Comparison of Magnesium Sulphate vs Tramadol as Adjuvants in Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain in TURP Patients
NCT ID: NCT07113782
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-01
2025-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Does the addition of magnesium sulfate or tramadol prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia compared to bupivacaine alone?
Does either adjuvant provide better intraoperative hemodynamic stability?
Researchers will compare two groups:
One group receiving magnesium sulfate plus bupivacaine
Another group receiving tramadol plus bupivacaine
to see which combination is more effective for pain control and hemodynamic outcomes.
Participants will:
Receive spinal anesthesia with either magnesium sulfate or tramadol added to bupivacaine.
Be monitored during surgery for heart rate, blood pressure, and other vital signs.
Be assessed after surgery for pain levels and time until first request for additional pain medication.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tramadol / Magnesium in Ropivacaine Solution in UG-bilateral TAP Block and Analgesia in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT07289321
Perioperative Electroacupuncture on Postoperative Analgesia in Prostatectomy
NCT01526525
Comparison of Post-Operative Analgesia After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
NCT04835116
Intravenous Tramadol and Magnesium Sulphate for Prevention of Shivering
NCT06612996
A Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of ULTRACETĀ® (Tramadol Hydrochloride/Acetaminophen) Versus ULTRAMĀ® (Tramadol Hydrochloride) Versus Placebo in Patients With Pain After Oral Surgery
NCT00236483
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary aim was to evaluate:
The duration of postoperative analgesia, defined as the time from the completion of surgery to the patient's first request for rescue analgesia.
Intraoperative hemodynamic stability, assessed by monitoring mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and the incidence of hypotension or bradycardia.
A total of 60 adult male patients, aged 50 to 80 years, undergoing elective TURP were randomly allocated into two groups (30 patients each):
Group M (Magnesium Group): Received 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 50 mg of magnesium sulfate intrathecally.
Group T (Tramadol Group): Received 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 20 mg of tramadol intrathecally.
All patients received spinal anesthesia at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace under aseptic conditions. Intraoperative monitoring included ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. Data on hemodynamic parameters were collected at regular intervals throughout the procedure.
Primary Outcome Measures:
Time to first postoperative analgesic request (in minutes)
Mean arterial pressure and heart rate during the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measures:
Time to two-segment regression of the sensory block
Incidence of adverse events including hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, and respiratory depression
Blinding was maintained for both patients and the investigator recording postoperative outcomes.
The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Armed Forces Institute of Urology (AFIU), Rawalpindi. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to inclusion in the study.
This trial was completed before registration and is being submitted retrospectively for transparency and publication compliance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental - Group M (Magnesium Sulphate)
Patients receive 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 50 mg (0.1 mL) magnesium sulphate intrathecally.
Intervention Name: Magnesium sulphate
1. Magnesium Sulphate 2. Tramadol
Magnesium Sulphate (Group M): 50 mg magnesium sulphate added to 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, administered intrathecally.
Tramadol (Group T): 25 mg tramadol added to 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, administered intrathecally.
Active Comparator - Group T (Tramadol)
Patients receive 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 mg (0.5 mL) tramadol intrathecally.
Intervention Name: Tramadol
1. Magnesium Sulphate 2. Tramadol
Magnesium Sulphate (Group M): 50 mg magnesium sulphate added to 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, administered intrathecally.
Tramadol (Group T): 25 mg tramadol added to 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, administered intrathecally.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1. Magnesium Sulphate 2. Tramadol
Magnesium Sulphate (Group M): 50 mg magnesium sulphate added to 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, administered intrathecally.
Tramadol (Group T): 25 mg tramadol added to 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, administered intrathecally.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for elective transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
* Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindications to spinal anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, infection at the injection site)
* History of chronic opioid use or substance abuse
* Severe hepatic, renal, or cardiac disease
* Neurological or psychiatric disorders affecting pain perception or reporting
* Participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days
50 Years
80 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jawad Ul Hassan
Anaesthesiologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AFIU
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Trg 1/RB/2024/008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.