Establishing Clinical Utility Evidence for a Novel Alzheimer's Disease Blood-Based Biomarker Assay
NCT ID: NCT07099001
Last Updated: 2026-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
178 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-08
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Returning Research Results That Indicate Risk of Alzheimer Disease Dementia to Healthy Participants in Longitudinal Studies
NCT04699786
Clinical Trial Protocol: Alzheimer's Dementia Underlying Encephalopathy
NCT07222280
A Study of LY2886721 in Healthy Participants and Participants Diagnosed With Alzheimer's Disease
NCT01807026
Quality Improvement PrecivityAD Clinician Survey (QUIP I)
NCT05477056
A Study to Test the Performance of the CogState Computerized Neuropsychological Battery in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (0000-086)(COMPLETED)
NCT00777608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will evaluate the clinical utility of Alzheimer's disease assay by analyzing improvement in the quality of physician decision-making regarding patients with symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, using a validated patient-simulation-based measurement approach, to achieve the following:
1. Measure variation in clinical decisions among practicing neurologists, specifically in how they detect, measure, and manage Alzheimer's disease in patients with symptoms and/or risk factors of cognitive decline.
2. Determine whether education on the Alzheimer's disease assay with accompanying test results leads to changes in clinical decision-making with regard to follow-up testing (e.g., CSF analysis, PET imaging), diagnostic accuracy, and treatment recommendations.
3. Model whether the use of the Alzheimer's disease assay leads to higher-value and/or lower-cost care decisions (including follow-up testing, diagnostics, and treatment) that can lead to more efficient care.
4. Determine whether the Alzheimer's disease assay results differentially impact treatment decisions for different patient types (use cases).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The intervention arm participants will receive educational material about the novel Alzheimer's disease assay after round 1 of data collection. After a waiting period, intervention arm participants will receive the results of the AD assay at the appropriate point in the virtual patient simulation. Control arm participants will not receive results of the AD assay, but will have access to standard of care tools during both rounds of case administration.
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Control participants will complete two rounds of three virtual patient cases. In both rounds, control participants will have access to standard of care diagnostic tools. They will not receive the AD assay test results.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention
Intervention participants will complete two rounds of three virtual patient cases. In the first round, intervention participants will have access to standard of care diagnostic tools. They will then receive educational material about a novel AD assay. In the second round, they will automatically receive test results for the novel AD assay in addition to standard of care tools.
Educational materials on the Alzheimer's disease assay
Between Round 1 and Round 2 virtual patient case administration, Intervention participants will receive educational materials describing the clinical validation and use cases of the Alzheimer's disease assay. These materials will approximate the type of information physicians would receive to introduce them to the Alzheimer's disease assay and may be comprised of a slide deck, fact sheet, sample test report, and/or example case scenarios.
Alzheimer's disease assay results
Within each of their virtual patient cases in Round 2 of case administration, Intervention participants will receive Alzheimer's disease assay results at the clinically appropriate point for each case.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Educational materials on the Alzheimer's disease assay
Between Round 1 and Round 2 virtual patient case administration, Intervention participants will receive educational materials describing the clinical validation and use cases of the Alzheimer's disease assay. These materials will approximate the type of information physicians would receive to introduce them to the Alzheimer's disease assay and may be comprised of a slide deck, fact sheet, sample test report, and/or example case scenarios.
Alzheimer's disease assay results
Within each of their virtual patient cases in Round 2 of case administration, Intervention participants will receive Alzheimer's disease assay results at the clinically appropriate point for each case.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Average at least 20 hours per week of clinical and patient care duties over the past six months
* Routinely evaluate patients at risk for Alzheimer's disease
* Practicing in the United States
* Able to read English
* Access to the internet
* Not participating in a clinical research study of the AD assay
* Informed, signed, and voluntarily consented to participate in this study
Exclusion Criteria
* Board certification in neurology over 35 years ago
* Unable to read English
* Unable to access the internet
* Not practicing in the United States
* Not averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical or patient care duties over the past six months
* Participating in a clinical research study of the AD assay
* Do not voluntarily consent to participate in this study
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Qure Healthcare, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Trever Burgon, PhD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Trever Burgon, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
QURE Healthcare
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
QURE Healthcare
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00083791
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.