet-enabled device and inability to receive text messages (except in control group of Module A)

Module D:

* Clinical notes that cannot be anonymized due to legal, ethical, or technical restrictions
* Presence of rare diagnoses or unique treatment histories that hinder effective anonymization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universität zu Köln

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Technische Hochschule Brandenburg

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Julian Schwarz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Julian Schwarz

Julian Schwarz, MD Specialist in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Research Associate Mental Health Policy & Digitization Research Group

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Florian Wurster, M.Sc. Health Services Research

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Cologne

Eva Meier-Diedrich, M.Sc. Psychology

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Medical School Brandenburg

Julian Schwarz, MD, Specialist in Psychiatry

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical School Brandenburg

Ute Karbach, Priv.-Doz. Dr. rer. pol.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Cologne

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Julian Schwarz, MD, Specialist in Psychiatry

Role: CONTACT

+ 49 33638 83 501

Eva Meier-Diedrich, M.Sc. Psychology

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19879711 (View on PubMed)

Johnson MO, Rose CD, Dilworth SE, Neilands TB. Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of Health Care Empowerment: development and validation of the Health Care Empowerment inventory. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045692. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23029184 (View on PubMed)

Wurster, Florian, Eva Meier-Diedrich, I. Demirer, Catherine DesRoches, Nina Goldberg, Maria Hägglund, C. Herrmann, U. Karbach, A. Purohit, T. Schrader, J. Schwarz, 2024. "Online-Zugang Zu Klinischen Behandlungsnotizen Für Ambulant Versorgte Patienten (Studienprotokoll Zur OpenNOTES-Studie)." Nervenheilkunde, 43(12), 714-719.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.opennotes.info/en/

General information about the concept of open notes itself and the OpenNOTES-study

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

271012025-BO-E

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Improving Patient-centered Care Using an Inventory
NCT01843803 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Ostrobothnia Digital Clinic Experiment
NCT06904469 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Assessing Open Access Audio
NCT04452331 COMPLETED NA