Comparison of Double Lumen Tube Location Verification Techniques in Single Lung Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT07107893

Last Updated: 2025-08-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

93 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-16

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to compare auscultation, fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and video double lumen tube (VDLT) double lumen tube (DLT) location confirmation techniques in terms of intraoperative tube location confirmation time, number of tube dislocations, correction time of dislocations, FOB usage rates, lung deflation quality, postoperative sore throat, presence of hoarseness and cost in thoracic surgery patients undergoing one lung ventilation (OLV).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The single-center, prospective and observational study included 93 patients aged 18-84 years, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-III, who were to undergo one-lung ventilation in the lateral decubitus position by thoracic surgery under elective conditions. Patients were randomized into Group I: Group with confirmed tube location by auscultation, Group II: Group with confirmed tube location by FOB and Group III: The group in which double lumen tube with video was used. Demographic data of the patients, intubation times, tube site confirmation times, number of type dislocation, dislocation correction time, number and duration of FOB use, quality of lung deflation, presence of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness were recorded. The three groups were compared in terms of cost.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer Lung Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

grup I

Group with confirmed tube location by auscultation

No interventions assigned to this group

Grup II

Group with confirmed tube location by fiberoptic bronchoscope

No interventions assigned to this group

Grup III

The group in which double lumen tube with video was used

double lumen tube with video

Intervention Type DEVICE

Methods used to confirm tube placement in one-lung ventilation: auscultation, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and video to evaluate double-lumen tube use

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

double lumen tube with video

Methods used to confirm tube placement in one-lung ventilation: auscultation, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and video to evaluate double-lumen tube use

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

fiberoptic bronchoscope

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who will undergo TAV and be placed in the lateral position.
* Patients with ASA scores of I-III.
* Patients aged 18-84.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing emergency surgery
* Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) IV and above
* Patients with anticipated difficult intubation
* Patients requiring intubation with a right thoracic duct (CLT)
* Patients with more than three intubation attempts
* Patients who refuse to participate in the study
* Patients who will undergo TAV but will not be placed in the lateral position (sympathectomy)
* Patients with uncontrolled metabolic disease
* Mentally retarded patients
* Patients under 18 or over 84
* Patients with tracheal or airway abnormalities
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

84 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kayseri City Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Arzu Fırat Durbilmez

assistant doctor of anesthesiology and reanimation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kayseri Şehir Hastanesi

Kayseri, Kocasinan, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol: RESEARCH PROTOCOL

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: INFORMED VOLUNTARY CONSENT FORM

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-KEAK-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.