Online Access to Clinical Treatment Notes for Outpatients
NCT ID: NCT07135726
Last Updated: 2025-08-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
1092 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-01
2028-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study is structured into five modules, each addressing specific research questions:
Module A - Summative Outcome Evaluation in Patients: Does the use of Open Notes lead to a significant increase in patient-reported outcomes such as empowerment and self-efficacy? Module B - Formative Process Evaluation with Stakeholders: What experiences do patients, relatives and clinicians have with Open Notes and what challenges and barriers arise in their use? Module C - Changes in Clinical Documentation: How do language style and content of clinical notes change when they are shared with patients as Open Notes? Module D - Optimization through Artificial Intelligence: Can clinical notes be processed using artificial intelligence in a way that makes them easier for patients to understand compared to conventional medical documentation? Module E - Integration into National Data Infrastructure: What technical, organizational and legal requirements must be met to successfully integrate Open Notes into the national telematics infrastructure and the electronic health record or routine care? The overall goal is to identify both patient-related outcomes and structural conditions for the sustainable implementation of Open Notes in the German healthcare system. The use of artificial intelligence is intended to further enhance patient-centeredness while reducing the burden on clinical staff.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to the Impact of Accuracy Problem Lists in Electronic Health Records on Correctness and Speed of Clinical Decision-making Performed by Dutch Healthcare Providers
NCT05657002
My Health - My Medication. Patient Involvement in Administration of Medication
NCT02894814
The Usefulness of Patients Receiving Their Own Letter After an Outpatient Attendance
NCT00129636
The Effect of Informative Letters on the Prescription and Receipt of Seroquel
NCT02467933
Thinking Outside the Box
NCT04713215
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Shared Notes Access
Patient Portal-Based Access to Clinical Notes
An intra-individual comparison of patient-reported outcomes is planned for the intervention group. For this purpose, the pre-intervention survey of the intervention group is conducted upon inclusion in the study, the post-intervention survey at the earliest after the intervention has been used once (accessing their open note). Due to potential selection bias of the intervention group, which occurs due to voluntary participation in the intervention, a control group is surveyed at t0, which does not participate in the intervention, so that an adjustment for the systematic differences, if any, between the intervention and control group is possible at t0. The survey of a post-intervention control group (t1) serves to adjust for any time-varying effects so that a general time effect can be ruled out.
No Notes Access
Due to potential selection bias of the intervention group, which occurs due to voluntary participation in the intervention, a control group is surveyed at t0, which does not participate in the intervention, so that an adjustment for the systematic differences, if any, between the intervention and control group is possible at t0. The survey of a post-intervention control group (t1) serves to adjust for any time-varying effects so that a general time effect can be ruled out.
n=91 patients with a pre-intervention and a post-intervention control group of n=91 patients
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Portal-Based Access to Clinical Notes
An intra-individual comparison of patient-reported outcomes is planned for the intervention group. For this purpose, the pre-intervention survey of the intervention group is conducted upon inclusion in the study, the post-intervention survey at the earliest after the intervention has been used once (accessing their open note). Due to potential selection bias of the intervention group, which occurs due to voluntary participation in the intervention, a control group is surveyed at t0, which does not participate in the intervention, so that an adjustment for the systematic differences, if any, between the intervention and control group is possible at t0. The survey of a post-intervention control group (t1) serves to adjust for any time-varying effects so that a general time effect can be ruled out.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 18 years or older
* Outpatient treatment at one of the four study centers
* For intervention group: access to an internet-enabled device (e.g. smartphone, tablet, computer) and ability to receive text messages
For Module D:
* Experience with the respective disease or medical field (e.g. via prior treatment experience or basic medical understanding)
* At least one documented clinical treatment in the internal system of a participating center within the 12 months prior to intervention start
* Availability of clinically relevant treatment notes (e.g. physician letters, progress notes, discharge summaries, consultation notes) suitable for anonymized analysis
Patients (Control Group - Module A):
•No requirement for access to an internet-enabled device
Healthcare Practitioners (Modules A \& D):
* Aged 18 years or older
* Employed at one of the study centers
* Ability to give informed consent
* For Module D: experience in relevant clinical field and familiarity with medical terminology and treatment standards
Relatives (Module B):
* Aged 18 years or older
* Ability to give informed consent
* Identified as family member, friend, or legal representative of a participating patient
Experts (Module E):
* Demonstrated expertise or professional experience in digital health Relevant experience with telematics infrastructure (TI), HL7 FHIR®, ePA, KIM, TIM, or affiliation with relevant institutions (e.g. gematik GmbH, HL7 Deutschland e.V., mio42 GmbH)
* Participation in or co-design of health IT interoperability projects
Patients and Physicians (Module E):
* Good proficiency in German (workshops conducted in German)
* Basic digital literacy and experience with digital technologies in healthcare
Exclusion Criteria
* Insufficient German language skills
* Severe organic brain disorders with cognitive impairment
* Intellectual disability
* Acute self-endangerment or danger to others at time of inclusion
* Lack of capacity to provide informed consent
* Lack of access to an internet-enabled device and inability to receive text messages (except in control group of Module A)
Module D:
* Clinical notes that cannot be anonymized due to legal, ethical, or technical restrictions
* Presence of rare diagnoses or unique treatment histories that hinder effective anonymization
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universität zu Köln
UNKNOWN
Technische Hochschule Brandenburg
UNKNOWN
Julian Schwarz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Julian Schwarz
Julian Schwarz, MD Specialist in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Research Associate Mental Health Policy & Digitization Research Group
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Florian Wurster, M.Sc. Health Services Research
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Cologne
Eva Meier-Diedrich, M.Sc. Psychology
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Medical School Brandenburg
Julian Schwarz, MD, Specialist in Psychiatry
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical School Brandenburg
Ute Karbach, Priv.-Doz. Dr. rer. pol.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cologne
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
Johnson MO, Rose CD, Dilworth SE, Neilands TB. Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of Health Care Empowerment: development and validation of the Health Care Empowerment inventory. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045692. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
Wurster, Florian, Eva Meier-Diedrich, I. Demirer, Catherine DesRoches, Nina Goldberg, Maria Hägglund, C. Herrmann, U. Karbach, A. Purohit, T. Schrader, J. Schwarz, 2024. "Online-Zugang Zu Klinischen Behandlungsnotizen Für Ambulant Versorgte Patienten (Studienprotokoll Zur OpenNOTES-Studie)." Nervenheilkunde, 43(12), 714-719.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
General information about the concept of open notes itself and the OpenNOTES-study
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
271012025-BO-E
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.