Dual-function Semirigid Thoracoscopy Versus Rigid Thoracoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pleural Disease
NCT ID: NCT07114783
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-30
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Limitations of rigid thoracoscopy include restricted maneuverability (especially in posterior/mediastinal areas), increased procedural pain from leveraging against ribs and larger trocars, higher sedation requirements, and a steep learning curve for pulmonologists.
To address these issues, a novel dual-function semirigid thoracoscope (UE FET-680, China) was developed. Its straight working channel accommodates standard rigid biopsy forceps, potentially matching rigid thoracoscopy's diagnostic yield while improving usability. This randomized trial will compare the efficacy and safety of this new device versus conventional rigid thoracoscopy in undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dual-function Semirigid Thoracoscopy Versus Semirigid Thoracoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pleural Diseases: A Multicenter Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06744725
A Trial of Rigid Versus Semirigid Thoracoscopy in the Evaluation of Exudative Pleural Effusions
NCT01726556
Mini Thoracoscopy vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Exudative Pleural Effusions
NCT02851927
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Guided Medical Thoracoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pleural Disease
NCT06741839
Minirigid Versus Conventional Rigid Thoracoscopy in Undiagnosed Pleural Effusions
NCT03449602
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dual-function Semi-rigid Thoracoscopy
Dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy
Patients received pleural biopsy via dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy.
Rigid Thoracoscopy
Rigid thoracoscopy
Patients received pleural biopsy via rigid thoracoscopy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy
Patients received pleural biopsy via dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy.
Rigid thoracoscopy
Patients received pleural biopsy via rigid thoracoscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with unilateral pleural effusion of unclear aetiology after less invasive means of diagnosis;
3. Fully informed of the purpose and method of the study, agreed to participate in the study, and signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with a tendency for uncontrolled bleeding, unstable cardiovascular status or severe heart failure;
3. Patients with complete pleural symphysis, where it was not possible to create a pneumothorax, were excluded subsequently;
4. Patients with refractory cough;
5. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 4;
6. Patients did not agree to participate in this study;
7. Participation in other studies within three months without withdrawal or termination will affect the observation of this study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gang Hou
Principal Investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-UE-2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.